- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 91,830
- Reaction Score
- 351,493
Isn't he a PWO?
Initially was in 2015, but on scholarship since 2016.
Isn't he a PWO?
Camp hasn't started. Wait until a week before UCF.Read his tweets - it has NOT happened yet
I don’t get the love affair with Bisak. He is a walk-on who works hard but isn’t really that talented and is probably never going to see the field even in mop up duty now that the new red shirt rules are in effect. I thought he might get the Larson role from the early 2000s but now even that seems unlikely.I thought Bisack was gong to play a lot better than he showed in the spring game. He looks the part, throws a decent ball, but it doesn’t seem to come together.
Except this isn't a video game. My guess is that there were some very real and very human considerations that went into naming Pindell starter for the Holy Cross game.I have a few connections with Lackawana and they were all pretty high on Pindell as a player. I think he is a legit FBS Level QB, but IMO the staff made a big mistake anointing him the starter last year and brushing the more established Shirreffs aside. Pindell not surprisingly struggled early and the staff felt they had to call on Shirreffs to salvage the season. The pressure of being the focal point of an offense for a team saddled with a pretty bad defense probably was too much for him early on.
The better move would have been to bring him along slowly behind Shireffs with the possibility of inserting him in games depending on injuries or the team's performance. In that scenario he would have got his feet wet at The FBS Level, gained experience, and still had a season to start. Pindell is a nice bridge QB/stop gap option for a team developing young talent. Hopefully he develops this offseason and comes back ready to go. Let Bisak be number 2 on the depth chart, but have Washington ready to go should Pindell get hurt or struggle. Let the new kid from GA Redshirt and compete for the job next year.
Except this isn't a video game. My guess is that there were some very real and very human considerations that went into naming Pindell starter for the Holy Cross game.
And salvage the season? Even the most cautiously optimistic of UConn fan had to adjusted expectations after ECU and certainly after Memphis.
I don't know the details of Shirreffs health concerns but he still played quite a bit last year including against HC. Maybe he wasn't believed to be physically capable of starting the season? If so then I guess the staff had few options. From the outside looking in it played like a situation where a new OC was going to play his guy to start the season no matter what. When that guy struggled they turned to the previous starter. As for salvaging the season that might be a bit too strong, however I shudder to think how much worse things could have gone had the team lost to FCS Holy Cross in the home opener.
I say let all five QB’s compete for the job THIS year and let the best QB earn the spot. If the kid from GA does get red shirted than at least try to get him in four games so he can get some experience, even if it’s mop up time.I have a few connections with Lackawana and they were all pretty high on Pindell as a player. I think he is a legit FBS Level QB, but IMO the staff made a big mistake anointing him the starter last year and brushing the more established Shirreffs aside. Pindell not surprisingly struggled early and the staff felt they had to call on Shirreffs to salvage the season. The pressure of being the focal point of an offense for a team saddled with a pretty bad defense probably was too much for him early on.
The better move would have been to bring him along slowly behind Shireffs with the possibility of inserting him in games depending on injuries or the team's performance. In that scenario he would have got his feet wet at The FBS Level, gained experience, and still had a season to start. Pindell is a nice bridge QB/stop gap option for a team developing young talent. Hopefully he develops this offseason and comes back ready to go. Let Bisak be number 2 on the depth chart, but have Washington ready to go should Pindell get hurt or struggle. Let the new kid from GA Redshirt and compete for the job next year.
Pindell is what he is. Pretty good and a bridge to Washington/McAfee/kid from Georgia one of whom will be the starter next year. On a pretty good team Pindell looks like a solid qb. One a not so good team he doesn’t. Basically I don’t think he gets you to the next level but he is not bad. I always thought his choice last year was a combination of Lashlee wanting him, Edsall giving Lashlee what he wanted and Sherriffs being a Diaco guy who wasn’t really planning to come back.
At the very least, we can all agree Pindell is really fast. This will make him at least an okay QB.
By this logic Williams could play QB.
Ok, but you can move the ball better with a great/good passer who is an ok runner vs. a great/good runner who is an ok passer.He’s absolutely a better runner than Williams. I get your point, though. What I’m trying to say is that he doesn’t need to have a great arm to be sorta successful
At the very least, we can all agree...
Our defense was too bad to salvage anything last yearExcept this isn't a video game. My guess is that there were some very real and very human considerations that went into naming Pindell starter for the Holy Cross game.
And salvage the season? Even the most cautiously optimistic of UConn fan had to adjusted expectations after ECU and certainly after Memphis.
FB/LB Repollet:
I saw Washington and I really like his arm strength plus I still think is could be the starter if Pindell can’t get the job doneI say let all five QB’s compete for the job THIS year and let the best QB earn the spot. If the kid from GA does get red shirted than at least try to get him in four games so he can get some experience, even if it’s mop up time.
Pindell is what he is. Pretty good and a bridge to Washington/McAfee/kid from Georgia one of whom will be the starter next year. On a pretty good team Pindell looks like a solid qb. One a not so good team he doesn’t. Basically I don’t think he gets you to the next level but he is not bad. I always thought his choice last year was a combination of Lashlee wanting him, Edsall giving Lashlee what he wanted and Sherriffs being a Diaco guy who wasn’t really planning to come back.
The article did not say Krajewski will be the starting quarterback. In fact, it even states Pindell will probably start but that Krajewski should be ready to play if things go wrong. I still say QB2 is wide open and let the best man win. It’s refreshing knowing that we have good talent coming in this year.The Hail Mary sensation I got from that AAC Newcomer piece isn't enough to sell me on a true freshman as the starting QB. It's a terrible idea. I'll take Pindell and whoever else is ready. Give the young man a chance to adjust to a new situation.
My vibe is that Pindell will be better than last year. We already know he has the legs. I hope, and expect, to see further progression in maturity, leadership, decision making, and short/medium passing efficiency. I don't have much hope for an improved long ball. I hope he proves me wrong there.The article did not say Krajewski will be the starting quarterback. In fact, it even states Pindell will probably start but that Krajewski should be ready to play if things go wrong. I still say QB2 is wide open and let the best man win. It’s refreshing knowing that we have good talent coming in this year.