- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 9,379
- Reaction Score
- 23,676
Hopefully I'm not preempting any more casualties by writing a reflective post when the storm is rumored to be ongoing, but for my own sanity I needed to write something.
I think we're starting to get a look at a different side of Ollie. It's not a bad side, necessarily. In fact, I think it's a good one. I posted earlier in the season - in what was half hot take, half genuine concern - that I worried he was too nice of a guy at times to be a great college coach. I no longer have that concern. He's a competitive mother f ___er and he wouldn't have lasted as long as he did in the NBA otherwise.
With that in mind, I don't think he's pushing anybody out the door, but perhaps he's less inclined to blow smoke up players asses after what has to have been the most frustrating season of his life. This is a guy who has very distinct vision on how he wants to play, and Jackson and Enoch - the former of whom is a bit plodding and the other of whom is a statue - cap the ceiling of what we can be defensively. Jackson got torched defensively late in the season and I suspect Ollie was blunt about how his minutes would vacillate as a result. Larrier struggled defensively in the three games he played last season, but he meets the prototype of an Ollie player from a physical perspective - he's long, rangy, and bulkier than he was coming in. If Daniels can evolve from a defensive liability to an anchor of a championship defense, there is reason to think Larrier can do the same. And now, he has to.
No sugarcoating things of course. Losing Jackson is a blow, for sentimental reasons if nothing else. He was a very useful offensive player - somebody who could have been what Daniels was offensively if not necessarily defensively - that was composed beyond his years. The kid simply knew how to play, and because of his physical limitations, I figured he'd be the rare player who stuck around and contributed for all four years. As a fan, losing guys like that hurts a lot. Even if he's not the type of guy you win a championship with, there's a lot more to being a fan with that...with this player, I expected a lot of wins and a lot of memories. Now, all of that is gone, and if that's self-serving, so be it. Vance can tweet what he wants about fake love, but ultimately, we're part of the UConn family and not the Jackson family. His father clearly wants what's best for him but might not know what's best. My hunch is he's a bit toxic and I'd speculate - without knowing for sure - that he overstepped his boundaries on this one. When you're a father and you're breaking down tape on the season, there is a problem.
So long as Adams, Gilbert, Larrier, Vital, and Durham are in uniform next year, I'll take our chances. The last guy is essential. He's the perfect player for Ollie's system, somebody who can - when healthy - extend beyond the arch on hedges and still protect the rim. My sense is that Ollie's defensive philosophies mirror that of the Miami Heat circa 2012 - hyper-active trapping on ball screens, exerting a ton of energy on every possession, and protecting the rim in a way that most small teams cannot. Barring an unforeseen add in the grad market, Durham is going to have to be that guy. If he leaves, it's time to press the panic button.
I've made no secret of the fact that I thought Ollie did a bad job this year, and I'm uncomfortable with the Miller firing (though I support it as a necessary evil to improve recruiting). But big picture, I'm still not terribly far away from where I was after we won the title. This is still the same guy, with the same vision, and now, finally, similar players. Brimah never fit the system, Facey didn't until it was too late (and even then, he was frequently as much a liability as an asset) and Purvis was just a weird player who did everything you want on paper but could never figure it out.
Now, with Adams, you have your Shabazz. I said a few weeks ago that there is no player in the country I'd rather have next season, assuming the expected players depart, and I'm not backing off that statement. He's special, and I have to imagine he's keeping a list of the dudes who decided they'd rather play with someone else. This is too classic a UConn player to up.
Gilbert's size worries me defensively, and I anticipate that - much like Boat - he'll struggle on that end his first year or two. But he has tremendous upside along Adams and Vital, the latter of whom is the perfect 3 and D guy for what Ollie wants to run. I forget who said in the other thread that they'd cry if Vital leaves, but I'm with you. Honestly, I'd take him over Gilbert.
I hate to see Enoch go, but he wasn't really a guy that was going to solve any of our problems. He basically would have been what Enoch Wolf was to the 2013 team, which is a guy who can play but isn't really a long-term solution. Neither of these transfers rise to the level of losing Roscoe in 2012, and I think if a couple things break our way - Larrier and Durham both being healthy are the big ones - this team could really surprise some people next year, and I mean nationally. I'm still OK, for now. But the bleeding has really gotta stop here.
I think we're starting to get a look at a different side of Ollie. It's not a bad side, necessarily. In fact, I think it's a good one. I posted earlier in the season - in what was half hot take, half genuine concern - that I worried he was too nice of a guy at times to be a great college coach. I no longer have that concern. He's a competitive mother f ___er and he wouldn't have lasted as long as he did in the NBA otherwise.
With that in mind, I don't think he's pushing anybody out the door, but perhaps he's less inclined to blow smoke up players asses after what has to have been the most frustrating season of his life. This is a guy who has very distinct vision on how he wants to play, and Jackson and Enoch - the former of whom is a bit plodding and the other of whom is a statue - cap the ceiling of what we can be defensively. Jackson got torched defensively late in the season and I suspect Ollie was blunt about how his minutes would vacillate as a result. Larrier struggled defensively in the three games he played last season, but he meets the prototype of an Ollie player from a physical perspective - he's long, rangy, and bulkier than he was coming in. If Daniels can evolve from a defensive liability to an anchor of a championship defense, there is reason to think Larrier can do the same. And now, he has to.
No sugarcoating things of course. Losing Jackson is a blow, for sentimental reasons if nothing else. He was a very useful offensive player - somebody who could have been what Daniels was offensively if not necessarily defensively - that was composed beyond his years. The kid simply knew how to play, and because of his physical limitations, I figured he'd be the rare player who stuck around and contributed for all four years. As a fan, losing guys like that hurts a lot. Even if he's not the type of guy you win a championship with, there's a lot more to being a fan with that...with this player, I expected a lot of wins and a lot of memories. Now, all of that is gone, and if that's self-serving, so be it. Vance can tweet what he wants about fake love, but ultimately, we're part of the UConn family and not the Jackson family. His father clearly wants what's best for him but might not know what's best. My hunch is he's a bit toxic and I'd speculate - without knowing for sure - that he overstepped his boundaries on this one. When you're a father and you're breaking down tape on the season, there is a problem.
So long as Adams, Gilbert, Larrier, Vital, and Durham are in uniform next year, I'll take our chances. The last guy is essential. He's the perfect player for Ollie's system, somebody who can - when healthy - extend beyond the arch on hedges and still protect the rim. My sense is that Ollie's defensive philosophies mirror that of the Miami Heat circa 2012 - hyper-active trapping on ball screens, exerting a ton of energy on every possession, and protecting the rim in a way that most small teams cannot. Barring an unforeseen add in the grad market, Durham is going to have to be that guy. If he leaves, it's time to press the panic button.
I've made no secret of the fact that I thought Ollie did a bad job this year, and I'm uncomfortable with the Miller firing (though I support it as a necessary evil to improve recruiting). But big picture, I'm still not terribly far away from where I was after we won the title. This is still the same guy, with the same vision, and now, finally, similar players. Brimah never fit the system, Facey didn't until it was too late (and even then, he was frequently as much a liability as an asset) and Purvis was just a weird player who did everything you want on paper but could never figure it out.
Now, with Adams, you have your Shabazz. I said a few weeks ago that there is no player in the country I'd rather have next season, assuming the expected players depart, and I'm not backing off that statement. He's special, and I have to imagine he's keeping a list of the dudes who decided they'd rather play with someone else. This is too classic a UConn player to up.
Gilbert's size worries me defensively, and I anticipate that - much like Boat - he'll struggle on that end his first year or two. But he has tremendous upside along Adams and Vital, the latter of whom is the perfect 3 and D guy for what Ollie wants to run. I forget who said in the other thread that they'd cry if Vital leaves, but I'm with you. Honestly, I'd take him over Gilbert.
I hate to see Enoch go, but he wasn't really a guy that was going to solve any of our problems. He basically would have been what Enoch Wolf was to the 2013 team, which is a guy who can play but isn't really a long-term solution. Neither of these transfers rise to the level of losing Roscoe in 2012, and I think if a couple things break our way - Larrier and Durham both being healthy are the big ones - this team could really surprise some people next year, and I mean nationally. I'm still OK, for now. But the bleeding has really gotta stop here.