I assume Prince isn't your thing, but I have to chuckle at Prince = "safe", even in that social environment. And not like he wasn't still relevant. Three years off a hugely successful tour of Musicology that impacted how distribution/concert finances were handled.
As to the post directly above, yeah, maybe the Foos could do it, but Bon Jovi or Dave Matthews? lolz.
You liked the baby sharks, eh?
2005 - Sir Paul McCartney
2006 - Rolling Stones
2007 - Prince
2008 - Tom Petty
2009 - The Who
2010 - Madonna Cirque, Nicki Manaj, and Cee Lo Green
I didn't say Prince was "safe." I said he was among the "Safe Wake." Purely from an entertainment standpoint, whatever he did was not going to rise to the level of a nip slip, nor do I think that most people watching the Super Bowl could care much less about how concert finances are distributed.
It's been 28 years since the halftime show went to it's current format of live music concerts, as a result of FOX airing
In Living Colour opposite Super Bowl XXVI halfetime. There were only 3 major networks, 2-3 "minor (UHF)" networks, a maximum of 54 other (yet more or less, niche) channels, and no Internet or streaming services to compete with the Super Bowl.
FOX took 22 Million viewers from the broadcast in 1992. Maybe it's time for the NFL and their broadcasting partners to either revert or think outside the box on Halftime entertainment. Make it Must-See again.