The expanded College Football Playoff off to a rough start | Page 8 | The Boneyard

The expanded College Football Playoff off to a rough start

Bomber36

Respect All, Fear None.
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
8,015
Reaction Score
18,064
Oregon looks awful today. 1st time I’ve seen them play and I certainly wasn’t expecting this garbage.
 

Bomber36

Respect All, Fear None.
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
8,015
Reaction Score
18,064
No Oregon was screwed. They shouldn’t be playing Ohio st yet when they are a 1 seed. When Penn st and Texas had easier opponents so far.
They seem to be screwing them selves with their lack of ability to stick with a team they already beat once this year.
 
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
849
Reaction Score
2,317
They picked the right teams. The seeding was a disaster. Boise St didn’t beat a single P4 team all year. They should have had to play thr first weekend. It would have been a good game against Indiana or Clemson.
 

Purple Stein

I like to sim things.
Joined
Jul 9, 2017
Messages
2,084
Reaction Score
9,056
Agreed - the first round should be labeled a "play in" round to clarify that it is really the 4 weakest teams. Indiana/Tennessee or Boise/Indiana would have been fun.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,823
Reaction Score
35,054
The CFP has been an unmitigated failure. Not only has it given us 6 boring games out of 7, but it has highlighted the biggest problem with college football, the huge number of blowouts among teams at the top, that no other system could have illustrated as clearly.
 

UCFBfan

Kings of New England!
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
6,125
Reaction Score
13,497
When you look at the brackets before anything is done, you should see Oregon where Boise is. PSU is there with SMU and Boise and has the easiest path to the semis. Two G5 (sorry SMU is now P4) schools? I agree with others that there needs to either be a reseeding or something else because there's no reason Oregon should be facing OSU in their first game.
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Messages
4,100
Reaction Score
14,585
Why blitz on 4th and 13? Anyone who has even played Madden or EA NCAA Football knows you drop back on 4th and 13 that close to the end zone.
I didn't understand that either when I was watching in real time. On 4th and 13 I would think it is better to rush only 3-4 and drop 7-8 into coverage. That's what most teams would do and they would have a few guys at the sticks.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,823
Reaction Score
35,054
I didn't understand that either when I was watching in real time. On 4th and 13 I would think it is better to rush only 3-4 and drop 7-8 into coverage. That's what most teams would do and they would have a few guys at the sticks.

Texas couldn't go over the top against a 2 deep that close to the end zone, so just drop 2 safeties back, and play either a zone or man under it because 13 yards gives the coverage a lot of time to close on anything caught underneath. Getting a first down on 4th and 13 with 7 or 8 dropped back in coverage is very, very difficult. Getting a first down against a telegraphed blitz, less so.
 

Husky25

Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
18,606
Reaction Score
19,631
I can't tell whether it was ironic or unfortunate that I turned off Texas/ASU to watch UConn blow out DePaul?
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
9,371
Reaction Score
31,691
They probably need to seed by overall rankings regardless of who won their conference title game. They do that and Oregon is playing the winner of Boise St / Indiana instead of OSU.

Screen Shot 2025-01-02 at 11.44.16 AM.jpg
 

Purple Stein

I like to sim things.
Joined
Jul 9, 2017
Messages
2,084
Reaction Score
9,056
They probably need to seed by overall rankings regardless of who won their conference title game. They do that and Oregon is playing the winner of Boise St / Indiana instead of OSU.

View attachment 105924
I think you're right, but just to play devil's advocate, if the final four were all chalk people would be complaining about that, too.

We just had the number one seed knocked out in the quarterfinals. Upsets are good (if they're allowed to happen)!
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,661
Reaction Score
56,225
They probably need to seed by overall rankings regardless of who won their conference title game. They do that and Oregon is playing the winner of Boise St / Indiana instead of OSU.

View attachment 105924

I would keep the conference-champ-byes but reseed for the QFs.

12 ASU v 1 Ore @ Rose
5 ND v 4 PnSt @ Peach

9 Boise v 2 Ga @ Sugar
6 OhSt v 3 Tex @ Fiesta
 

Online statistics

Members online
432
Guests online
2,347
Total visitors
2,779

Forum statistics

Threads
160,666
Messages
4,237,952
Members
10,091
Latest member
wrocki01


.
Top Bottom