PacoSwede
Creeker in fact
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,436
- Reaction Score
- 7,762
Lots of interesting observations.
Bottom line for me is that I think the coaches can come up with a winning strategy and UConn has the players to implement it in almost any game (perhaps not against the Olympic team).
So, I don't worry about the best approaches to winning, though these commentaries are good reading. Geno's not perfect, but he's proved he's the very best in figuring out how to win, and am sure he'll figure out for the Baylor game too. I'm sure he'll find a way to do it with the players he has.
Bottom line, then, is whether the players adhere to his plan, which they generally will if they keep their poise, and how efficiently they play -- i.e., shooting reasonably well, avoiding TOs, not missing assignments.
High efficiency and poise also determine the level of enjoyment fans take from a game: If the kids lack them, it's a "bad" game even when they win by 50 points (such as Fairleigh Dickinson). If there is great poise and efficiency, a loss is far easier to take (hey, the other team simply was better -- it happens -- as opposed to the Huskies "giving it away.")
Against Baylor, I'll be satisfied if the Huskies are efficient and have poise, even if they lose. With poise and efficiency, I like their chance of winning, though being on the road will be a big handicap.
Bottom line for me is that I think the coaches can come up with a winning strategy and UConn has the players to implement it in almost any game (perhaps not against the Olympic team).
So, I don't worry about the best approaches to winning, though these commentaries are good reading. Geno's not perfect, but he's proved he's the very best in figuring out how to win, and am sure he'll figure out for the Baylor game too. I'm sure he'll find a way to do it with the players he has.
Bottom line, then, is whether the players adhere to his plan, which they generally will if they keep their poise, and how efficiently they play -- i.e., shooting reasonably well, avoiding TOs, not missing assignments.
High efficiency and poise also determine the level of enjoyment fans take from a game: If the kids lack them, it's a "bad" game even when they win by 50 points (such as Fairleigh Dickinson). If there is great poise and efficiency, a loss is far easier to take (hey, the other team simply was better -- it happens -- as opposed to the Huskies "giving it away.")
Against Baylor, I'll be satisfied if the Huskies are efficient and have poise, even if they lose. With poise and efficiency, I like their chance of winning, though being on the road will be a big handicap.