It's not your job to get believers to sign on - it's your job to make the non believers believers. That's when the magic happens. I was a non believer when "Winning" was announced. I was all in by the end. That was a brilliant campaign. This one had no legs.
My mojo is typically off the charts. I thought everything about yesterday was weak.
Then nothing that you post does. That’s a rule one of the mojo.
I never believed anything I posted had any effect on the teams play. I’m sitting on my couch....they’re on the court.
Unexpected loss hangover...everyones lives will go on. Eventually.
And since you never believed it, it doesn’t.
When I’m there in person screaming my head off with thousands of others, I am a true believer. Just can’t make that leap to a message board. That’s why I don’t make inane lineup or coaching suggestions...I just read everyone else’s.
And so your posts don’t matter. I’m agreeing with you.
In the context of making the team win, you are correct.
I don’t care who believes or doesn’t believe. I only control what I can control.
Which is not much from all appearances.
Maybe you should lay some blame off to your hangman.
Which just happens to be the annual hanging and sentence. You can’t victory dance when it all comes together and then throw your hands in the air and say “it’s not my fault“ when it doesn’t.
Has Swami really done anything for years? He’s good for what a couple of posts annually? He needs to be out there enforcing the sentence.
I’m not sure you understand that is exactly how it works.
Yeah, yeah. The post loss finger pointing. All part of the Judge’s life here.
That’s fair, because I am growing increasingly concerned you don’t either.
You know, it would be OK to say “Tom Brady? What the hell was I thinking? I’ll do better next year.”
The poison is strong in this one. Maybe light a lavender candle to sooth your inner hate.
LOL, my God, you can’t admit it can you? That’s too funny.
Interesting that you don’t get it.
Here we can find some agreement. Charlie Sheen was a great idea and timely and it was adopted by the board. Tom Brady was a sucky idea in those some of us tried to prop it up as best we could but bad is bad. Your job as judge is to pick some thing that interesting and engaging. Your argument is essentially “ I picked a study of 18th century French poetry as our mojo rallying cry this year. It’s not my fault if people didn’t run with it.“
I like eighteenth century French poetry.
There was such an obvious choice. So obvious.
Ahhhh but there's where you're wrong. Charlie Sheen was no more timely or any greater of an idea. He seems as such because they won. And it was adopted by the OLD board. Not the newbie mouth breathers running rampant here now.
LOL, I doubt many people would pick up on your Rimbaud puns.I like eighteenth century French poetry.
