The OLine and the three Ws | Page 3 | The Boneyard

The OLine and the three Ws

Status
Not open for further replies.
Look -- P has to be allowed to do it his way. And, on O, his way is letting DeLeone do it his way. That's the only way you can fairly judge him.

I think Foley was an outstanding OL coach, and I think it's a shame that he no longer is and that I fear we may lose him for it, but that is all secondary to the prior paragraph. You hire a coach, you give him the chance to do it his way. If Deleone thinks he can teach zone blocking better than Foley, and he has P's support, so be it.
I thought the comments toward Foley were complimentary, yet you seem to be trying to see something else in them. GD is trying to install a pro-type offense, and it starts at the oline. I'm looking forward to the future because I think the foundation is being set for better players to want to be a part of the professional quality of coaching here.
 
Maybe Greg Schiano is a a good coach and will do well in TB. I wish him the best. But honestly, who would you rather have coach Schiano or Bill Parcells. It's a no brainier.

I like Foley and he has done very well coaching our lines, but we have a seasoned coach, an NFL coach, who wants to install his offense and has been doing it for many years. Who would you rather have? I mean this is a no brainier and to waste all this band width as to why DeLeone and not Foley ------ good gracious.
 
Maybe Greg Schiano is a a good coach and will do well in TB. I wish him the best. But honestly, who would you rather have coach Schiano or Bill Parcells. It's a no brainier.

I like Foley and he has done very well coaching our lines, but we have a seasoned coach, an NFL coach, who wants to install his offense and has been doing it for many years. Who would you rather have? I mean this is a no brainier and to waste all this band width as to why DeLeone and not Foley ------ good gracious.

I disagree. I don't think DeLeone has accomplished as an OL coach what Foley did. What Foley did year after year with talent that no one else wanted for the most part was remarkable.

And if you think pro experience by itself makes you a better coach, there must be a lot of mediocre coaches who you think are better than Calhoun. Yeah, right.
 
I disagree. I don't think DeLeone has accomplished as an OL coach what Foley did. What Foley did year after year with talent that no one else wanted for the most part was remarkable.

And if you think pro experience by itself makes you a better coach, there must be a lot of mediocre coaches who you think are better than Calhoun. Yeah, right.
I agree to a certain extent, but P saw this as the best way for the team and to me it makes sense. Not a slight to Foley for sure.
 
I agree to a certain extent, but P saw this as the best way for the team and to me it makes sense. Not a slight to Foley for sure.

I completely agree with your first point, and completely disagree with your second point. Coach P is the head coach, and he is ultimately judged on how the team performs. If he believes Coach Deleone is the best choice for the O Line, then he would be a fool not to make the switch,

But it is absolutely a slight on Coach Foley. He is being demoted, no matter what spin everyone is trying to put on it. We are going to lose him in 2013, I am convinced.
 
I don't know if calling this a slight on coach Foley is correct or not but the leadership absolutely wanted to go in a different direction (in philosophy, blocking schemes) from what was being done under the prior regime and after the past season felt that they would be better served with Deleone teaching what he wanted done than Foley (whose strengths were with a different system).

I will be stunned of Foley is here this time next season. It is a shame as he did very well here but things happen. I remember being disappointed when Coughlin took over as head coach for the Giants and let McNally (who was one of a few bright spots from the prior regime and ran blocking schemes very similar to what Foley runs) go. It took nearly two full seasons to rework the personnel and implement the new system but the Giants ended up with what was viewed by most as the best O-Line in football for a few seasons and was far better at pass blocking than they had been under McNally (not too much of an accomplishment) and was even better at run blocking than they had been (quite a feat).

As sad as I am to see the change (as I was always very impressed with Foley), I am also open minded enough to realize that this could work out for the best. We will need to bring in some very high quality recruits to get this to work at the level we want but this could help our offense tremendously in another year or two.
 
.-.
I completely agree with your first point, and completely disagree with your second point. Coach P is the head coach, and he is ultimately judged on how the team performs. If he believes Coach Deleone is the best choice for the O Line, then he would be a fool not to make the switch,

But it is absolutely a slight on Coach Foley. He is being demoted, no matter what spin everyone is trying to put on it. We are going to lose him in 2013, I am convinced.

This. Exactly.

I reallly don't understand this debate. It is P's call to make, but you can't piss on my boots and tell me it's raining
 
I think the debate is more focused around the word "slight". I'm guessing that this is a situation where, not unlike the Moorhead situation, Coach P has a different philosophy that he wants to use in his offensive scheme. I think the reason why he has kept Foley on the staff, rather than to remove him, is likely due to honoring his dedication to UConn after Edsall bolted (much like the Moorhead situation). Coach P probably wants Foley to land another job (1-AA head coach, etc.) rather than to get rid of him first, and will likely keep a position for him in the meantime (like TE's). That doesn't sound like a slight to me, and it certainly doesn't sound like pissing on a man's boots...
 
I don't have a football background but I do have an extensive business background. In any situation where results matter more than feelings, as in entrepreneurial situations, employees have to be flexible -- especially the most talented and valuable employees. The brightest and best employees are often given lateral moves to expand their experience and prepare them for a larger role.

In this case, it seems the situation is fairly clear. Coach Foley, great coach though he undoubtedly is, lacked experience with the pro-style zone-blocking scheme, and didn't teach it well last year. The team needs to excel at that scheme, and adopting it will pay dividends in the future in helping O-linemen reach the pros (Bill Belichek has said how important it is to draft players with experience playing a similar system) which in turn will help recruiting. To be the best possible O-line coach, Foley needs to learn the scheme and how to teach it from someone with NFL experience. To be the best possible offensive coordinator at some future date, he will benefit from gaining experience with another position such as tight ends.

From DeLeone's point of view, I'm sure he would much rather focus on coordinator duties and leave O-line management to a position coach. Presumably he is taking the O-line for one year only, and will return the responsibility to Foley in a year after Foley has had a chance to learn from him how the zone scheme can best be taught.

We have the testimony of the O-linemen in Des Connor's piece that DeLeone's teaching is really helping them.

While it's possible that Foley took his move as a demotion, it's more likely that Pasqualoni, DeLeone, and Foley see it as a natural part of his personal career progression toward becoming a more complete coach, and a steppingstone toward greater responsibility and success. While the lateral move and the opportunity to witness how DeLeone teaches a zone blocking scheme will advance Foley's career, a continued failure of the O-line to master the zone scheme under his tutelage would have set back his career. From this view Foley's weakness was a lack of experience in pro-style schemes, nothing else, and this year will remedy that weakness. In a year, his standing will likely be higher than ever.

Obviously this is all speculation, I don't know the inner dynamics of the coaching staff. But I think it would be a grave mistake for fans to assume that Foley's move was a demotion. All athletes know that sometimes you have to take a step back in terms of performance in order to acquire the skills that will take you 2 steps forward. This is a similar situation, only in the coaching realm, and the move is laterally rather than down. Step sideways in preparation for a leap forward.
 
That's an excellent post and there is much to be learned from it that extends well beyond football.

With that said, were I a betting man, I think Foley will be on his way next season and P is keeping him around due to the overall loyalty that was shown by the staff during the transition. But, you could be correct as well.
 
While it's possible that Foley took his move as a demotion, it's more likely that Pasqualoni, DeLeone, and Foley see it as a natural part of his personal career progression toward becoming a more complete coach, and a steppingstone toward greater responsibility and success. While the lateral move and the opportunity to witness how DeLeone teaches a zone blocking scheme will advance Foley's career, a continued failure of the O-line to master the zone scheme under his tutelage would have set back his career. From this view Foley's weakness was a lack of experience in pro-style schemes, nothing else, and this year will remedy that weakness. In a year, his standing will likely be higher than ever.

Coach Foley has coached at the collegiate level for 34 years, including a very successful stint as the head coach of Colgate. Wherever he has gone, the run game has been outstanding. I don't think they are preparing him for greater responsibility. Coach P want's his guy in there, and I can't fault him for that.

But it is a demotion. And it will likely result in Coach Foley leaving after the season is up. Which will be a huge loss.

Coach Foley's Bio:
http://www.uconnhuskies.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/foley_mike00.html
 
I think the performance of our offensive line, which was exactly that on many occasions last year, is the key to our success this year. If they can't get the job done it won't matter who's behind center either. Coach Deleone may find himself the focus of a wider range of fans and analysts than is customary compared to the skill positions, for better or for worse because the offense really has more weapons available if the blocking is there. I would have been happy with Foley but if Deleone can implement a scheme where the guys are organized and get to their assignments, I'll be happy even if we don't dominate physically.
 
.-.
The move makes the information flow more efficient. From Deleone to Foley to OL, now Deleone to OL . Less will get lost or misinterpreted. Foley will improve TE play as adjunct to OL. TE is a hybrid postion and it all depends on how the head coach looks at it but it still is a subset of the OL(my view) or Recievers.I do not believe it is a lateral move but one that will help with the overall performance of what the head coach wants to accomplish. Generally if you want to see the staff hiearchy go to the list of coaches in the offiical site. Coach Foley has been placed 3 spots down the list from which he was held in previous years including last year.
 
http://nflfilms.nfl.com/2012/03/02/cosell-talks-the-tight-end-factor/


This was published 3 weeks ago, after the Combine.

As noted. In complete and utter contrast to the concept that a superior would walk into an inferior's office, and say - you stink, I can do the job better than you, you go handle this......or something like that....

I think Coach P sat down with his coachign staff, outlined a plan that UConn is going to build a college football program that is based on pro-style football concepts on both sides of the ball, such that when we recruit, we are putting players into a system that is going to play football, the same way that the NFL plays football, play the game with players that perform in ways that NFL scouts look for...... and football is always cyclical and changing, so you've got to pay attention.

I believe he clearly laid out that the NFL is working around TE position on offense in recent years, and for the foreseeable future. It's definitely not a secret, how important the TE has become. I think the majority of our offense in the near future is goign to involve multiple TE's and multiple lineups with that that position.

I believe P met with Coach F and his entire offensive staff, evaluated his 3 decades plus of experience in recruiting for football in the northeast, and coaching the offensive side of the ball - all aspects, and found that his recruiting knowledge from developing players at all levels of college football, his ability to find and train offensive lineman at the 1-A level, his ability to coach and recruit all aspects of offense, and put him in charge of the most important position on offense when it comes to playing professional football, in a pro-style offense, and challenged him to go out and build the unit within the college football program that produces NFL calibre tight ends. Go out into our recruiting area, that is full of so many athletes - like the kid from the Saints that played basketball for so many years...........as well as football players.....

The TE position is where it's at in offensive football these days friends. I'm more than happy having Coach F in charge.

As a side note, I've been advocating for years that the coach's tape of games be made available to the public. I think football fans would gobble it up. Charge for it. The secrecy around it has long since become useless. People that can get useful info out of a game film, aren't going to be able to tell anyone that's actually game planning week to week..... anything they shouldn't already be able to know. Practice films, scrimmages, etc....off limits.....but games that already have been played and broadcast? I say make coaches film available to fans.

That link above is great place to learn about football. It's one of the very few places you'll see things discussed with the actual film to look at.
 
Here is a decent article on zone blocking from 09, Its not too bad on the tech stuff not too long and tells the goals, reasons why...what type of player best fit ect.

http://www.tomahawknation.com/2009/6/9/900288/understanding-zone-blocking-and


Nice article. Alex Gibbs is not a well liked man among defensive lineman and defensive line coaches, as well as many offensive line coaches. Very polarizing guy. It's not because he's some sort of phenom NFL coach. Alex Gibbs pushes the envelope of cut blocking. A legal blocking technique. The running offenses he's installed, all revolve around zone blocking by the line, and the creation of wide cut back lanes as a back moves laterally, and then picks a lane. Offensive lineman on Gibbs coached teams are taught to go for the legs. The way those lanes are created to be so wide open is by chopping down the backside pursuit by cut blocking the defensive line/LB pursuit.

(i.e. in the Gibbs coached systems, it's very simple - not much thinking. A run play to say, the right side, involves the line moving as a unit to the right togehter, in a way that starts out very much like photo I posted before, with every lineman moving exactly the same way and takign the same steps to get moving like unit..... and then engaging block with the DL, or moving through space to the LB's.....but on that run play to the right...... the left side of the OL is going to go low when going for contact, shoulder pad to thigh pad (but most often heading toward the knees) and take out the legs of the backside of the D, while the play side OL are going chest to chest. THe backside DL's and LB's are going to be visually focused on the OL rather than looking for the ball, and driving their hands down to push those blockers to the ground and try to hurdle them, if they're still on their feet. It's more than enough time for a RB with good patience and vision to find a lane and get through and over scrimmage.

Principle is simple. A defender that is on the ground, can't pursue the play.

But the zone blocking schemes can be very effective, even if you're not cutting down the backside pursuit like a lumberjack.

http://www.chron.com/sports/solomon...ocking-is-legal-but-is-it-ethical-2254311.php
 
FYI: Cut blocking techniques, when done correctly are not dangerous. It's something that can't really be taken out of the game, because it's the only way that say a guy like a 170lb Lyle McCombs can shuffle his footwork in the backfield on a pass play and move laterally to effectively block - say a 235lb LB that has had a 5-10 yard+ head of steam to get moving in rushing the passer on a blitz....and not get flattened by that LB on his way to the QB.
 
Nice article. Alex Gibbs is not a well liked man among defensive lineman and defensive line coaches, as well as many offensive line coaches. Very polarizing guy. It's not because he's some sort of phenom NFL coach. Alex Gibbs pushes the envelope of cut blocking. A legal blocking technique. The running offenses he's installed, all revolve around zone blocking by the line, and the creation of wide cut back lanes as a back moves laterally, and then picks a lane. Offensive lineman on Gibbs coached teams are taught to go for the legs. The way those lanes are created to be so wide open is by chopping down the backside pursuit by cut blocking the defensive line/LB pursuit.

(i.e. in the Gibbs coached systems, it's very simple - not much thinking. A run play to say, the right side, involves the line moving as a unit to the right togehter, in a way that starts out very much like photo I posted before, with every lineman moving exactly the same way and takign the same steps to get moving like unit..... and then engaging block with the DL, or moving through space to the LB's.....but on that run play to the right...... the left side of the OL is going to go low when going for contact, shoulder pad to thigh pad (but most often heading toward the knees) and take out the legs of the backside of the D, while the play side OL are going chest to chest. THe backside DL's and LB's are going to be visually focused on the OL rather than looking for the ball, and driving their hands down to push those blockers to the ground and try to hurdle them, if they're still on their feet. It's more than enough time for a RB with good patience and vision to find a lane and get through and over scrimmage.

Principle is simple. A defender that is on the ground, can't pursue the play.

But the zone blocking schemes can be very effective, even if you're not cutting down the backside pursuit like a lumberjack.

http://www.chron.com/sports/solomon...ocking-is-legal-but-is-it-ethical-2254311.php

Yeah, I think that was the isuue with Johnson's teams at Navy, cut blocking. It was referenced more for definitions and principles i.e. double teaming. Chip Kelly at Oregon has another but its the last i will reference, promise.

http://www.trojanfootballanalysis.com/pdfdocs/oregonruns.pdf
 
.-.
I think the debate is more focused around the word "slight". I'm guessing that this is a situation where, not unlike the Moorhead situation, Coach P has a different philosophy that he wants to use in his offensive scheme. I think the reason why he has kept Foley on the staff, rather than to remove him, is likely due to honoring his dedication to UConn after Edsall bolted (much like the Moorhead situation). Coach P probably wants Foley to land another job (1-AA head coach, etc.) rather than to get rid of him first, and will likely keep a position for him in the meantime (like TE's). That doesn't sound like a slight to me, and it certainly doesn't sound like pissing on a man's boots...

I actually thought (unusual and, typically, problematic ) about this when the change was announced. I never thought "demotion" was the correct definition, nor do I think the word "slight" is appropriate. "It," to me, is a lateral move. Coach Foley was and remains a position coach who, like other PC's, reports to a Coordinator. In fact, Foley is now responsible for an element that PP has, on occasion, stressed as being of primary importance to his offensive philosophy. I don't think PP is the kind of leader that "demotes" people to important jobs.

Just a lateral move that allows a very talented coach to concentrate on a truly important position.
 
I actually thought (unusual and, typically, problematic ) about this when the change was announced. I never thought "demotion" was the correct definition, nor do I think the word "slight" is appropriate. "It," to me, is a lateral move. Coach Foley was and remains a position coach who, like other PC's, reports to a Coordinator. In fact, Foley is now responsible for an element that PP has, on occasion, stressed as being of primary importance to his offensive philosophy. I don't think PP is the kind of leader that "demotes" people to important jobs.

Just a lateral move that allows a very talented coach to concentrate on a truly important position.

The last sentence is wrong. Foley wasn't moved because they wanted him to coach TEs. Foley was moved because they wanted Deleone to coach offensive line.
 
Yeah, I think that was the isuue with Johnson's teams at Navy, cut blocking. It was referenced more for definitions and principles i.e. double teaming. Chip Kelly at Oregon has another but its the last i will reference, promise.

http://www.trojanfootballanalysis.com/pdfdocs/oregonruns.pdf

Everything in that article - is in the snapshot pic I put up of our UConn interior 8 offensive men in 2010 against Vanderbilt, and been discussed here in this thread.

Nice find. That's what college football offense has evolved into, the zone read option.

If you were to talk to say - Gunther Cunningham and Jim Schwartz, you'd get a two hour tirade full of f-bombs and dodging dip spit, about how spread offense/ zone read option, is destroying professional football from both the offensive and defensive side, and it would be hard to argue otherwise once you hear it.

I'm very happy we're going to the NFL style of play on both offense and defense. It's most certainly going to help with recruiting, and NFL scouts are going to pay even more attention to players being coached and developed at UConn.

We'll also be in great position to win a lot of games because of it too.
 
FWIW - I knew I read this somewhere before. Found it. Chip Kelly. UNH '90.

A little yankee conference ingenuity out there in the division 1-A landscape.

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ga-kelly010711















John Perry, who worked with Kelly as receivers coach at UNH, said his colleague always had his eyes open and freely experimented with different sets and plays. If it was out there and effective for someone else, Kelly had no problem incorporating it immediately to keep an opponent off-balance. The two still text on a regular basis to swap ideas and congratulations.

“We might come out one week in five wides virtually the whole game,” said Perry, now the head coach at Division II Merrimack College in North Andover, Mass. “The next week, we might be in a double-wing, looking like Navy.

“Against Villanova, we used 36 different formations and 28 shifts in a 70-play game. That’s what’s kept him on the cutting edge. He’s fearless when it comes to that stuff. He’s got a great deal of confidence that things can work and will work.

“He’s always thinking the game. We could be watching a recruit on TV and the joke was always, ‘Wow, that’s a neat play. That’s in this week.’ He just always wants to give the defense new things to think about.”

Kelly’s UNH offense in 2005 averaged 493.5 yards and 41.7 points per game. It built off a 2004 group that set 29 school records, rang up 5,446 yards and scored at least 40 points seven times.

Still, such feats flew mostly under the radar until former Oregon coach Mike Bellotti gave Kelly his big break. Kelly had visited Oregon in 2005 to pick the brain of then-offensive coordinator Gary Crowton. When Crowton left the Ducks to take the same job at LSU two years later, he recommended the relatively unknown Kelly for the Oregon post. Kelly came to Eugene to run the offense in 2007.

“I’m very proud of Chip and what he’s done,” Bellotti, now an ESPN broadcaster, told the Eugene (Ore.) Register-Guard.

Kelly’s calling card is a dizzying attack that plays at a fast pace. The ’07 Ducks set school standards for scoring and total offense. A year later, they were even better, second nationally in rushing and seventh in total offense and scoring.

In 2009, Oregon elevated Kelly to his first head-coaching job at any level. The Ducks ended USC’s run of seven consecutive Pac-10 titles, going 10-3 with their first Rose Bowl appearance since 1995. Kelly became the first coach in conference history to win an outright title in his first season. The Ducks were sixth nationally in rushing, eighth in scoring and showing no signs of stalling.

Quarterback development has been key. First Dennis Dixon, then Jeremiah Masoli, now Darron Thomas. Kelly just keeps churning them out.

“He has taught me a lot,” said Thomas, a third-year sophomore. “At first, he was my offensive coordinator. I was in the room learning from him in the quarterback meetings. Coach Kelly is one of those guys who just wants to score, and that’s what an offense wants to do.

“He is a football guy to the heart. He watches every game, any game. If we are having meetings, he pushes them up so we can go watch a game. Each game he sees as a teachable moment.”

So fast are the Ducks that one opponent this season, California, resorted to feigning injury to try and slow them. So staggering are the numbers, you need a calculator to keep up.

• 537.2 yards per game.
• 303.5 yards rushing per game
• 233.7 yards passing per game.
• 49.3 points per game.

The only number that matters now is one: Kelly has the school a win away from its first national championship.

Like many coaches, Kelly, 47, lives and breathes the game 24-7. He’s a bachelor with a focused football mind. Still, Perry said Kelly’s value for friendships and relationships is the thing that separates him from others.

“The No. 1 thing is he is very loyal person,” Perry said. “He stayed at New Hampshire 15 years. He’s engrained in Oregon now, where I’m sure he’ll be for a long, long time.

“He told me before my wedding he couldn’t make it because he was out of town at a camp. He showed up in the last hour because he knew it was important to me. So he made it important to him. He cares.”

Kelly comes across as all business all the time. He has become known for his ever-present backpack and sometimes sports glasses, looking more the part of campus nerd than big-time football coach. What does he do for fun? Perry said Kelly’s an avid golfer, long off the tee though prone to struggles with the putter. He surprised his staffmates at UNH with his crafty play on the basketball court.

“I don’t know how much he plays now, but he was good,” Perry said. “We would play at lunchtime. He’s an avid runner. He’d be up every morning when we were roommates and go for a run. He used to talk about those moments being times when he’d be able to free think and do his own thing.”

Just three days before playing for college football’s Holy Grail – the BCS crystal ball – Kelly reflected on how far he has come.


Darron Thomas is the third QB Kelly has groomed into a star for the Ducks.
(Jason O. Watson / US Presswire)

The biggest difference between New Hampshire and Oregon?

“They drive too slow [in Oregon],” Kelly said.

Did he ever think he’d have a team on this stage, playing for it all?

“I had no idea,” he said. “I don’t think any coach does. You each have different paths and you end up taking them. An opportunity comes and you just weigh is it better than the situation you’re in. To me, it doesn’t mean anything different. You just want to win.”

In contrast to other coaches who spend much of their careers trying to climb the ladder, Perry said Kelly would have been content to continue beating the likes of Rhode Island, Maine and Massachusetts at UNH. Scheming and victories, not status, is all that has ever mattered.

“I think being a great football coach is the only thing that’s driven him,” Perry said. “I think if he was the offensive coordinator at UNH right now and he was part of teams that were winning championships and having great players, he would be perfectly happy.

“The rest of the world should be grateful that we see him at this level because now everyone gets to see how good he is.”

With so much focus on what Oregon will need to do to counter Heisman winner Cameron Newton and the Tigers’ offense, Perry said Auburn should be wary of what Kelly might have tucked under his visor.

“I know a lot of people are talking about Cam Newton, but I’m wondering how Auburn is going to stop them,” Perry said. “The thing that’s fun about watching them is you can see that moment in the game when everything turns Oregon’s way. At that point, it’s just like, ‘Look out.’ “

In an interesting twist, Kelly and Auburn defensive coordinator Ted Roof have matched wits twice before, when Kelly was at UNH and Roof was coordinator at Massachusetts. In 1995, UNH edged UMass 32-29, and in ’96, UNH rolled 40-7.

Kelly doesn’t read much into that.

“Did I look at the tape, no,” Kelly said, laughing. “Because I think the UMass defense is a little different than Auburn’s, and I know that the New Hampshire offense is a little different than Oregon’s.”

The SEC has claimed four consecutive national championship rings, and Auburn is seeking one for the thumb. It may just take a guy with roots in the former Yankee Conference to stem the South.

Chip Kelly could be that guy.
 
.-.
FWIW - I knew I read this somewhere before. Found it. Chip Kelly. UNH '90.

A little yankee conference ingenuity out there in the division 1-A landscape.

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ga-kelly010711















John Perry, who worked with Kelly as receivers coach at UNH, said his colleague always had his eyes open and freely experimented with different sets and plays. If it was out there and effective for someone else, Kelly had no problem incorporating it immediately to keep an opponent off-balance. The two still text on a regular basis to swap ideas and congratulations.

“We might come out one week in five wides virtually the whole game,” said Perry, now the head coach at Division II Merrimack College in North Andover, Mass. “The next week, we might be in a double-wing, looking like Navy.

“Against Villanova, we used 36 different formations and 28 shifts in a 70-play game. That’s what’s kept him on the cutting edge. He’s fearless when it comes to that stuff. He’s got a great deal of confidence that things can work and will work.

“He’s always thinking the game. We could be watching a recruit on TV and the joke was always, ‘Wow, that’s a neat play. That’s in this week.’ He just always wants to give the defense new things to think about.”

Kelly’s UNH offense in 2005 averaged 493.5 yards and 41.7 points per game. It built off a 2004 group that set 29 school records, rang up 5,446 yards and scored at least 40 points seven times.

Still, such feats flew mostly under the radar until former Oregon coach Mike Bellotti gave Kelly his big break. Kelly had visited Oregon in 2005 to pick the brain of then-offensive coordinator Gary Crowton. When Crowton left the Ducks to take the same job at LSU two years later, he recommended the relatively unknown Kelly for the Oregon post. Kelly came to Eugene to run the offense in 2007.

“I’m very proud of Chip and what he’s done,” Bellotti, now an ESPN broadcaster, told the Eugene (Ore.) Register-Guard.

Kelly’s calling card is a dizzying attack that plays at a fast pace. The ’07 Ducks set school standards for scoring and total offense. A year later, they were even better, second nationally in rushing and seventh in total offense and scoring.

In 2009, Oregon elevated Kelly to his first head-coaching job at any level. The Ducks ended USC’s run of seven consecutive Pac-10 titles, going 10-3 with their first Rose Bowl appearance since 1995. Kelly became the first coach in conference history to win an outright title in his first season. The Ducks were sixth nationally in rushing, eighth in scoring and showing no signs of stalling.

Quarterback development has been key. First Dennis Dixon, then Jeremiah Masoli, now Darron Thomas. Kelly just keeps churning them out.

“He has taught me a lot,” said Thomas, a third-year sophomore. “At first, he was my offensive coordinator. I was in the room learning from him in the quarterback meetings. Coach Kelly is one of those guys who just wants to score, and that’s what an offense wants to do.

“He is a football guy to the heart. He watches every game, any game. If we are having meetings, he pushes them up so we can go watch a game. Each game he sees as a teachable moment.”

So fast are the Ducks that one opponent this season, California, resorted to feigning injury to try and slow them. So staggering are the numbers, you need a calculator to keep up.

• 537.2 yards per game.
• 303.5 yards rushing per game
• 233.7 yards passing per game.
• 49.3 points per game.

The only number that matters now is one: Kelly has the school a win away from its first national championship.

Like many coaches, Kelly, 47, lives and breathes the game 24-7. He’s a bachelor with a focused football mind. Still, Perry said Kelly’s value for friendships and relationships is the thing that separates him from others.

“The No. 1 thing is he is very loyal person,” Perry said. “He stayed at New Hampshire 15 years. He’s engrained in Oregon now, where I’m sure he’ll be for a long, long time.

“He told me before my wedding he couldn’t make it because he was out of town at a camp. He showed up in the last hour because he knew it was important to me. So he made it important to him. He cares.”

Kelly comes across as all business all the time. He has become known for his ever-present backpack and sometimes sports glasses, looking more the part of campus nerd than big-time football coach. What does he do for fun? Perry said Kelly’s an avid golfer, long off the tee though prone to struggles with the putter. He surprised his staffmates at UNH with his crafty play on the basketball court.

“I don’t know how much he plays now, but he was good,” Perry said. “We would play at lunchtime. He’s an avid runner. He’d be up every morning when we were roommates and go for a run. He used to talk about those moments being times when he’d be able to free think and do his own thing.”

Just three days before playing for college football’s Holy Grail – the BCS crystal ball – Kelly reflected on how far he has come.


Darron Thomas is the third QB Kelly has groomed into a star for the Ducks.
(Jason O. Watson / US Presswire)

The biggest difference between New Hampshire and Oregon?

“They drive too slow [in Oregon],” Kelly said.

Did he ever think he’d have a team on this stage, playing for it all?

“I had no idea,” he said. “I don’t think any coach does. You each have different paths and you end up taking them. An opportunity comes and you just weigh is it better than the situation you’re in. To me, it doesn’t mean anything different. You just want to win.”

In contrast to other coaches who spend much of their careers trying to climb the ladder, Perry said Kelly would have been content to continue beating the likes of Rhode Island, Maine and Massachusetts at UNH. Scheming and victories, not status, is all that has ever mattered.

“I think being a great football coach is the only thing that’s driven him,” Perry said. “I think if he was the offensive coordinator at UNH right now and he was part of teams that were winning championships and having great players, he would be perfectly happy.

“The rest of the world should be grateful that we see him at this level because now everyone gets to see how good he is.”

With so much focus on what Oregon will need to do to counter Heisman winner Cameron Newton and the Tigers’ offense, Perry said Auburn should be wary of what Kelly might have tucked under his visor.

“I know a lot of people are talking about Cam Newton, but I’m wondering how Auburn is going to stop them,” Perry said. “The thing that’s fun about watching them is you can see that moment in the game when everything turns Oregon’s way. At that point, it’s just like, ‘Look out.’ “

In an interesting twist, Kelly and Auburn defensive coordinator Ted Roof have matched wits twice before, when Kelly was at UNH and Roof was coordinator at Massachusetts. In 1995, UNH edged UMass 32-29, and in ’96, UNH rolled 40-7.

Kelly doesn’t read much into that.

“Did I look at the tape, no,” Kelly said, laughing. “Because I think the UMass defense is a little different than Auburn’s, and I know that the New Hampshire offense is a little different than Oregon’s.”

The SEC has claimed four consecutive national championship rings, and Auburn is seeking one for the thumb. It may just take a guy with roots in the former Yankee Conference to stem the South.

Chip Kelly could be that guy.

I need a second opinion from the board on this. When he posts something like this, which goes on and on and on with no real contribution or relevance to the discussion, is he just playing with us? And I'm to curmudgonly to get that it's all a joke?

That must be what it is.
 
I need a second opinion from the board on this. When he posts something like this, which goes on and on and on with no real contribution or relevance to the discussion, is he just playing with us? And I'm to curmudgonly to get that it's all a joke?

That must be what it is.

No. I think he's saying we should dump P and hire Chip Kelly, but only if Gary Crowton isn't available.
 
No - before some nitwit takes this discussion and puts in major media.....the connect the dots thing is a frigging joke. The article is not - it was published last year in january.

I posted that article b/c Duncan's link, made me think of it, and I looked for it. I wonder how many people actually read that article and then went back and looked at the photo I put up. Anyway in response, to something that clearly looks like an exceprt from a Chip Kelly coaching clinic on the zone-read, I posted an article on said coach, that is related to UConn football, in that same coach - who's argueably THE guy responsible for the offensive system that dominates the football world right now, and was our bread and butter play for several years, was developed by a guy that coached offense in teh Yankee conference for 15 years, and stood on the same sidelines, at Memorial stadium, while at least a few people around here, were there.

Is it relevant to the topic? SInce when does that matter around here? This discussion started out as a discussion about the direction of our offensive line, and a bunch of questions about how and why lineman could possibly having trouble with their blocking assignments......and BL turned it into a personal testimony for Coach Foley and lament on the offensive line move in the coachign staff.

The concept that a guy like P, would run a football organization, that has a guy like Coach F involved, in the northeast US, in college football, and not treat him with complete and utter respect and value with what he's done and is capable of doing, is well frankly....as foolish as thinking that a division 1-A football player is going to intentionally waive themselves off the field on game day becuase they feel tired....or as ridiculous as a saying that a division 1-A football player doesn't like 'contact'......

It's somethign to read in the spring, while football is being practiced.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,277
Messages
4,561,072
Members
10,454
Latest member
Uconn84


Top Bottom