The expanded College Football Playoff off to a rough start

[UConnDan97]

Alternatively, it could also be argued that teams with the bye were at a disadvantage, therefore eight was the proper number, eliminating byes.

We're all really good at arguing...

 

[Patman]

Alternatively, it could also be argued that teams with the bye were at a disadvantage, therefore eight was the proper number, eliminating byes.

Just as mathematical principle I've never thought teams on byes are at a true disadvantage over having to play a consequence game and risk losing but 3 weeks or so may be too long

 

[ShakyTheMohel]

 

[MilliniumPrince]

The only thing that matters are the ratings numbers. That is what this is all about.

 

[SubbaBub]

The quality of the games in the later rounds vs. earlier shows us that 12 was too many.

!2 is too many if you only want teams that can win. it's perfect if you want to be sure all the teams that can win it are in.

There are six bowl games available to whittle the field down to the final two. That means 2 semis and 4 quarterfinal games at minimum. Why 6, because the 6 bowls control the playoff so it isn't changing. That means the playoff will be 8, 10, or 12 teams. 10 is out because there is no way the conferences will allow 2 teams (Big champ and SEC champ) a free pass to the semi-final and the P2 would never allow a team like ND or an undefeated ACC team to claim a free pass either. SO, its 8 or 12.

With 8, you only get 3 at larges (2 if you allow ND access), that wasn't worth expanding from 4. The P2 wanted the ability to win at least 3 spots each. To do that you need more at large bids, so 12 it was. 16 would mean more first round blowouts, so again 12.

The first round games and a good number of the quarter finals will be blowouts until the talent and NIL money consolidate to the top 12-15 programs. Until then, the home games will keep the interest very high for those games,

The problem will be the quarter and semi finals, Having traveled to 2 this year I can tell you it was an effort. Last minute flights, accommodations, is tough to do in terms of schedule even if you can afford it. Other commitments prevented us from going to the semis and final. I can't imagine the regular programs being able to sell those mid-round games for an extended number of consecutive years.

 

[Husky25]

Home teams have won through 4 games of Wildcard Weekend by a 17.5 point average. No one is calling for revamping the playoff?

Although WSH is up 7-3 on the road in the mid 2nd qtr.

 

[Palatine]

16 is the right number. Then seed them. Exactly like every other division in college football.

That doesn't leave any deserving team out. You won't get a Cinderella every time. But when you do it's a huge story.

 

[Husky25]

16 is the right number. Then seed them. Exactly like every other division in college football.

That doesn't leave any deserving team out. You won't get a Cinderella every time. But when you do it's a huge story.

Define, "Deserving."

I don't think a deserving team was left out this year. To wit, 12 is the correct number.

 

[ZooCougar]

16 is the right number. Then seed them. Exactly like every other division in college football.

That doesn't leave any deserving team out. You won't get a Cinderella every time. But when you do it's a huge story.

Going to 16 is the smart play. Also don’t have so much time in between games.

If you don’t go to 16 then just fix the seeding and who gets byes.

 

[Patman]

Going to 16 is the smart play. Also don’t have so much time in between games.

If you don’t go to 16 then just fix the seeding and who gets byes.

I'd be fine with the current bye system but we absolutely need re-seeding and even possibly allow bye teams to play each other in the quarters

 

[Husky25]

16 is too many.

I agree with to much time between the end of season and playoff as well as too much time between rounds. The National Champion used to be determined on Jan. 2. Then it was pushed back a week. We are at the end of January at this point. It's too long.

 

[storrsroars]

I'd be fine with the current bye system but we absolutely need re-seeding and even possibly allow bye teams to play each other in the quarters

I still think 8 teams is fine. 16 is way too many. But if they stay at 12, then what I'd propose is no byes the first week so there are no teams with 3+ weeks of rest in the next round. You'd have six winners, top two remaining seeds get the bye the following week.