- Joined
- Aug 24, 2015
- Messages
- 582
- Reaction Score
- 2,230
Did i hear Geno calling Dangerield 'Z' in the clip from practice? Or did I misunderstand him?
Z is Stevens.Did i hear Geno calling Dangerield 'Z' in the clip from practice? Or did I misunderstand him?
Oh ok! I guess that makes sense - thanks!Z is Stevens.
And I'll bet she let him have it afterwards too. But within a few days of practice and games she knew he was right. That's why he's in charge.I agree. It is subtle but she sits up straighter and starts this subtle shaking of her head - her dangly ear rings get going.
And I'll bet she let him have it afterwards too. But within a few days of practice and games she knew he was right. That's why he's in charge.
Exactly. He knows there's fire in there and he's bringing it out. And once she sees what she can do with that fire she's gonna be a b***h for teams to handle.Keep in mind that people say Geno has mellowed compared to the olden days. So if he says stuff like that now, imagine what he was like in 2005 or 1995, eh?
I'm not worried about KLS based on what I saw there. When I look at her, it seems to me that she has an interesting edge to her that doesn't always come out. I can see it in the way that she celebrates after getting hammered while completing a play. Geno is trying to make it come out on command.
This edge (or the potential for it) is IMO one of the things that separates her from a lot of players with similar builds and skillsets.
Honest question for people who know more of UConn history than I: would it be terribly amiss to describe KLS as "Strother with a chip on her shoulder"? I wasn't really watching closely in the Strother years. But I do feel that KLS is nursing a real chip on her shoulder. Watch out when it develops properly.
I actually agree with you for the most part. Obviously the producer is after what they're all after, ratings and eyeballs. IDK if this is how UConn wants it shown or if they have no say.That may or may not be true. And, yes, if you grew up as a little girl loving UConn WCBB and following the saga and listening to the grads and observing the rites of passage and the shared tears of the master and the pupil, then you come to the UConn program prepared to get between the anvil and Geno's hammer. I felt there was too much sharing of the hammer blows on TV and that opinion is unchanged. Not a big deal. Not wanting anything different in the program. BTW didn't think any better of Saniya being shown thrown out of practice last year.
I agree. In many, many ways women are tougher than men.Some fans think that because the players are female they rate a different, gentler treatment, apparently to include no public displays of criticism by a coach. Does that mean that whenever a coach gets in a players knickers on the sidelines the camera should cut away and any video instantly erased? Or maybe the players should get to vote on what gets telecast. Stop the game, let the players review the tape and vote on whether it can be shown.
I had no problem with any of it except the apparent reaction shot of Lou. That was unnecessary and obviously stirred emotions in many people the program can do without. As to that, I share your opinion.I felt there was too much sharing of the hammer blows on TV and that opinion is unchanged.
I had no problem with any of it except the apparent reaction shot of Lou. That was unnecessary and obviously stirred emotions in many people the program can do without. As to that, I share your opinion.
Reading the thread, I kept thinking of the corporate workplace analogy. You chew people out. You do it behind closed doors, or you do it in a meeting of peers, or you translate it for public consumption. You don't broadcast a facial shot of the humiliated chewee to your customers.
I actually agree with you for the most part. Obviously the producer is after what they're all after, ratings and eyeballs. IDK if this is how UConn wants it shown or if they have no say.
I was okay with the video as a whole. Lou mentioned somewhere that she can be stubburn at times, and I know Maya was, it was mentioned somewhere that Stewie was - I think that can be said about alot of sucessful people. If you remember in one of Megan Walkers interview she mentioned she was stubborn and so was Geno.
But I'm pretty sensitive as well and can understand how it could be hard to watch some parts. Geno reminds me of a boss I had once - I accomplished so much working with him, he taught me alot. He went on to build a large company and moved on to better things but boy was he tough to work for.
Ann was a very good player. Lou is taller and stronger (I think the latter) and can/will be a great player. Lou is already an elite shooter.Keep in mind that people say Geno has mellowed compared to the olden days. So if he says stuff like that now, imagine what he was like in 2005 or 1995, eh?
I'm not worried about KLS based on what I saw there. When I look at her, it seems to me that she has an interesting edge to her that doesn't always come out. I can see it in the way that she celebrates after getting hammered while completing a play. Geno is trying to make it come out on command.
This edge (or the potential for it) is IMO one of the things that separates her from a lot of players with similar builds and skillsets.
Honest question for people who know more of UConn history than I: would it be terribly amiss to describe KLS as "Strother with a chip on her shoulder"? I wasn't really watching closely in the Strother years. But I do feel that KLS is nursing a real chip on her shoulder. Watch out when it develops properly.
Jalen may be able to defend himself... Spreewell-style!Would people feel the same way, e.g. protective of the players, if the clip were of Kevin Ollie and Jalen Adams (a sophomore guard on the men's team)?
It's called The Geno Auriemma Show, so I suspect he has a lot of editorial control if he wants it. Not so sure about the in-process All Access piece, but also suspect they wouldn't agree to that without some say-so on the final product. In both cases, at minimum everyone is aware the cameras are running.I wonder if all or part of the video shot was cleared with Geno, the SID, or the AD Dept. before airing.
I thought the "priceless" part of the video was when at the practice Geno turns to Shea, looks at her and she walks away.
#Nastyfor2hours
Geno said that they allow SNY's cameras to be around the program as much as they are because they trust SNY. There was an interview with Geno about this earlier in the season where he elaborated a bit more than what I wrote.It's called The Geno Auriemma Show, so I suspect he has a lot of editorial control if he wants it. Not so sure about the in-process All Access piece, but also suspect they wouldn't agree to that without some say-so on the final product. In both cases, at minimum everyone is aware the cameras are running.
I do think KLS has a little "nasty" in her. I assume Geno would like to see that more often.Honest question for people who know more of UConn history than I: would it be terribly amiss to describe KLS as "Strother with a chip on her shoulder"? I wasn't really watching closely in the Strother years. But I do feel that KLS is nursing a real chip on her shoulder. Watch out when it develops properly.
And therein lies their problem.imagine the players that never recovered from the Geno tongue lashing... not everyone is KLS, Rebecca or Wolters.
Maybe this will help some understand how the "lack of confidence" happens with UConn players
the dressings down to both male and female band members took place in front of the other 100 members of the band, all of the instructors, and parents. The band director lit into them at the National Parade in Washington DC a couple years ago in front all the other bands that were there. so, while not exactly national tv (neither is SNY, by the way) my son has gotten chewed out in public. But whenever I asked if he wanted to quit, he looked at me like I was crazy.Do you think that you would have felt the same if the band director's comments had been broadcast to tens of thousands of people on TV throughout the state and nation, including a close-up of your son listening to the spiel?
It still seems to me that most of those who are defending Geno (needlessly) are missing the point that a few of us are trying to make: it may be a legitimate and successful coaching technique to say such things to your players, and they certainly know what they are in for when they come to UConn, and yes, they are strong and can take it. But whether those moments should be televised to a huge audience of fans is another question entirely. I doubt whether UConn players or their parents sign up to have their weaker moments broadcast to the world, and I don't know what is gained (for anyone) by doing that. It is as much or more a criticism of SNY as of Geno, although I assume they both decided that this was OK to show.