- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Messages
- 17,017
- Reaction Score
- 67,755
A not necessary foul but definitely not intentional foul.
I was at that game. Quite a memory!Nice "Meet Audi Crooks" game for the national audience. The Sunday game of Crooks up against Brinks is the matchup nobody east or west of Iowa knew was something they need to see. Obviously Audi can't go from 40 versus Brinks but she will totally relish the challenge.
At least we Cyclones won't likely see a repeat of Jayne Appel going off for 46 points versus ISU like in 2009. Just known as "The Jayne Appel Game" or the "Jayne Appel Defense Game" among Cyclone fans. We famously, at least among ISU fans, elected to try and stop the rest of the team while not doubling down on Appel as she would "get her points anyway".
The problem to me is the word "intentional". No problem with that type of contact being a technical, but the description for this type of infraction is horrible. A lot of people take to it too literally because they likely don't know the rule itself.I swear, when they first implemented it, ANY contact above the shoulder was an automatic T. It didn't matter if there was intention or not. I don't know when they changed it. It's probably gone through several rounds of tweaking. Anyway, regardless of intention, that was quite a direct shot from an elbow to the face.
No she didn't. When talking to press she said she's been dealing with migraines. Says she should be fine for Monday.I don't think Stuelke played in the second half. She was ineffective in the first half. Clark didn't shoot the ball very well. Didn't matter, Iowa rolled.
And Clark just missed a triple double, needed 2 more rebounds.
Really, Kaizen?A not necessary foul but definitely not intentional foul.
3s starting to fall and Ejim is having a field day. The rout is on.UC Irvin trailing the Zags by 5 at half. Gonzaga 2-14 from 3
At least Middle Tennessee took out Louisville; that's been the only upset of the entire tournament so far. Otherwise all chalk. FGCU came extremely close to winning a 12-5 game for the 3rd consecutive year, but OU squeaked by.Overall, this Tourney is not serving very well for those who lobby for more mid major teams to be included in the field. Just not doing much.
Yeah a few close but not quite games. Heartbreaker for FGCU.At least Middle Tennessee took out Louisville; that's been the only upset of the entire tournament so far. Otherwise all chalk.
The narrative that's really being blown up is the "parity" narrative. The underdog p6 teams seeded 9 through 12 haven't won a single game.
It hasn't been a great year for mid majors overall, outside of Gonzaga. Princeton had the next best chance as a 9 seed but played a poor second half against WVU. Richmond put a scare into Duke before fading badly.
Did I hear them say that they're "optimistic" she'll be ready for Monday's game?Uh oh: Betts out for UCLA tonight with a right foot injury.
A two year old might not know that the rules defining what's an "intentional" foul don't have much to do with the player's intentions. A Twitter poster might not know either.
I see his follow up was to say he thought it was accidental. Even if it was, it still could qualify as an intentional foul. I wish NCAA WBB would change the terminology back to "flagrant" to make it less confusing.
never a doubt!You called it.... though your prediction looked a lil bleak in the first half.
This has had me thinking about the portal's effect on mid major performance in the NCAA tournament. I wonder if this is caused by the best players on the mid major teams going to power five schools. Those players are going to the nation's top programs ruining team chemistry and letting the rich get richer. So many upsets are fueled my diamond-in-the-rough players or overlooked talent staying for four years at a mid-major and building a team around them. But now we have annual turnover, causing mid-majors to start from scratch each season. As you said, I think this will result in less upsets in the round of 64 but more upsets in the round of 32 where the top brands who poached the best players start facing one another.I've seen the stat that the higher seeded team was 31-1 in the first round (the exception being MTSU, Hailey Van Lith knew it). I actually think it makes sense as I do feel like the top 25 or top 30 teams this season were really good. I thought the higher seeds were just better. I didn't see too many upsets, like a lot of ppl felt Utah was vulnerable. I know it was close but ppl felt the same about Oklahoma. But both teams had super quality wins this year so it was hard for me to see them losing in round one. Following that logic though I do expect to see some upsets in the second round but we'll see. I think this round will be where the parity in the woman's game shows.
I was shocked that Green Bay did not play better. Usually they are hitting their shots, cutting harder, and playing aggressive defense. The Lady Vols are good but Green Bay made them look like 10 times better. But it is all about the matchups and Tennesse got one that worked in their favor. Great game by Tennessee.Tennessee had a very impressive win today. If I’m in their bracket I’m feeling a bit nervous.
Yep. I am a huge Michigan fan and I have never understood the draw of Coach Arico, especially when it comes to recruiting, skill development, and offensive and defensive systems that she runs.Also, congrats to Kansas! Glad to see Michigan sent packing (could only stomach them during the Naz Hillmon days). Kim Barnes Arico is someone who is praised ad nauseam for her coaching prowess (I agree with that in terms of how her teams play defensively), but her teams do not seem to be very poised offensively down the stretch in games (and they can be very hard to watch on offense if their 3-point shots are not falling). If they don't have a big enough cushion to hold on at the end, they aren't going to beat you. We found out today that a 10-point 4th quarter cushion against Kansas was simply not enough.