We ideally would like 5 guards. I don't consider Jackson a True guard option at this time.surprising. assuming we get alleyne we dont have PT for this guy and castle
i still dont see where the PT is coming from even if we start a small ball lineup. this guy demands another 20 mpg at least.We ideally would like 5 guards. I don't consider Jackson a True guard option at this time.
We have 5 open spots. We better add more than 2 guys.Femi would add a physicality we don't have with anyone else we're connected to, a bit of a Corey Floyd replacement. But, eh...He doesn't really do much except draw fouls and then not really make the free throws. He gets to the rim, but not a great finisher or playmaker once there.
We need at least one more guard after Newton/Hawkins/Alleyne. Probably 2, but may be only get 1 from the following and this is my preference:
Castle -> Ramey -> Rudi Williams -> Femi
You get what you get and you don’t get upset.this is my preference:
Castle -> Ramey -> Rudi Williams -> Femi
FIFY. Well it's my sentiment if not yours.Femi would add a physicality we don't have with anyone else we're connected to, a bit of a Corey Floyd replacement. But, eh...He doesn't really do much except draw fouls and then not really make the free throws. He gets to the rim, but not a great finisher or playmaker once there.
We need at least one more guard after Newton/Hawkins/Alleyne. Probably 2, but may be only get 1 from the following and this is my preference:
Castle -> Ramey -> Rudi Williams -> Femi
(Would love to get Newton, Castle, Williams, and Alleyne. I'd consider that a walkoff homerun).
the only way that possibly works is if we capped PT at 25 mpg and primarily play a small ball lineup. nothing wrong with either i guess.We need at least one more guard after Newton/Hawkins/Alleyne. Probably 2, but may be only get 1 from the following and this is my preference:
Castle -> Ramey -> Rudi Williams -> Femi
(Would love to get Newton, Castle, Williams, and Alleyne. I'd consder that a homerun).
Yes, but we're going to add some guys who aren't realistically going to be in the rotation. With Newton and Hawkins, we can take two more guards who expect to be in the rotation. Then you have AJ as an emergency, and one more guard who won't be expected to play any more than Diggins. But the guy who will play that role is not at the level of the guys we're talking about. If we get Alleyne, that means either Castle or one more guard who could be expected to compete for starters minutes.We have 5 open spots. We better add more than 2 guys.
That's the Femi Paradox.One of those schools doesn't belong on that list.
the only way that possibly works is if we capped PT at 25 mpg and primarily play a small ball lineup. nothing wrong with either i guess.
but even then, 1 of the 5 Gs is capped at 20 mpg... i'm gonna say it's rudi williams. we would also have to restrict samson, karaban, and clingan's minutes a lot which is very risky.
Newton 25- Williams 15
Castle 25- Alleyne 10- Williams 5
Hawkins 25- Alleyne 15
Jackson 25- Samson 5- Karaban 10
Sanogo 25- Samson 10- Clingan 5
25- Newton, Castle, Alleyne, Hawkins, Jackson, Sanogo
20- Williams
15- Samson
10- Karaban
5- Clingan
#5 though.
He loves Connecticut lobster rolls and New Haven pizza.Why would Alleyne come to Uconn and play 5, 10 or 15 less minutes a game than he did at VT
He didn’t play 40mpg at tech he was at 30 which is 5 more than I projected and as much as anyone else on the team could get with that kinda depth. Not a bad trade off if you are competing for a chip…Why would Alleyne come to Uconn and play 5, 10 or 15 less minutes a game than he did at VT
Yep. I keep saying the focus after the next guy to commit is on developmental guys. We’d arguably have more minutes at forward than guard with Alleyne coming + Castle. Maybe Castle doesn‘t reclass, which changes some math. Maybe this just keeps the pressure on.He didn’t play 40mpg at tech he was at 30 which is 5 more than I projected and as much as anyone else on the team could get with that kinda depth. Not a bad trade off if you are competing for a chip…
But idk if you comprehended the post. I was highlighting how hard it would be to allocate minutes if we brought in 4 good Gs.
Just wondering who VT brought in that was going to take minutes away from Alleyne.He didn’t play 40mpg at tech he was at 30 which is 5 more than I projected and as much as anyone else on the team could get with that kinda depth. Not a bad trade off if you are competing for a chip…
But idk if you comprehended the post. I was highlighting how hard it would be to allocate minutes if we brought in 4 good Gs.
Maddox was taking his minutes who shooting 50% from 3 granted on limited attempts as a froshJust wondering who VT brought in that was going to take minutes away from Alleyne.
Just wondering who VT brought in that was going to take minutes away from Alleyne.
Did Mike Young leave VT? Seems like VT like to play 3 or 4 guards most of the time.Just wondering who VT brought in that was going to take minutes away from Alleyne.
One of those schools doesn't belong on that list.