- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Messages
- 3,772
- Reaction Score
- 3,443
Integrity? Diaco gets A+. Edsall gets a F. The only defense I can offer for Randy is that he never should have been hired the second time. He was absolutely the worst case hire.
Don't hold your breath on Edsall.Well..it was his failures in those areas that led to losing games. He doesn't have to get into specifics...we all know what goes into winning.
I have said this before...the one thing I always thought was a core Edsall strength was integrity. Wow was I wrong.
Diaco is proving to be a much more genuine person than Edsall. And 5 years ago I would have thought you were nuts if you said that.
Nothing but kudos to Diaco for being forthright. Maybe in time Edsall will be more honest about what happened.
Good lord, the disco-apologistas are out. That frigging guy destroyed the program. Read Dan Os quote about the players he left behind. But, he’s an RKG. Frigging unbelievable. I guess he won breakfast todayIntegrity? Diaco gets A+. Edsall gets a F. The only defense I can offer for Randy is that he never should have been hired the second time. He was absolutely the worst case hire.
What? You don't trust Rebecca Lobo?2 things.
Discos buyout includes a non-disparagement clause. Let’s not give him too much credit
Article underscores how FCS our trustees are. They alone give me zero confidence. How there was no blowback on them is incomprehensible. They should have all submitted their resignation.
Meh. I wonder if he walked into Edsall’s office and asked him what happened. Diaco won a lot more games than Randy 2.0."I remember going in his office, shutting the door and being like, 'What happened?' I did not know the program talentwise had fallen off that much," Orlovsky said.
This just hits different.
I think this says as much about Dan as it does Bob. I certainly wouldn't mind if the program and he were estranged for a bit."I remember going in his office, shutting the door and being like, 'What happened?' I did not know the program talentwise had fallen off that much," Orlovsky said.
ESPN and those ACC shills needs come clean, stop lying and tell truth like Flipper did. ("ESPN told us what to do" )Get this ESPN narcissistic passage, "With a lucrative television deal on the table from ESPN, the conference had a chance to solidify its future. But some in the room felt the league could gain more in the open market. So the Big East turned the deal down. Shortly thereafter, the ACC started showing interest in multiple Big East teams."
How dare the Big East turn down the almighty World Wide Leader's money?! That last line should read, "Shortly thereafter, a butt hurt ESPN conspired with the ACC to destroy the Big East."..... EXACTLY
You could be correct but I personally believe that it was ND that approached the ACC. While the C-7 always felt that once the split (which was designed when the conference expanded to 16 after the first ACC raid but never set in stone as \to when it would happen) occurred, ND would remain with the catholic schools, ND had made some comments that would lead one to believe they were trying to align with the football playing members, hoping to be included as a not football participant. Once the BE lost Syracuse and Pitt, the remaining football schools wouldn't be significant enough of a conference and ND still viewed themselves above the other catholic members so they approached the ACC with the idea of adding ND, which would (and did) finally rip the BE apart. Nova (every current BE school owes them a debt of gratitude) had enough success to keep the conference at a high level in the public's eye, which I imagine the ACC never anticipated, but the ND betrayal is something the C-7 never anticipated.I think the ACC has had their eye on the ultimate prize during expansion - Notre Dame. When Pitt was selected for the ACC before UConn, some people speculated that if Notre Dame was ever going to join the ACC, the ACC should try to get some traditional rivals into the conference. Pitt is the 5th most school that Notre Dame has played. That is why Navy (most games played against ND) is rumored to be the 16th school as a football only if Notre Dame joins as you could put Notre Dame in a division with Navy, Pitt, and say BC so that they play tradition rivals in conference.
As for Louisville, they had just been rejected by the Big 12 so they understood the expansion process and they did everything they could to get into the ACC. Unlike UConn's administration, they were not overconfident and left nothing to chance.
All that said, I do think the ACC made mistakes with the schools they selected. They were late to start the ACC Network and it is not carried by Xfinity which is a major loss of revenues. BC athletics don't drive the needle enough for Xfinity to carry the ACCN even though Massachusetts is a major Xfinity state. If the ACC took UConn, I would guarantee you that UConn fans (and Connecticut politicians) would not accept no ACCN in Connecticut. I think adding UConn could help drive the ACCN to be carried by Xfinity. How much revenue for the ACC would that be? Xfinity has ~19 million subscribers. Let's say the ACCN would charge Xfinity $0.50 per sub on average, that would be $114 million in total revenue and assuming the margin for the ACC is 50%, it would increase ACC revenues by ~$57 million per year which more than pays for adding UConn.
Geez Coach… you’ve gotten quite ornery latelyAndrea A$$inine doesn't have the mental capability to have written this tripe overnight. It has been sitting in her desk drawer for a while until she could insert Coach. Mora's name at the time of the hiring announcement. She is just an ESPN Shill & incapable of original thought.
Cantankerous curmudgeon, I've been told that I resemble thT description...lolGeez Coach… you’ve gotten quite ornery lately
Andrea A$$inine doesn't have the mental capability to have written this tripe overnight. It has been sitting in her desk drawer for a while until she could insert Coach. Mora's name at the time of the hiring announcement. She is just an ESPN Shill & incapable of original thought.
That may well be true but what is also true is your assessment of the article. ESPN has been holding onto this in a tickler file for a couple of months, waiting for our announcement of a new head coaching hire so they could throw cold water on our news.Cantankerous curmudgeon, I've been told that I resemble thT description...lol
Laughter is the best medicine.The article’s intention was entirely to limit public enthusiasm towards the Mora hire and take a few swipes (framed to appear as compliments) at us in the process. I personally like that they feel the need to do this and will explain why.
The firm I worked for in the late 1990’s had among their clients Ben & Jerry’s and at our annual conference/dinner in January 1999, asked Ben and Jerry to appear as guest speakers. Jerry started with a humorous story on how they met {the two laziest kids in gym class found each other) and went on to how, once they began selling their product in grocery stores, a major distributor attempted to force those stores to stop carrying their product. Jerry said he was worried that this would put them out of business, but Ben was smart enough to realize that if they were so frightened of Ben & Jerry’s product, it was time to expand.
They (northern ACC schools, ESPN, perhaps the ACC itself) is worried about what we can become and what it will do to them if we get there. The article did reopen a number of old wounds (I still feel Hathaway did more damage than P or Diaco, cringe at the misfortune of BC being on the limited committee that decided in September 2011 to add two BE schools and wish the B-12 would be given the opportunity to reconsider remaining at ten members when UT, OU et al decided to decline the P-12 invitation) but we need to put that behind us.
If Mora succeeds, brings us to where we were the past few years of RE 1.0, some of those schools will be shaking in their boots as from that point, with the people we have in place, we will be able to take the next step forward. If we do that, the schools that the ACC selected instead of us will be in our rear view mirror.
UConn sports is really something. We don't get a sniff of the big-time without JC. Yet, we didn't make it to the big, big-time because of JC. Maybe not only because of JC, but no doubt he was a factor.I love Calhoun, but that was totally a factor. Heard it way back when that “basketball coach is a problem.”
If I recall, there was a lot of media speculation that the infractions we got nailed for were just the beginning and that more would be revealed with time. We weren't known as the UNLV of the East (lol) for nothing. Of course, time revealed that other programs had taken infractions to the next level (and got away with it) cough*UNC*cough.That is as accurate as I have seen.
I love Calhoun, but that was totally a factor. Heard it way back when that “basketball coach is a problem.”
Now, considering what UNC did academically and the fact Louisville is corrupt, kinda rich how it turn out.
But, Adelsen nailed the dynamics.