But yet I hear GA has said that you can play well even without shooting well,. Anyway, I agree partly and I do know that AG hasn't been able to show that she can shoot (very small sample size) although GA has said she shows it in practice.
CW has increased her shooting % a bit but 33% is still not good, especially since her shoots are mostly wide open and her game is all about and little about anything else, her increase in defense lately not withstanding. She has been a poor/streaky shooter for 3 years now.
I know GA is riding with CW and have said as much many times., based on his hope that she puts it together and I think he is worried about her loosing confidence as well which is probably why he didn't bench her earlier in the year when he defense was horrendous.
Telling and inferring an interpretation are two different things. People ask the question because they want an direct answer not a question to a question.
I never called any of you 'homers' so it would be good if you just stick to what I said and not exaggerate any. In fact, you should retract that statement. I certainly never criticised posters for agreeing with GA on this one particular issue. So this is a complete misleading and false statement.
I know it can be hard to to not exaggerate because it is natural for all to hide behind a keyboard and try to be more clever than the rest and put them in their place. My favourite is when posters take one sentence out of many and take it out of context and then throw it back at me. Not sure if you have done that...
Actually, the only time I've inferred GA thus far are when posters like to remind me how many championships he has won. BI think that is incredibly stupid and silly. But I never called or inferred anybody was a GA homer!
Then there was this amazing 'magic' that happened on this board surrounding NM. Posters were really criticising the hell out of her and saying she was slow, can't defend, no better than Molly Bent, etc. before being a starter when I kept saying repeatedly she was much better than that. They were also saying if she was any good, GA would play her more. Hmmmm....I remember one poster, when somebody asked about her lack of playing time, the response was that GA wants to win and then so many people liked that response...silly. Then GA makes her a starter and the whole boneyard now recognises her game and loves her. This is the only other time I inferred GA since I disagreed with posters and her lack of playing time.