My only complaint (as to context) is that the initial public accusations (which Allred took and ran with) made it appear that rapes were pervasive throughout UConn's campus and SH was the ringleader in covering things up. The tone of the releases on football player(s) being involved are piling on to the initial release, painting a very ugly picture (which, if eventually proven untrue, will receive zero press to retract the allegations).
Call me old fashioned but I am a firm believer that our women and children should always be protected. If something did happen and the campus police (a female among those behaving this way no less) did attempt to minimize what happened and point blame at the victim, they should be subject to criminal prosecution. I will be stunned if it comes out that the police behaved this way under direction of the school's administration, which is what the press is attempting to imply.
Question: To whom or what do the Campus Police report?
Question: To whom or what do the Campus Police report?
There is a self interest to not portray campus as anything but safe. Reported rape and other assaults end up in statistical reports on the university. It happens, it's wrong, and that is where the pressure and change efforts should be applied. To try to expand the issue for publicity, financial gain, or gender-based agendas only distracts from the tangible issue.
The remedy is disciplinary action, and training. If a directed policy can be proved, only then does the civil rights aspect come into play.
IMV, this effort has started off on the wrong side of credibility.
If I said anything like what the police officer said, I would expect to lose my job.
And that's the things. Those are ALLEGED comments by the cop. Like a lot of other things in this case it's he said-she said or she said-she said. If true, the cop should lose their job. If false, should rightfully blow a pretty good hole in the litigants' case.
The university has already shown it is singularly disinterested in investigating the cop.
Anyone with daughters should take no quarter in this fight because the attitude toward s e xual assault is atrocious on college campuses (never mind the rest of society). Especially college campuses though where you have a hothouse atmosphere full of bros.
I hope I have misunderstood your comment but that seems to be pretty racist.
1. bro
Obnoxious partying males who are often seen at college parties. When they aren’t making an ass of themselves they usually just stand around holding a red plastic cup waiting for something exciting to happen so they can scream something that demonstrates how much they enjoy partying. Nearly everyone in a fraternity is a bro but there are also many bros who are not in a fraternity. They often wear a rugby shirt and a baseball cap. It is not uncommon for them to have spiked hair with frosted tips.
Bros actually chose this name for themselves as they often refer to each other as "bro" even though they are not related.
I couldn't go to sleep last night because some bros at the party next door kept screaming, "Whoooooo!!! YEAAHHHHH! Whooooooo!"
Bro.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bro
I obviously misunderstood your comment. My apologies.
The university has already shown it is singularly disinterested in investigating the cop.
I haven't read every detail of the case but this cop hasn't been spoken to by superiors or others at UConn?
Has anyone read the actual complaint? It appears at least 2 of the plaintiffs have very legitimate claims supported by objective evidence, 1 is in a gray area, and one of the plaintiffs is attempting to hold UConn responsible for activities by foreign nationals that occurred in a foreign country.
My question after reading this is: why is UConn financially responsible for this? There are criminal and direct civil avenues for redress against the assailants. There may even by a civil rights case that can be made against the assailants. Why is UConn responsible?
What do you mean by spoken to? Like, "Don't do that?" The proper response would be to fire the person.
The proper response would be to fire the person IF it can be verified that is what they said after an investigation. You know, that quaint notion of due process and all. Still want to know how UConn addressed this with the cop
I respect your overall stance upstater. s e xual assault and domestic violence should be severely punished when claims are proven are true. I get that it's not easy for victims to come forward (although why Ricci did not seek medical treatment after this ALLEGED act is baffling). If UConn enabled the bad guys here, shame on them. Herbst has put her presidency on the line by saying these allegations were properly addressed. If that's proven false, then she should pay the price.
But we've seen too many cases like this -- not just Duke lacrosse -- where the allegations were unfounded. Using Gloria Allred as a champion, IMO, hurts rather than helps their case. Then just throwing out "a football player raped me" without any more specifics or evidence indicts a whole lot of innocent people who have no connection to this case. What if I said "the Women's Center is misusing state funds?" -- not equating rape with fraud, BTW -- but charging a large group of people when at best only 1 or 2 may or may not have committed the act.
It's not baffling at all. People who are the victims of physical and/or psychological trauma don't always act logically.I get that it's not easy for victims to come forward (although why Ricci did not seek medical treatment after this ALLEGED act is baffling).
I provided plenty of links previously showing the schools are at fault. Whether Ricci's case is real or not is totally irrelevant for me given how often this happens, even at UConn.