- Joined
- Jun 8, 2014
- Messages
- 10,072
- Reaction Score
- 35,686
I think you try too hard to prove a point that doesn’t really need to be proven. None of those guys are masterful around the rim and DC can already dunk fine just like them. Gobert has never developed any type of offensive game and he gives virtually nothing there. DC spreading the court puts his floor above Gobert, Claxton, guys like that.Brook Lopez became the Nets all-time leading scorer by having a high level post game. Then yeah, after already having that mastered he developed a 3 point shot. It added to his game. He didn’t skip steps.
You’re saying a 3 point shot is needed for him to be a net positive player and playable (I think?)
I’m saying him standing by the rim and dunking like a Gobert, Jarrett Allen, Nic Claxton, Walker Kessler says that it is not. He already passes at a level better than all of those guys. A 3 point shot isn’t making or breaking him being a positive contributor. And it’s not the first thing that is needed to become a star player. It’s probably the last thing.
You’re acting like he’s abandoning the post. It’s very hyperbolic. He’s already not much of an offensive outlet, having him threat from the perimeter helps his numbers along with the team with spacing. In case you haven’t noticed, 3s are the king of the game right now. He has strengths and weaknesses. The Blazers obviously know he is no post savant, and they seem to think having him as a threat from the perimeter best helps their team to win. It’s fine if you don’t like it, it’s just not the way things go.
Last edited: