UcMiami
How it is
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 14,185
- Reaction Score
- 47,205
Most zones have two weak areas - foul line and short corner - they are the borders of two of the zones, and stress either/both the perimeter and the restricted area near the basket. Whatever has happened in HS, most top end college teams don't play a lot of zone so college teams don't have as much experience attacking a zone, and a lot really struggle doing more than trying to shoot over the top of it.I think the idea of "because teams haven't seen it" is a debatable topic. Most kids in America (unfortunately) grow up with 2-3 zone. It's easy to teach. Here in Alaska, nobody plays man-to-man. (til I do next season) Remember how Arkansas torched us off the dribble. It's partly because young players don't know man-to-man fundamentals. An absolute tribute to all concerned at UConn that they developed defensively over the course of the season.
I think what seems to be hard for kids is the art of flashing to the middle, getting the ball there, and making good decisions from the middle. I think next year I am going to concentrate heavily on those skills. 1) the timely cuts to the gaps 2) pivoting, especially toward the basket, hi-low 3) wings relocating to openings for jumpers, defense loses track of them 4) skip passes. I had a player last year that was really good at cutting to those gaps and making plays. He missed that shot a lot though.
Syracuse zone also made Christyn's driving and cutting game less effective than it has been recently. It also makes standard screening offense less effective.
And Uconn's zone last night was very effective at stopping Cardoso's offensive onslaught. Syracuse had a hard time just getting the ball into her hands once Uconn went primarily zone.