- Joined
- Feb 9, 2015
- Messages
- 1,181
- Reaction Score
- 2,572
Not responding on the subject but I am still upset about the Samson Johnson game. Ok carry on
And, in the big picture, I'm sure what Hurley communicated to Sanogo throughout his recruitment was that he could come in right away, get some minutes, and learn behind senior bigs.I think he has been open with Adama judging from the comments after the last game. Can (and many here do) disagree with the reasoning but Hurley and Adama were publicly on the same page that he wasn't in because St John's was playing 5 out
We would all love if this happened, but per Hurley post game, he’s not even close to being 100% and really shouldn’t even be out there yet according to Hurley. He made it sound like he won’t be at 100% until next season.Lost in all the discussion is Akok. I thought he looked, moved, and played better than the prior Marquette game.
if he can continue to improve he’ll be getting more minutes at the 4 and 3. Whaley was tired at the end everyone saw Polley at his worse.
A fully healthy Akok getting 20+ minutes could’ve been the difference between an L and W against STJ and possiblythe difference against Creighton. If he continues his upward climb
We would all love if this happened, but per Hurley post game, he’s not even close to being 100% and really shouldn’t even be out there yet according to Hurley. He made it sound like he won’t be at 100% until next season.
Regardless, he was out there and I thought he looked better. Doesn’t matter if he’s 100% this year, just keep getting better.We would all love if this happened, but per Hurley post game, he’s not even close to being 100% and really shouldn’t even be out there yet according to Hurley. He made it sound like he won’t be at 100% until next season.
Have we ever played zone under Hurley?I would have gone with the big lineup and play some zone to cover up our defensive deficiencies but Hurly is a stubborn Capricorn and he never changed.
Have we ever played zone under Hurley?
There is like a 99.9% chance they won't play zone vs Creighton. So doubt they would practice it this week.Not much at all, none this year. Just hoping maybe they worked a little on it the last couple days based on some recent history, would be a good idea.
There is like a 99.9% chance they won't play zone vs Creighton. So doubt they would practice it this week.
We did that first year under Hurley but almost nothing since. Without Bouk out there we have to think about going back to it if we are going to play 5 guards at once.Have we ever played zone under Hurley?
Sure flexibility and adaptability is important in the team success this season .There was 99.9% chance they were going to play once vs the Johnnies too. How did that work out? I'm just saying after watching that defensive performance options are a nice thing in order to play the players you need to give you the best chance. Sometimes you need to get away from stubborn. Nose picker has given his teams very little chance to win games or comeback late on larger deficits because he won't get out of the zone. Be flexible!
The point is you play a zone like we could have and should have because they're a poor 3 point shooting team who you want to dare to shoot the ball. Doing that against Creighton is a recipe for disaster because they're a great shooting teamThere was 99.9% chance they were going to play once vs the Johnnies too. How did that work out? I'm just saying after watching that defensive performance options are a nice thing in order to play the players you need to give you the best chance. Sometimes you need to get away from stubborn. Nose picker has given his teams very little chance to win games or comeback late on larger deficits because he won't get out of the zone. Be flexible!
Sure flexibility and adaptability is important in the team success this season .
I just don't see any zone d vs our next opponent under Hurley. So doubt he would use the time this week for it. That doesn't mean it won't be practiced afterwards.
Btw, the Big East teams don't like to throw the zone in general. We faced a lot more vs AAC teams.
His interview with Dom Amore revealed zero admission of any misjudgments on his part and that is more than a little concern. If the players can say they sucked on certain nights, the coach can certainly say they screwed up. To state that Polley was horrible defensively and it threw his offensive game off yet leave him in the last 10 minutes blows my mind.I know we have a million threads on this, but wanted to offer some positive spin. I blame at least 50% of the loss yesterday on Hurley deciding he wanted to be a mail instead of a hammer. When you have the more talented team, you are ALWAYS the hammer, he needs to not forget that.
Here’s my take on it. He already knows he screwed up even if he hasn’t admitted it publicly. He also has too many good mentors to not learn from this (his father, JC, Geno among others). Just like players need to learn from their mistakes coaches do too. Luckily this mistake was learned during the regular season. Don’t let it happen come post season time! The team will learn and move forward. Also, make your damn free throws and your coach doesn’t look so bad.
As long as Hurley is accountable to himself and the team then I don't care what he says publicly.
HIs reasoning that if an opponent goes small all our big men have to come out of the game is downright scary. I would like to hear him clarify that position.As long as Hurley is accountable to himself and the team then I don't care what he says publicly.
HIs reasoning that if an opponent goes small all our big men have to come out of the game is downright scary. I would like to hear him clarify that position.