Yes. I'm sure losers support lower standards.
The expanded College Football Playoff off to a rough start
- Thread starter nelsonmuntz
- Start date
So the number 1 team should have no problem beating the number 8 team right oh wait so now your saying it's unfair because Oregon got destroyed.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 27,872
- Reaction Score
- 38,902
Nothing “low” about being one of the top 16. Good grief.
I'm sorry I disrespected a hypothetical 24th ranked uconn that would be invited to the broader more expansive tournament. What shall my penance be, sir?
Husky25
Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2012
- Messages
- 18,635
- Reaction Score
- 19,667
When
No. 2, I'll cross that bridge when it shows on the horizon. I.e. no time soon.
They just had their first winning season since 2010. I'm rooting for a major conference affiliation, but they will never be considered as an Independent.
They have to straighten out the CFP timeline. Everything else falls into place.
1st of all, the playoffs will expand. The P4 can't help themselves.
No. 2, I'll cross that bridge when it shows on the horizon. I.e. no time soon.
They just had their first winning season since 2010. I'm rooting for a major conference affiliation, but they will never be considered as an Independent.
They have to straighten out the CFP timeline. Everything else falls into place.
Getting very defensive there, don't need to play the victim.
Only possible access to an unaffiliated improving program like ours is more participation. Competitors compete, unless they don't get a chance, ie are denied access.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 93,248
- Reaction Score
- 365,732