August_West
Conscience do cost
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 51,436
- Reaction Score
- 90,551
LOLHe has a fiduciary interest.
LOLHe has a fiduciary interest.
He did . Goodman chimed in too. I dont mention that asshat though, even when hes on my side (and he was here!) . Thats deliberate on my part.I think they were two separate segments that Dauster edited together. To add to the confusion, they were edited together back to back with no transition, so it sounded seamless on the pod.
No Its not. Like TO said "Every AD runs at a deficit its just how you position it"They do mention the money factor but quickly dismiss it as seemingly unimportant compared to being in the Big East for basketball. Yes, of course its about money. Money is the lifeblood of keeping athletics up and running and competitive.
The AAC was a horrible league. Hurley is the man and will be wildly successful in the Big East or the Big 12. Will you stipulate that the Big 12 isn’t in the same universe as the AAC?This is what is beautiful, you guys are both sides of mouth. We ALL thought UConn would dominate AAC when we joined, no?
And then first year in we won a Natty. But then the coach checked out (and he did for sure) and then you all say THAT is why we werent successful in the AAC. I will stipulate it was a component. Will you stipulate that the league was terrible for us? Our current NC winning coach actually says that. Is Hurley wrong?
I mean if you are talking what is the better KenPom league sure. Stipulated, counselor. It's not only about that, is it?The AAC was a horrible league. Hurley is the man and will be wildly successful in the Big East or the Big 12. Will you stipulate that the Big 12 isn’t in the same universe as the AAC?
Nope, it’s about whether UConn can be an amazing championship winning program - and they can because Hurley is great and the Big 12 wouldn’t drag the program down in power ratings or lack of top talent like the AAC did counselorI mean if you are talking what is the better KenPom league sure. Stipulated, counselor. It's not only about that, is it?
Perhaps I missed it, but I don't think they made the claim that we owe the Big East. They did say that the BE saved UConn instead of vice versa, but their reasons for not liking the move to the Big 12 were not about that.Any thought that UConn "owes" the Big East is LOL funny. We've done more for the Conference since we rejoined than PC has done in it's history.
Agree to disagree I guess. I understand some of that to an extent but it seems very risky to me to assume that continuing to run the largest AD deficit will not ultimately endanger the competitiveness of our AD. Lest we forget, pursuit of more money is what started this whole thing in the first place and continues to drive it, so I'm going to say there must be a lot of stupid people like me who think money is important in all this.No Its not. Like TO said "Every AD runs at a deficit its just how you position it"
And Ive said here before why does anyone here care about money? Its so stupid. As long as there is High D1 NCAA tourney UConn will be included.
perfectly written. It was more coaching than it was the conference. Sure, the AAC limits the ceiling for UConn if they are playing well and lowers the floor when they are playing bad, especially in home attendance. However, with Dan Hurley and his staff, UConn was on their way to becoming a NCAAT regular. When UConn was bad in the AAC it was like adding roller skates to the program while they were going downhill, it just made the descent that much sharper and faster.Rant incoming..not directed at Dauster or anybody specific but just my 2 cents on a topic I've heard way too often recently
Regarding who saved who between UConn and the BE, I don't think anybody saved anybody else. It was a mutually beneficial business decision. There's a lot of history and emotion behind that decision, but at the end of the day it was just good business.
The AAC was consistently sending 2-4 teams to the tournament while we were there. Sure they were mostly getting bounced in the 2nd round, but it's not like the AAC was a low major only getting 1 autobid. Teams were winning games and making the tournament, and with 2 exceptions we weren't one of them. Being in the AAC didn't help, and it did limit our potential imo, but it's not like we were cruising through the conference.. We were struggling, badly. Regardless of anybody's thoughts on the man, a lot of that is attributed to Kevin Ollie.
In comes Dan Hurley. After a couple of seasons of building, a few 4 star recruits for the future (including a future NBA lottery pick), and UConn is on track to win 20 games for the first time since 2016, with 3 star and 229th ranked recruit Christian Vital leading the charge. I don't think Dan Hurley goes on the recruiting spree he's on now if we stay in the AAC, but I do think UConn returns to the tournament and returns to being a winning program.
Fast forward to the Big East where there is immediate success, building on our AAC momentum. Last year the conference generally had a really bad OOC stretch, the BE anchor Villanova was struggling, and UConn kept it afloat. Let's face it, a few BE teams really bolstered their tournament resume last season by beating us down. I don't have the numbers in front of me but I'd bet that BE average attendance has also been on an upwards trend. The games just all mean a little bit more now, they're a little bit more nationally relevant, and UConn has a part to play in that. Certainly not all of it is because of UConn, because there's some really great coaches and players in the BE, but UConn played an important part.
If it was as easy as just being in the Big East, somebody other than Nova would have won one by now. So thank you Val for inviting us back, and you're welcome Val for bringing home another trophy.
/endrant
It was hurting Geno. At the time of the COVID shutdown he had his worst team since Kerry Bascom. That wasn't coaching.It was more coaching than it was the conference.
I agree with what you say… Uconn started to turn it around while in the aac when Hurley took over the program..and the big east is lucky to have Uconn..we are the biggest brand in the big east and last year we helped alot of schools because of how good we were.. also we will bring alot more money for the big east in the next media contract.. i also think the big east helps us keep Hurley and helps us with recruiting 4 and 5 star recruits… i think we lose Hurley and start recruiting 3 star recruits if we join the big 12Rant incoming..not directed at Dauster or anybody specific but just my 2 cents on a topic I've heard way too often recently
Regarding who saved who between UConn and the BE, I don't think anybody saved anybody else. It was a mutually beneficial business decision. There's a lot of history and emotion behind that decision, but at the end of the day it was just good business.
The AAC was consistently sending 2-4 teams to the tournament while we were there. Sure they were mostly getting bounced in the 2nd round, but it's not like the AAC was a low major only getting 1 autobid. Teams were winning games and making the tournament, and with 2 exceptions we weren't one of them. Being in the AAC didn't help, and it did limit our potential imo, but it's not like we were cruising through the conference.. We were struggling, badly. Regardless of anybody's thoughts on the man, a lot of that is attributed to Kevin Ollie.
In comes Dan Hurley. After a couple of seasons of building, a few 4 star recruits for the future (including a future NBA lottery pick), and UConn is on track to win 20 games for the first time since 2016, with 3 star and 229th ranked recruit Christian Vital leading the charge. I don't think Dan Hurley goes on the recruiting spree he's on now if we stay in the AAC, but I do think UConn returns to the tournament and returns to being a winning program.
Fast forward to the Big East where there is immediate success, building on our AAC momentum. Last year the conference generally had a really bad OOC stretch, the BE anchor Villanova was struggling, and UConn kept it afloat. Let's face it, a few BE teams really bolstered their tournament resume last season by beating us down. I don't have the numbers in front of me but I'd bet that BE average attendance has also been on an upwards trend. The games just all mean a little bit more now, they're a little bit more nationally relevant, and UConn has a part to play in that. Certainly not all of it is because of UConn, because there's some really great coaches and players in the BE, but UConn played an important part.
If it was as easy as just being in the Big East, somebody other than Nova would have won one by now. So thank you Val for inviting us back, and you're welcome Val for bringing home another trophy.
/endrant
It wasn't hurting Geno's team that much, they still won 3 championships (2014-2016) and them made 6 Final Fours including one title game appearance after the 3 championships.It was hurting Geno. At the time of the COVID shutdown he had his worst team since Kerry Bascom. That wasn't coaching.
This is beyond idioticI think we lose Hurley and start recruiting 3 star recruits if we join the big 12
Right now we recruit with the best programs in the country… if we want a player..i have confidence we will get him most of the time… there is a reason for that.. Hurley is a great recruiter and we are the kings of the north east..in a northeast conference..playing our championship games in New York City
We weren't successful because only 2014 could the American be considered a power conference. That season the league had UConn, Louisville, Memphis, Cincy, Temple, Houston, Rutgers, SMU, UCF, and USF.This is what is beautiful, you guys are both sides of mouth. We ALL thought UConn would dominate AAC when we joined, no?
And then first year in we won a Natty. But then the coach checked out (and he did for sure) and then you all say THAT is why we werent successful in the AAC. I will stipulate it was a component. Will you stipulate that the league was terrible for us? Our current NC winning coach actually says that. Is Hurley wrong?
Do you really believe that a game in Hartford or Gampel against BYU or Kansaa St won't draw?The same people vouching for the Big 12 will be the ones blasting fans for not showing up to a 9pm Gampel midweek tip v. UCF, BYU, or Kansas St.
9pm weeknight games don’t fill unless it’s a big game or a rival game. Expect a lot of late tips if we move to this conference.Do you really believe that a game in Hartford or Gampel against BYU or Kansaa St won't draw?
Why? The B12 gets 7 and 9 PM tip off slots, and we'd be one of the few schools in the Eastern time zone. I'd imagine we'd get almost all 7 PM home game tips9pm weeknight games don’t fill unless it’s a big game or a rival game. Expect a lot of late tips if we move to this conference.
How would the 9pm weeknight game against BYU or K St not be a better draw than the same tipoff date and time against DePaul or Butler?9pm weeknight games don’t fill unless it’s a big game or a rival game. Expect a lot of late tips if we move to this conference.
He's intelligent enough to realize that he can't use logic to defend his position so he has to cherry pick specific circumstances where his position can be defended.Why? The B12 gets 7 and 9 PM tip off slots, and we'd be one of the few schools in the Eastern time zone. I'd imagine we'd get almost all 7 PM home game tips
BYU not maybe because that fanbase travels. But I’ll scale back and say it’d be harder to fill XL/Gampel with Kansas St, Texas Tech, UCF, Houston, Colorado (potentially) than it would be to fill it vs. DePaul, St John’s, Villanova, Creighton, Providence, etc. Throw in a bad tip time and you never know.Do you really believe that a game in Hartford or Gampel against BYU or Kansaa St won't draw?
Can’t really guarantee tip slots. We had a slew of garbage tip times in the AAC. I wouldn’t bet the Big 12 prioritizes us from the get go and gives us the best tip times.Why? The B12 gets 7 and 9 PM tip off slots, and we'd be one of the few schools in the Eastern time zone. I'd imagine we'd get almost all 7 PM home game tips
Yes I’m using a hypothetical to combat the hypothetical invitation you all want to an overrated conference, the minute Texas/Oklahoma leave and UCF/Colorado/Houston/Cincinnati join. The last statement is also a hypothetical. There are no facts or logic in this thread.He's intelligent enough to realize that he can't use logic to defend his position so he has to cherry pick specific circumstances where his position can be defended.
I agree the Big 12 isn't going to intentionally give us the best tip times, I'm arguing the opposite. In order to give us a 9PM tip they'd have to inconvenience their own existing schools with early tips that nobody there wantsBYU not maybe because that fanbase travels. But I’ll scale back and say it’d be harder to fill XL/Gampel with Kansas St, Texas Tech, UCF, Houston, Colorado (potentially) than it would be to fill it vs. DePaul, St John’s, Villanova, Creighton, Providence, etc. Throw in a bad tip time and you never know.
Can’t really guarantee tip slots. We had a slew of garbage tip times in the AAC. I wouldn’t bet the Big 12 prioritizes us from the get go and gives us the best tip times.
We were able to pull it off in the AAC playing a handful of B level schools and a lot of C level schools. Doing it for a handful of A level schools and quite a few B level schools while being compensated well above anything we could have hoped for in either the AAC or the BE makes a ton of sense.Yes I’m using a hypothetical to combat the hypothetical invitation you all want to an overrated conference, the minute Texas/Oklahoma leave and UCF/Colorado/Houston/Cincinnati join. The last statement is also a hypothetical. There are no facts or logic in this thread.
Show me the logistics of traveling to all Big 12 schools for all sports. Does that make sense?
Not for home games. Having us play home games at 9 defeats the purpose of the Big 12 having an east coast team. If that's your main objection...9pm weeknight games don’t fill unless it’s a big game or a rival game. Expect a lot of late tips if we move to this conference.