- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 30,094
- Reaction Score
- 50,080
No, it isn't. As someone right above you pointed out, Cinci and SMU. Conference may be a small factor but it isn't some massive albatross and it never will be, no matter how many times people say it is.
In the same way, the Big East isn't some major draw to top recruits. We have the P5, not some fictious P6 or P5+. People made that up to explain why we suck and Nova doesn't. Besides Nova, how do people explain Gonzaga? Do we have a P7 now?
The real reason why Cinci, SMU, Nova and Gonzaga win as much as they do is coaching. A great coach can win from within any conference. You can win more consistently and have a better shot of winning it all if you are in a P5 conference but you can still win from within a non-P5 conference and you can still get to the final four and you can still even win a championship. The Big East was not P5 before Nova won it all and still isn't, period. Coaching matters.
There's a huge disconnect on the Boneyard. People are referring to the drop in recruiting as an AAC fault. But then others mention SMU and Cincy (which haven't done much in the postseason) without noticing that SMU and Cincy don't recruit well.