Except for the part about Calhoun and the NCAA violations. UConn's issues barely qualify as jaywalking compared to what Louisville has faced, not to mention UNC, KU, Baylor, and others.Very fair article
The infractions Calhoun had under his watch was nothing comparing to the gangster hood that was Louisville.Except for the part about Calhoun and the NCAA violations. UConn's issues barely qualify as jaywalking compared to what Louisville has faced, not to mention UNC, KU, Baylor, and others.
Yeah, much respect and very unexpected coming from him.Agreed. It's also probably his most coherent statement related to UConn ever.
Well..it was his failures in those areas that led to losing games. He doesn't have to get into specifics...we all know what goes into winning.
I have said this before...the one thing I always thought was a core Edsall strength was integrity. Wow was I wrong.
Diaco is proving to be a much more genuine person than Edsall. And 5 years ago I would have thought you were nuts if you said that.
Nothing but kudos to Diaco for being forthright. Maybe in time Edsall will be more honest about what happened.
I probably am misremembering....but I never thought of Diaco as a liar. Just a used car salesman. Always a spin.Are you nuts? Diaco lied all the time while he was here and despite Randy's shortcoming he remains the best of the D1 coaches we've had.
It's a nice statement from Diaco, but let's keep things in perspective.
BCU and Pitt were always marginal athletic departments (a few up years, but nothing really notable). I think the only surprising one is Cuse.The Louisville choice was really more about FSU pushing back against Tobacco Road. It sucks, but it is what it is.
When ever I get frustrated on being on the outside and looking in at P5 football, I think to myself would I rather have the financial security of being in a P5 conference than 4 men’s basketball national championships. The answer is a resounding no.
BCU, Pitt and, increasingly, Syracuse have all been marginalized as programs in the ACC. I’m not saying that would’ve happened to us, but it did happen to them.
I couldn't agree with you more. The sad thing is that all they have to do is threaten to pick up and move and they will be able to milk the state again.The timing is a little odd though huh? You can football has been a suck fest all year long, but on the day after we have positive news about a great new coach hire ESPN writes an article talking about how the University of Connecticut is footballs biggest loser.
Conspicuously absent of course is ESPN’s role in the demise of the Big East and Connecticut being on the outside and looking in. Without ESPN funding the raid on the Big East, it never happens in the whole conference realignment debacle never guts college sports. ESPN is a Connecticut company that receives tax breaks from the state of Connecticut. Since they were the financier of the ACC‘s raids against the Big East they could’ve stepped up on our behalf at any time. They did not and that cost Connecticut taxpayers tens of millions of dollars. That should never be forgotten, especially the next time they come hand-in-hand asking for more Connecticut taxpayers money.
And I agree regarding BCU, especially. Pitt was having a good run though, not national championship good, but they were a decent team. Now, not so much.BCU and Pitt were always marginal athletic departments (a few up years, but nothing really notable). I think the only surprising one is Cuse.
I hope not. If it is publicly known that they are asking for more relief, every Connecticut fan should be on the phone to their state legislator telling them that a vote for taxpayer money going to ESPN will mean a vote for whoever runs against them. I’m serious. They’ve cost Connecticut taxpayers, minimally, $35 million a year since 2013. Do the math. It’s $280 million that would have otherwise come into the athletic department. Since the state subsidizes the school, that’s money out of Connecticut taxpayers pockets. ESPN should never see another dollar of taxpayer money until Connecticut is in the P5. ESPN could make that happen with a phone call.I couldn't agree with you more. The sad thing is that all they have to do is threaten to pick up and move and they will be able to milk the state again.
Since she couldn't get into ESPN's culpability in this mess, outside of Diaco admitting he didn't win enough games, the only thing that got my attention was Toscano. My view of him has diminished greatly based off his comments. Wonder if they were altered to fit the narrative.
Except this football season where Pitt leads its division...And I agree regarding BCU, especially. Pitt was having a good run though, not national championship good, but they were a decent team. Now, not so much.
"No comment" would have satisfied the requirement of a non-disparagement clause.Discos buyout includes a non-disparagement clause. Let’s not give him too much credit
Except this football season where Pitt leads its division...
Is it me, or is this a really dumb comment by Toscano? In the middle of a positive PR that changes the narrative that you can football is on the clock, why release the statement? I suspect that the ESPN reporter may have been sitting on that quote for a while. Just a hunch.BOT Toscano comment seems like it was before they hooked Mora (“"If this doesn't work, we're going to have some tough decisions to make," Toscano said. "I'm confident we'll get the right person and we'll find success…”)…
… but it’s fairly consistent w/ what he said back in early September: “If we can’t manage our way out of this, and the narrative is that when we go play FBS teams we get our [butt] kicked, well, that’s not good for anybody and it’s not sustainable,” UConn Board of Trustees chair Dan Toscano said last week. “I just don’t believe that’s going to be the narrative. We’re going to give it some time and see it play out. … It’s not short-term. It’s definitely not long-term. It’s somewhere in the middle. I don’t know if that’s 3-5 years or whatever. We’re going to be impatiently patient.”
Just so we are talking about the same Pitt, you mean the one that lost to Western Michigan, right? And Miami? They are leading their division in a remarkably weak ACC. This is like one of those seasons when Illinois wins the Big 10. They are pretty good but everyone else is having an off year.Except this football season where Pitt leads its division...
Isn't that what I said in first sentence? It doesn't match the sequencing...Is it me, or is this a really dumb comment by Toscano? In the middle of a positive PR that changes the narrative that you can football is on the clock, why release the statement? I suspect that the ESPN reporter may have been sitting on that quote for a while. Just a hunch.
Agreed. Dream isn't over. But crazy to hear those quotes from our coaches and admin of what it was like leading up to the realignment selection.
They really what was on the line in real-time, and could foresee how screwed we would be when we didn't get in.
Extremely devastating for a department that was busting their butt to get in.
Don't hold your breath on Edsall.Well..it was his failures in those areas that led to losing games. He doesn't have to get into specifics...we all know what goes into winning.
I have said this before...the one thing I always thought was a core Edsall strength was integrity. Wow was I wrong.
Diaco is proving to be a much more genuine person than Edsall. And 5 years ago I would have thought you were nuts if you said that.
Nothing but kudos to Diaco for being forthright. Maybe in time Edsall will be more honest about what happened.
Good lord, the disco-apologistas are out. That frigging guy destroyed the program. Read Dan Os quote about the players he left behind. But, he’s an RKG. Frigging unbelievable. I guess he won breakfast todayIntegrity? Diaco gets A+. Edsall gets a F. The only defense I can offer for Randy is that he never should have been hired the second time. He was absolutely the worst case hire.
What? You don't trust Rebecca Lobo?2 things.
Discos buyout includes a non-disparagement clause. Let’s not give him too much credit
Article underscores how FCS our trustees are. They alone give me zero confidence. How there was no blowback on them is incomprehensible. They should have all submitted their resignation.
Meh. I wonder if he walked into Edsall’s office and asked him what happened. Diaco won a lot more games than Randy 2.0."I remember going in his office, shutting the door and being like, 'What happened?' I did not know the program talentwise had fallen off that much," Orlovsky said.
This just hits different.