- Joined
- Feb 18, 2016
- Messages
- 3,646
- Reaction Score
- 12,025
Trying to soft-peddle Tennessee's, and Pat's and Wharlick's failures. This statement is nonsense:
"But look at the broader picture and realize that the run of dominance the Lady Vols were on just wasn’t sustainable. Tennessee has been plenty successful since 2000 and has even won back-to-back championships since then."
Well, Connecticut has had a long run of dominance during that same period in which other universities have created great women's basketball programs. UConn hasn't suffered through a period of eight straight years of failing to make the final four, as has Tennessee. So the suggestion that Tennessee had to decline as the WCBB landscape "evened out" is hogwash.
Further, suggesting, as this author does, that "Tennessee is still the most prestigious program" is absurd. Just begin to tick off the superlatives for UConn and Geno Auriemma and you see that Connecticut is by far the "most prestigious program" in women's basketball, and has been for years: three longest winning streaks in WCBB history; 200 weeks at #1 in the nation in the polls, compared with 136 weeks for UT; undefeated in ten NC games; highest winning percentage of any coach in WCBB history. I'll just stop there.
The bottom line is that neither Pat nor Holly was getting the best out of the talent they had, new talent is taking a pass on Tennessee, and while new programs are coming into prominence (Louisville, South Carolina, a resurgent Notre Dame), Connecticut hasn't suffered the same decline as has Tennessee. Connecticut's "run of dominance" hasn't been affected by those other programs' success.
The problem is in Knoxville, not in the evolution of the women's game.
"But look at the broader picture and realize that the run of dominance the Lady Vols were on just wasn’t sustainable. Tennessee has been plenty successful since 2000 and has even won back-to-back championships since then."
Well, Connecticut has had a long run of dominance during that same period in which other universities have created great women's basketball programs. UConn hasn't suffered through a period of eight straight years of failing to make the final four, as has Tennessee. So the suggestion that Tennessee had to decline as the WCBB landscape "evened out" is hogwash.
Further, suggesting, as this author does, that "Tennessee is still the most prestigious program" is absurd. Just begin to tick off the superlatives for UConn and Geno Auriemma and you see that Connecticut is by far the "most prestigious program" in women's basketball, and has been for years: three longest winning streaks in WCBB history; 200 weeks at #1 in the nation in the polls, compared with 136 weeks for UT; undefeated in ten NC games; highest winning percentage of any coach in WCBB history. I'll just stop there.
The bottom line is that neither Pat nor Holly was getting the best out of the talent they had, new talent is taking a pass on Tennessee, and while new programs are coming into prominence (Louisville, South Carolina, a resurgent Notre Dame), Connecticut hasn't suffered the same decline as has Tennessee. Connecticut's "run of dominance" hasn't been affected by those other programs' success.
The problem is in Knoxville, not in the evolution of the women's game.