Huskyforlife
Akokbouk
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2013
- Messages
- 13,464
- Reaction Score
- 58,212
/thread
Are you referring to the SINGLE grammy that was stripped from them?
/thread
Are you referring to the SINGLE grammy that was stripped from them?
Meh! As long as he remembers to wipe the white powder from his nose before he gets on stage.Bruno Mars should do every halftime show by himself from now on, he's the best at this stuff since Michael Jackson.
Not a fan of any of them.Just out of curiosity, are you a fan of any of them regularly? Because as a casual observer who doesn't care about any of them, Coldplay was the best performance during halftime. Bruno was OK too, but Beyoncé was absolute garbage. The song was horrible and her singing wasn't any better. Reminded me of the abomination the black eyed peas put on during halftime 5 years ago.
This song (syncopated wubs in breaks of a remixed old song) won a Grammy.Are you referring to the SINGLE grammy that was stripped from them?
This song (syncopated wubs in breaks of a remixed old song) won a Grammy.
as did this
And John Mayer has won three Grammys himself.
Would you like more examples?
Long story short: you use scrub metrics that are at best popularity contests for determining quality music. Or maybe you put more weight in Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Slime Awards.
And I'm refuting your championed idea that popularity is any real marker of talent, for which you have no retort.Well I never referenced the Slime Awards, which are a joke. Grammy's are not a joke.
I guess we can agree to disagree. Coldplay is a world class band, with a large following, as seen by their location on Billboard charts, which is directly influenced by people interest. Beyonce is only up there for looks. Bruno Mars is a legitimately talented performer.
Coldplay have written popular song after popular song, whether you like it or not.
Milli and Vanilli won a Grammy. But hey, that automatically means they were legit, right?
The pointThat has to be the beer talking
You are comparing a group with many platinum albums with a bunch of druggies lip synching?
OK - lets now compare and place UConn on the same stage as CCSU
This has to be one of the most inane statements I have seen
And I'm refuting your championed idea that popularity is any real marker of talent, for which you have no retort.
You must love the Baskstreet Boys and N*Sync. Popular song after popular song. They should do a reunion Super Bowl halftime show.
You're right. Your opinion trumps the world.And I'm refuting your championed idea that popularity is any real marker of talent, for which you have no retort.
You must love the Baskstreet Boys and N*Sync. Popular song after popular song. They should do a reunion Super Bowl halftime show.
You've missed the entire point. My liking or disliking them has never been a part of this.You're right. Your opinion trumps the world.
Coldplay has talent. Stop basing your assumptions on a few performances here and there and the same songs that are played on the radio. Go listen to their first 3-4 albums. Go listen to In My Place, Trouble, Don't Panic, Amsterdam, Charlie Brown, Shiver, Yellow (pretty popular).
Just because you don't like them doesn't mean they lack talent. That's just ignorance.
If it's not about your own judgment of them and it's not about the "scrub metrics that are at best a popularity contest," then what's it about? I think you misplaced your own point a few posts back.You've missed the entire point. My liking or disliking them has never been a part of this.
You're right, I am missing your point, because you have made several points indicating a distaste for Coldplay under the thread entitled "The Official Coldplay Sucked Thread". I can't tell if you are saying the music industry sucks, Coldplay sucks, or standards for good music sucks. Sounds like all of the above.You've missed the entire point. My liking or disliking them has never been a part of this.
That Grammys and Billboard Awards are not a necessary nor sufficient qualifier for talent; which I would hope, in your world, is itself a qualifier for performance on the Superbowl halftime stage.If it's not about your own judgment of them and it's not about the "scrub metrics that are at best a popularity contest," then what's it about? I think you misplaced your own point a few posts back.
Still missing it. See the above post.You're right, I am missing your point, because you have made several points indicating a distaste for Coldplay under the thread entitled "The Official Coldplay Sucked Thread". I can't tell if you are saying the music industry sucks, Coldplay sucks, or standards for good music sucks. Sounds like all of the above.
Let me ask you something, is Coldplay talented by the holy, great standards of Rocktheworld?
You must love the Baskstreet Boys and N*Sync. Popular song after popular song. They should do a reunion Super Bowl halftime show.
That has to be the beer talking
You are comparing a group with many platinum albums with a bunch of druggies lip synching?
What other metrics are there to use to determine a SB halftime performer other than awards and popularity?That Grammys are not a necessary nor sufficient qualifier for talent; which I would hope, in your world, is itself a qualifier for performance on the Superbowl Halftime stage.
Or maybe it isn't.
Not sure I care enough to take this discussion to the place it's heading; that is, the philosophical validity of the Super Bowl halftime show.What other metrics are there to use to determine a SB halftime performer other than awards and popularity?