- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 595
- Reaction Score
- 434
We struggle to recruit in an AQ, and you want to take your chances outside of the AQ's?AQ be damned I'd prefer to be Indy for FB over that conference.
Can we get serious?
We struggle to recruit in an AQ, and you want to take your chances outside of the AQ's?AQ be damned I'd prefer to be Indy for FB over that conference.
But look at what Utah has done to Pitt when they play them. Utah is far better than Pitt. Boise St. and BYU are as well. They are on a similar level to WVU but I think most of the last few years WVU would not have beaten either of them.
We struggle to recruit in an AQ, and you want to take your chances outside of the AQ's?
Can we get serious?
The problem is that we'd likely have to play a very poor home slate, and play all of our tough opponents on the road. It would kill attendance.I'm totally serious. It would be my preference. We would have no problem with scheduling a national slate. I think all options need to be considered. We all know that this ridiculous conglomeration is a marriage of convenience and we would be whoring ourselves out to another conference anyway. How long do you think we would stay in this conference?
I would swap out Memphis for Southern Miss.
I'm totally serious. It would be my preference. We would have no problem with scheduling a national slate. I think all options need to be considered. We all know that this ridiculous conglomeration is a marriage of convenience and we would be whoring ourselves out to another conference anyway. How long do you think we would stay in this conference?
It doesn't matter how long I think we'll be in the conference. What matters is that the football program is in a BCS conference, because if it isn't you can forget going head to head with Pitt, Cuse, RU and BC for recruits.
We need to recruit the North East's best. We don't win enough battles as it is, and I can promise you, if we were to find ourselves outside of the AQ, this would not improve.
The problem is that we'd likely have to play a very poor home slate, and play all of our tough opponents on the road. It would kill attendance.
It doesn't matter how long I think we'll be in the conference. What matters is that the football program is in a BCS conference, because if it isn't you can forget going head to head with Pitt, Cuse, RU and BC for recruits.
We need to recruit the North East's best. We don't win enough battles as it is, and I can promise you, if we were to find ourselves outside of the AQ, this would not improve.
Recruits care about exposure and TV time. As an independent with freedom to schedule everyone we would at worst be even to media exposure with this hodge lodge and likely better. Not to mention we would sell out season tix and likely expand the rent sooner this way. Show me a national TV deal for this new conference and I'll change my mind but until then I think I'm willing to give-up the AQ (assuming that this new conference would keep it anyway) to be Indy for FB
Nutmeg show me where this new conference has been promised its AQ status. I think an indy UConn could negotiate some bowl tie-ins. Obviously not bcd bowls but the goal would be to increase exposure and growth of the UConn fb brand to get invited that much sooner. All I'm saying is that Indy may b a viable option given for UConn.
Independence isn't an option! What is so hard to understand?
No TV contract.
No BCS Access.
No Bowl Tie-Ins.
Scheduling becomes anightmare.
I love how you can just say, well we can schedule home and homes so easy.
If we can't do that from a BCS platform what makes you think as an Independent would could make that work?
Independence would look like:
Army
Navy
UMass
Buffalo
Temple
Rutgers (maybe)
Toledo
Akron
Ohio
Then after the home and homes above we could sign 3-1 deals with teams like NC State, Baylor, Iowas State or Wake Forest.
Con husk Bask tone it down. No need for personal attacks. Day one we would have home and homes with our old conference mates and several other bcc teams so I think you overstate that part. I already agreed that the bcs tie in is a problem and im presupposing that we would negotiate some. If we couldnt hen indy would probably die but i hope our admin is onsidering it. Dude you guys are assuming that this abortion would get a tv deal I'm not buying that. No one in Dallas gives a hoot about smu. Ucf will deliver households? Come on.
Really nutmeg you're in the UConn admin? We disagree fine. This proposed conference won't make me travel to most of the away games that's for sure.
AQ be damned? I am not overly excited about what is going on but indy is just about the worst possibility of any choice.AQ be damned I'd prefer to be Indy for FB over that conference.
AQ be damned?
Independence would look like:
Army
Navy
UMass
Buffalo
Temple
Rutgers (maybe)
Toledo
Akron
Ohio
Then after the home and homes above we could sign 3-1 deals with teams like NC State, Baylor, Iowas State or Wake Forest.
it's probably a BB move. Memphis has had good football at times. It's hard to maintain w/o being in an AQ conference.The Times article didn't mention all of the specific teams listed in Nutmeg's post. I would swap out Memphis for Southern Miss. Even though Hattiesburg is a pain in the neck to get to, Southern Miss. is a much more competative program. (I don't believe that the Big East would see any influx of FedEx $$ with the addition of Memphis).
give them an AQ and watch.Based on what?
I don't see how any of these schools are better at football than WV and Pitt.
Actually, you give them whatever the hurl they want . . .I also agree with Heartbeat that BYU and Boise State should be given full membership.