Yes. But nationally the entire league currently has a fiscal problem that will diminish its stature and ability to recruit coaches, and players. And being outside the P3-4 means they make the rules. And they aren't making them for your benefit. But believe whatever your heart tells you. We are currently the exception to the rule, for now. But the tide keeps rising under those other conferences while we stay the same.The football money will be spent on football. This does not help basketball. You can’t convince me that we can’t keep winning in the Big East.
The football money will be spent on football. This does not help basketball. You can’t convince me that we can’t keep winning in the Big East.
See post above about once you are on a plane…Perhaps a review US geography might be in order for you.
Big XII opponents 1,000-1,500 away: 6
Big XII opponents 1,500-2,000 away: 4
Big XII opponents 2,000+ miles away: 4
This is not hopping around the Big East to NYC, Phila, Providence and DC with a once a season trip to Creighton (1,200 miles from BDL). This is every single road game with the exception of Cinn and WV.
Sure the football money will be spent on football and the basketball money will be spent on basketball. Right now we have very little football money so it would be a huge win.The football money will be spent on football. This does not help basketball. You can’t convince me that we can’t keep winning in the Big East.
Does Dan have a choice other than toeing the university line at this point? I think he’s a Big East guy, and I’m just glad this happened after he turned down the Lakers.
If you told me 20 years ago this same thing, I would agree.Just looking at the roster of schools in the Big 12 basketball I see a lot of AAC. It will ruin bball even with Kansas, Baylor and AZ
Best BB conference 3rd or 4th in football is not a bad place at all to be in. For UConn it would seem the ideal place.If you told me 20 years ago this same thing, I would agree.
It's a lot of "States" and not exactly the most prestigious collection of schools but it seems pretty safe to say at this point these are sports schools. This is clearly the best basketball conference in the country the last several years and they're pretty decent at football.
That‘s really not the issueDoes it really matter if we are winning national titles and able to schedule those teams now?
I see Villanova, PC and Marquette on the schedule going forward.Creighton and Marquette are the best programs other than us and honestly they don’t compare with Houston, Baylor and Kansas. Then there is the rest of the Big East. I would only miss playing our little brother Providence. In the Big 12 there also is Cincinnati, Arizona, West Virginia, Texas Tech, TCU, Iowa St, BYU, Utah. All teams who would finish in the upper half of the Big East. I see 2 schools that were in the AAC. UCF and Houston.
I think the Big East powers would frown upon any of their members playing usI see Villanova, PC and Marquette on the schedule going forward.
Why? Val was on record last week saying that conference bylaws plainly state how a school leaves the conference. In retrospect, this probably had to do with what is going now. The Big East always knew this could happen hence the big exit fee that went down over time. UConn had brought in big money via tournament credits. Both sides know this has been a mutually beneficial relationship, its just we have different needs going forward.I think the Big East powers would frown upon any of their members playing us
Pitt cuse bcu left. WVU Cinci Louisville VA Tech Miami Rutgers USF Temple all came and went. That's the way it must be.With the way things have progressed, UConn has two options. Drop football and bank on very short term basketball greatness while running the risk of basketball dying on the vine or have a seat at the table and remain a basketball superpower while making Saturdays matter in Connecticut sports.
Big East basketball has been an obsession of mine my whole life and I'll always love the Big East but the game has changed too much and it's about sustainability and survival at this point.
They can frown all they like but they're still going to play us because it makes financial and reputational sense to do so.I think the Big East powers would frown upon any of their members playing us
Just looking at the roster of schools in the Big 12 basketball I see a lot of AAC. It will ruin bball even with Kansas, Baylor and AZ
And if their feelings get too much in the way, then we'll have PLENTY of scheduling options.They can frown all they like but they're still going to play us because it makes financial and reputational sense to do so.
They can frown all they like but they're still going to play us because it makes financial and reputational sense to do so.
It's a 1000 miles to Marquette, it's over 900 miles to Depaul, 1200 miles to Creighton, Butler is 865 miles away. You get on a plane and fly to where you are going to be playing. Your not walking there or taking a bus trip.
And we will have given them 6-7 years of BB credits and two (hopefully three) championships.I have a feeling that if it happens it will be as amicable as possible. UConn has been pretty transparent.
If you care about football, yes. For basketball, we lose the regional rivalries and a stable, basketball-first conference in order to help football.Sure the football money will be spent on football and the basketball money will be spent on basketball. Right now we have very little football money so it would be a huge win.
Those schools are not exactly making the argument that leaving the Big East is the path to long term basketball success.Pitt cuse bcu left. WVU Cinci Louisville VA Tech Miami Rutgers USF Temple all came and went. That's the way it must be.