- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 30,587
- Reaction Score
- 53,109
Go back to the other board, Pom-Pom. Not interested in hysterics or drama.Hey nitwit neither one was looking were they were going ! Clark was the one that ran into the fan.
Go back to the other board, Pom-Pom. Not interested in hysterics or drama.Hey nitwit neither one was looking were they were going ! Clark was the one that ran into the fan.
Yeah, that'd be like a Providence fan injecting himself into a Boneyard thread where the OP was a Boneyarder criticizing UConn fans for singing a Taylor Swift song; and the PC fan doesn't like the song AND doesn't like that PC sings it (too cringey); but he's even more upset about UConn stealing the PC tradition (which is "lame "), because Providence did it first; and it's even worse because UConn won't admit that they're copycats, even though they know it's true, which makes him right in addition to UConn fans being lame ...AND THEY KNOW IT BUT WON'T ADMIT IT.Well it was the fan girls "Home court" Clark was only a "visitor."
I don't know why he's doing this but he's still going.Occam's Razor states that when two competing hypotheses equally explain a result, you should pick the one that requires the fewer assumptions.
My explanation doesn't require any assumptions: I say two people simply ran into each other. Your theory assumes that Clark saw the fan, purposely ran into her, and then faked a reaction (and also that the fan was free of blame).
I have no idea why you say she kept moving in a straight line after the collision. That's not what happened. You can freeze it and see her body is turned immediately upon the collision.
For the record, I said your theory was absurd, not you.
At least she didn't do a Grayson Allen and trip her.Not only does it look like a flop, it looks like she specifically sought out contact.
When there's a laughing emoji, was it funny, or are they laughing at you?So when people give you an angry emoji, are they mad at your comment or the act you're commenting about? Asking for a friend....
And the guy had to endure the wheeling of shame.If I had a nickel for every time I saw a guy in a wheelchair and an "I Love MILFs" shirt interrupt a basketball game, I'd have . . . a nickel.
#zaprudersmilesANDrollsoverinhisgraveNote how Clark is perfectly vertical and has now moved over to the side of the fluffy fan and then shoves her.
View attachment 95521
View attachment 95522
After the shove she takes a then spins, then throws her head back, then falls down. Scroll through the video and watch it framed by frame. It's all there.
Note how Clark is perfectly vertical and has now moved over to the side of the fluffy fan and then shoves her.
View attachment 95521
View attachment 95522
After the shove she takes a then spins, then throws her head back, then falls down. Scroll through the video and watch it framed by frame. It's all there.
she is looking right at her up and through contact.She's looking right at her up and through contact.
View attachment 95517
View attachment 95518
note who ran into whom. The fluffy fan didn't run into Clark, Clark ran into the fluffy fan. Note that Clark's arms are folded in front of her like she is making a block while the fluffy fan is running by her
AgreedShe’s looking the wrong way until less than second before they collide.
She didShowing her looking at the fan a split second before impact
I don't get that she could have stopped on a dime, but I also don't get that as being the suggestionand suggesting she could have stopped on a dime makes no sense to me, as a matter of either physics or common sense.
I think she did something quite different from what you've written directly above.I’d dumbfounded that people think that the best player in college basketball intentionally risked injury—even assuming she had time to plan it in the 0.5 seconds from the moment the fan entered her line of sight.
I found it bizarre did the issue is so important to you. It's fine that it does, but just seems kind of quirky to me, but whatever.I find all of this completely unpersuasive and not responsive to the points I made. She’s looking the wrong way until less than second before they collide. Showing her looking at the fan a split second before impact and suggesting she could have stopped on a dime makes no sense to me, as a matter of either physics or common sense. I’d dumbfounded that people think that the best player in college basketball intentionally risked injury—even assuming she had time to plan it in the 0.5 seconds from the moment the fan entered her line of sight.
I find it bizarre that anyone wants to see this as anything but an unfortunate accident. Two people ran into each other. That’s what the video shows. That’s what happened.
Nope fluffy fan is going by her. Clark ran into her.Ah ... no. They ran into each other. And again, only one had any right being on the court.
Why else does a person shore 45 points in a game?I don't pay attention too much, but that seems a bit conspiracy theory-ish. I know she is good and in the news quite a bit in Women's basketball circles, but is she that much of an attention...seeker?
I found it bizarre did the issue is so important to you. It's fine that it does, but just seems kind of quirky to me, but whatever.
You seem to think she was driving at high speeds when a deer lift out in front of her. She was slowly jogging. She never shows that she startled and, and this is really the undeniable part of it, she basically slips the contact effortlessly, which you insert is impossible, and then shoves the kid. Then after the contact, she snaps her head back like she's trying to draw a foul. There's no way to count for all those things other than the fact that she decided to shove this kid. There's no way to count for all those things other than the fact that she decided to shove this kid.
#occamsrazor
I'm not condemning her for it. I don't really care. I just don't see the point in denying what is so plainly there in each of these videos, whether it's full speed, half speed, or frame grabs. But if you want to, that's fine with me.
I found it bizarre did the issue is so important to you. It's fine that it does, but just seems kind of quirky to me, but whatever.
Posts in this thread:
CL82 = 16
nomar = 6
You walk into people all the time on the sidewalk? I guess that would explain why you're defending with Clark blindsiding the fluffy fan.she put her arms out as a reflexive defense mechanism at the last moment but you just don’t want to accept it. I do it all the time on the sidewalk when I’m about to make contact with someone who’s not looking.
Lol, I haven't blocked you...I was wondering who I had blocked to make this thread unreadable. My bet was on huskywarrior, but cl82 makes sense too.
I was wondering who I had blocked to make this thread unreadable. My bet was on huskywarrior, but cl82 makes sense too.
Lol, make it 19 Tom.Posts in this thread:
CL82 = 16
nomar = 6
Lmaoooo! This is sour grapes and that’s all it is. Yeah the fan shouldn’t be there, but court storming is part of college basketball. Pissed she lost and she easily could of avoided the contact but plays the victim instead. SmhI’m the one who finds this important?
You’re projecting onto Clark your assumptions of what a normal person would do in this situation if moving at 1/100th speed.
The deer did jump out. You can see she doesn’t see the fan until the last moment. Then she shows how startled she is by extending her arms and spinning to minimize the contact. Of course you see that not as her being startled but as evidence of her nefarious intent.
You’ve seen it explained that she put her arms out as a reflexive defense mechanism at the last moment but you just don’t want to accept it. I do it all the time on the sidewalk when I’m about to make contact with someone who’s not looking. There’s no intent to “push” but if they make contact with me that’s what would it look like to someone who wanted to impugn me for no apparent reason.
Lmaoooo! This is sour grapes and that’s all it is. Yeah the fan shouldn’t be there, but court storming is part of college basketball. Pissed she lost and she easily could of avoided the contact but plays the victim instead. Smh
Yes Clark hit the fan shortly after turning her head in the direction of that fan. The implication that contact was unavoidable is where I disagree with you. It is difficult to make judgements on split second reactions.You walk into people all the time on the sidewalk? I guess that would explain why you're defending with Clark blindsiding the fluffy fan.
Speaking of "blindsiding" I found it kind of funny that Clark claimed the "blindsided" her when she's facing the kid before enduring contact in the poor kid gets hit from the side and knocked over.
Look, the video is what it is. Clark hit the kid not the other way around. If you want to be revisionist and say that didn't happen, it's fine, but the video tells a different story.
Actually, Clark pretty much does avoid contact she stops spins to the side the fluffy kid and then shoves her. So it must've been at least somewhat avoidable because Clark avoided it. What I think confuses people is that after the Clark takes a step, does her best Kemba impression with a head snap and throwing her arms in the air spins and falls.Yes Clark hit the fan shortly after turning her head in the direction of that fan. The implication that contact was unavoidable is where I disagree with you. It is difficult to make judgements on split second reactions.
If you slow down the film when KK Arnold dove for the ball in the Seton Hall game hitting Paige in the temple causing a whiplash you would get the same impression she could have avoided that incident. You cannot account for momentum in a slow motion portrayal of an incident.
You walk into people all the time on the sidewalk? I guess that would explain why you're defending with Clark blindsiding the fluffy fan.
Speaking of "blindsiding" I found it kind of funny that Clark claimed the "blindsided" her when she's facing the kid before enduring contact in the poor kid gets hit from the side and knocked over.
Look, the video is what it is. Clark hit the kid not the other way around. If you want to be revisionist and say that didn't happen, it's fine, but the video tells a different story.
You lift your arms up in the city when people bump into you? You must do that an awful lot!I live and work in New York City. No, that doesn't happen every day but, yes, frequently, people walk around looking at their phones and not at their surroundings and on occasion I am forced to move out of the way or extend my arms so they don't crash into my body.
Defenders can get to the spot first and they don't always get the charge call. You're the one who brought up the deer scenario -- you can be completely blameless even though you "hit the deer not the other way around." I'm not blaming the fan. I'm just saying they collided, because they did. I have no axe to grind here. I'm not a WCBB fan, much less an Iowa or Clark fan.
NYC protocol is look straight ahead, arms down and power through the contact.