I like to laugh at St. John’s and Pitino as much as anyone, but is not getting some random MAAC player that big a deal?
This is what I said in this thread. And for the record, I was mocking the fact that Pitino thought he was going to compete in the Big East with MAAC players long before this thread.
1) What does UConn need to do to catch Providence? Maybe the Providence posters on this board can provide some ideas. 2) What is a realistic annual win total for Syracuse going forward? 10? 3) Is it possible for Calipari to continue to suck on the same stratospheric level of terribleness he...
the-boneyard.com
Can I help bring you back to reality for a second? The actual real discussion (not the one you're having in your head) was that he's a good player and sought after recruit that many thought was a lock to commit to his former coach at St. John's (who currently has almost no one on the roster for next season) and thus was a bad loss for Pitino.
You've taken this down some bonkers rabbit holes and strawmen but I have no idea how the actual point being made is even arguable.
Either he is a good player or he isn't. Rather than argue the merits of whether some decent MAAC player is really going to move the needle in a major conference, posters like yourself just attack. You have multiple posts on this topic simply attacking me rather than arguing that this guy is actually any good.
For those scoring at home, the MAAC was the #23 conference in KenPom and the NET, out of 32. Comparing him to Newton is a stretch. Newton was successful in the AAC, and as much as the AAC is a joke, it is always a Top 10 league.
If you guys really think Claxton is going to move the needle in the SEC, then Butler is poised for Big East domination with their St. Francis and Central Arkansas transfers.