UConn in the NFL | Page 92 | The Boneyard
.-.

UConn in the NFL

huskymedic said:
Expand ...

www.si.com

Bills' rookie ranks among NFL's best for Preseason Week 1 effort vs. Giants

The Buffalo Bills' rookie offensive lineman was dominant in first preseason game of the season.
www.si.com www.si.com

-> In the Bills' preseason opener against the Giants, Lundt logged 32 pass protection snaps, not allowing a single pressure, tying him for second among rookie offensive linemen after the first week of NFL preseason games.

-> We know at the point of the game Lundt was getting those snaps, was late and against other rookies, and third or fourth string players, who most likely won't survive cutdown day. Still, it's good to see the rookie dominate when given the opportunity, which could lead to additionally snaps against higher quality players. Test the young lineman, and see just how good he could be. <-
 
.-.
Lundt playing LT first quarter and Van Denmark playing RT against the Bucs.

Not sure if they started since I turned on game with 5 min gone in first quarter but they've played every snap since I've turned on the game.
Lundt moving real well in pass protection setting bis base and squaring up the defenders.
 
Exit 4 said:
Interesting projection here on the Bills fan site about our OLs.

www.syracuse.com

Bills 53-man roster projection: Buffalo makes 2 trades and has one surprise at WR

Our latest projection on the Bills' roster after two preseason games.
www.syracuse.com www.syracuse.com
Expand ...
Similar discussion: Bills final 53-man roster projection: Decisions at wide receiver, injury complications at CB

-> The other decision point is whether to keep Lundt, Ryan Van Demark or both. Keeping both will be difficult, especially with some stress on the roster to keep more players elsewhere. If the Bills were to only keep five receivers, either by trading Samuel or cutting one of the six listed, that could pave the way for Van Demark to stick. However, if they only keep nine offensive linemen, Lundt has played well enough — including how he looked at left tackle in the preseason finale — to make the Bills want to keep the rookie sixth-round pick away from waivers. With a league thirsty for depth offensive linemen, Van Demark could fetch a Day 3 pick in a trade, which is what I have them doing for the final roster projection. For all his pre-cutdown day deals, Beane has flipped a depth offensive lineman more than any other position.

Projected Trade: Ryan Van Demark to Falcons for 2026 6th round pick <-
 
.-.
huskymedic said:
Similar discussion: Bills final 53-man roster projection: Decisions at wide receiver, injury complications at CB

-> The other decision point is whether to keep Lundt, Ryan Van Demark or both. Keeping both will be difficult, especially with some stress on the roster to keep more players elsewhere. If the Bills were to only keep five receivers, either by trading Samuel or cutting one of the six listed, that could pave the way for Van Demark to stick. However, if they only keep nine offensive linemen, Lundt has played well enough — including how he looked at left tackle in the preseason finale — to make the Bills want to keep the rookie sixth-round pick away from waivers. With a league thirsty for depth offensive linemen, Van Demark could fetch a Day 3 pick in a trade, which is what I have them doing for the final roster projection. For all his pre-cutdown day deals, Beane has flipped a depth offensive lineman more than any other position.

Projected Trade: Ryan Van Demark to Falcons for 2026 6th round pick <-
Expand ...


Lundt played the whole game at LT and looked good against the Bucs. More than held his own against them. It's pre-season and I wasn't paying much attention but somewhere in the second half the Bills put in a different RT but Van Denmark looked plenty good while he was in the game.

Regardless of what happens both of them have had a fair chance and have plenty of game film snaps from the preseason. And I have zero doubt if the Bills put Van Denmark on the market, he gets snatched up quickly.
 
Husky25 said:
Any player who makes it this far has a good chance to end up on a practice squad.
Expand ...
Unfortunately, no. It's not like the old days when they would cut some each week to gradually get down to target at the end of camp. Then, if you made it to the end of camp, you were pretty close to making the team. Now they go from the camp max of 90 to 53 in cutdown week. That was just the first cut. They still have to cut another 25+. The practice squads have grown to 16 so he does have a shot. Teams don't necessarily cut in order of interest in keeping a player, but early cuts generally have a lower probability of being resigned.
 
texanswire.usatoday.com

Keep or Cut: Which Texans bubble players make the active 53-man roster?

The Houston Texans have 33 players fighting to make the roster. Here's who are the favorites to land on the active roster.
texanswire.usatoday.com texanswire.usatoday.com

-> DL Foley Fatukasi - Even though Fatukasi was limited this preseason, he's arguably the Texans' best run defender in the interior. That'll earn you a roster spot as a rotational option.

Verdict: Keep <-
 
.-.
kibblesnbits said:
Unfortunately, no. It's not like the old days when they would cut some each week to gradually get down to target at the end of camp. Then, if you made it to the end of camp, you were pretty close to making the team. Now they go from the camp max of 90 to 53 in cutdown week. That was just the first cut. They still have to cut another 25+. The practice squads have grown to 16 so he does have a shot. Teams don't necessarily cut in order of interest in keeping a player, but early cuts generally have a lower probability of being resigned.
Expand ...
Honestly, I thought this was still the case. Evidently, as you say, they get cut from wherever they are to 53 all in one day...More or less.

There's both some positives and negatives to that. For one, it doesn't give the initial cuts any time to hook up with another team. On the other hand it gives them more game time to prove themselves. It also floods the waiver wire so if a team is trying to sneak a talent through to the PS, chances are other teams are as well and they are focused on their own.
 
huskymedic said:


Expand ...

Glad to hear about Nate Carter. But the other part of me is that instead of staying at UConn he transfers to a bigger and better program for what?

He was undrafted…

Nice…

Had he stayed at UConn and made a legacy and maybe more national exposure in that he would have been a small fish / little pond instead of option 2/3 .

I think Sky Bell figured it out.

If your goal is NFL, there is absolutely no reason you can’t do everything you want to do here at UConn.
 
.-.
UCan3 said:
Glad to hear about Nate Carter. But the other part of me is that instead of staying at UConn he transfers to a bigger and better program for what?

He was undrafted…

Nice…

Had he stayed at UConn and made a legacy and maybe more national exposure in that he would have been a small fish / little pond instead of option 2/3 .

I think Sky Bell figured it out.

If your goal is NFL, there is absolutely no reason you can’t do everything you want to do here at UConn.
Expand ...
Sure, if all things were equal, but I don't think they were.

Carter's NIL Income is undisclosed, but that doesn't mean it was nothing. I love UConn, but doubt very much that UConn drew more eyeballs than MSU football, simply by virtue of who they play, week in & week out.

Carter wasn't just a JAG either. He was MSU's feature back in 2023 with >900 all-purpose yards against Big Ten competition. No other player was close. He was a captain in 2024 and led the Spartans with 5 Rushing TDs.

At the end of the day, he bet on himself and won. Multiple times over.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Online statistics

Members online
414
Guests online
5,704
Total visitors
6,118
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,327
Messages
4,476,124
Members
10,350
Latest member
Donec


Top Bottom