ConnHuskBask
Shut Em Down!
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 8,971
- Reaction Score
- 32,883
FWIW - George O'Leary was the Head Coach at Georgia Tech from 1994-2001.
No. Their state had more babies than UConn. Only reason for the invite was absence of birth control and that literally **cked UConn!They fought their way into the B1G. And we have more conference championships than they do.
Does that mean we need to tell the ladies on here to get to work??No. They're state had more babies than UConn. Only reason for the invite was absence of birth control and that literally **cked UConn!
Absolutely!Does that mean we need to tell the ladies on here to get to work??
Don't forget the Big 12.If the rumor is true it makes the most sense for Virginia or Cuse! I don't see North Carolina or Georgia Tech playing in a northern conference.
FWIW - George O'Leary was the Head Coach at Georgia Tech from 1994-2001.
I said "probably". Our market is a very attractive one.We are definitely not a lock for the ACC no matter what happens.
Nobody would care if the B1G took BCU or Georgia Tech. I think UNC is choosing between the SEC, ACC and B1G now. When they pick, the next round of dominoes start falling.
ACC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current Big "East".So we're probably a lock for the ACC. Big ****ing whoop. Let's aim higher.
B!G>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>current and future ACC!ACC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current Big "East".
I was pressing on the > for quite some time!^Exactly.
Yesterday was a bad day for us. The more I've reflected on it, the more I'm coming to believe that it will be a watershed event in the history of UConn athletics, and not in a good way.
I'm not as convinced about BC myself; I am very convinced about UVA.BCU is NOT going to the Big 10. UVa and UNC, and the Big 10 would be crazy not to add them.
We'd probably get passed over for Cincy, USF or UCF.
If the B1G is expanding that quickly again, and if it's an ACC school, I have to believe that it's UVA for the reasons several have stated. It is the best B1G candidate in the ACC, and that is a reason for the B1G to act this quickly.
If the B1G is adding more than one, I think BC is a very real possibility. I think it's a terrible pick, even putting bias aside, but I have a bad feeling that it could be true. Kansas would be a much better pick in all respects, but I agree that Kansas will not leave KSU behind, so that makes them a non-starter for the B10. BC would explain Delaney's Southern New England comment, and I also think--as much as I don't agree with it at all--that BC conjures images of a poor man's Notre Dame for some people. I think they are far worse than that, but I know that there used to be some mention of BC as "Notre Dame East" back in the day, and perhaps that is in the mind of the B1G folks, many of whom suffer from Notre Dame envy and are obsessed with trying to destroy it for not joining the B1G.
Not to continue the Debbie Downer thoughts, but I'm also inclined to believe that the ACC would likely continue to look south for replacements.
Yesterday was a bad day for us. The more I've reflected on it, the more I'm coming to believe that it will be a watershed event in the history of UConn athletics, and not in a good way.
If you consider USF and Cincy the old big east, I agree.only thing that will happen if unc and va do go b1g is acc will look like old big east plus a couple teams