- Joined
- May 6, 2015
- Messages
- 1,142
- Reaction Score
- 2,896
I was going to go with Inyatkin, but I thought that was reaching.A boneyarder comparing brimah to a taller version of Ed Nelson , I think we've reached a breaking point here folks.
![Smile :) :)](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png)
I was going to go with Inyatkin, but I thought that was reaching.A boneyarder comparing brimah to a taller version of Ed Nelson , I think we've reached a breaking point here folks.
If it's not beyond the realm, it's stood up on it's thin end, at the very further outreach of the realm, teetering toward falling out of the realm, with a stiff wind blowing outward.
Three year stats, frosh to Junior:
BOARDS 3, 4.4, 4.6
BLOCKS 2.3, 3.5, 2.7
POINTS 4.1, 9.1, 6.5
ASSISTS .3, .2, .1
FG% - about the same all 3 years.
What about any of those stats suggests that Brimah has made any improvement in any area of his game, other than free throws (at which he is remarkable good now).?? Not one thing.
For all intents and purposes he is a taller version of Ed Nelson.
To be clear, I love the kid and the fact that he is with us, but to expect even a few more ppg or boards or anything next year is wishful thinking, at best.
Get some facts and come back and see me.....he played in Turkey, the Ukraine and Lithuania. Not exactly vacation spots. And certainly not where any aspiring basketball player wants to be. Khalid didn't have much choice, Hamilton potentially did.Khalid's spent roughly 10 out of 13 years in Europe. France and Germany seem like pretty nice places to play ball compared to others.
What? No hamilton would've fit great next year with adams at the point. And Gilbert won't be starting. If he does it'll be middle of the year. Larrier at the 3 with purvis at the two and adams at the oneIt's not addition by subtraction, but the team may have an overall better composition without DH.
He was a nice starting piece (point forward) to build a team around, but I'm not sure we had the other pieces to integrate with him except Brimah.
I'm optimistic about having a more traditional college line up.
Starting 5
AG-1
JA-2
RP-3
KF-4
AB-5
Not fazed by the Hamilton news - still think next year's team is going to be very good.
With Larrier and Vance coming, if there was one position where wecould afford a defection, it was the wing.
I think it may free the ball up more and allow the guards to dictate more of the game and the pace. I expected Jalen to be the star of next year's team and this may actually help him.
Not worried about this at all- I think it's a mistake for Hamilton, but less of an issue for the team. (Timing is so odd...he either got great feedback, bad advice or is just winging it.)
Still worried about rebounding, though. I'd like us to do more of it next year.
I can only assume you think the team would be better with Hamilton's shaky handle monopolizing the ball ? The kid, for all his talents, is not the point guard he thinks he is. His rebounding will be missed FAR more than his ball handling.This is crazy talk.
We are a terrible rebounding team with Hamilton.
Who's going to handle the ball? Jalen and Freshman Gilbert for 40 minutes each?
We struggle to score and rebound and lost our best player in both those categories.
Sure Hamilton had his flaws and I'm not saying we'll suck... But this is lunacy.
Get some facts and come back and see me.....he played in Turkey, the Ukraine and Lithuania. Not exactly vacation spots. And certainly not where any aspiring basketball player wants to be. Khalid didn't have much choice, Hamilton potentially did.
And this...
Remains an depressingly dumb take.Superjohn said:Hamilton is a jack of all trades who isn't good enough at any one trade.
Yeah, interesting comparison, too. Daniels was a far more polished AND far more accomplished player, with those accomplishments coming on teh biggest stage. And yet, he has not sniffed the NBA. Hamilton's stock in the NBA is a substantial bit below DanielsAgree with this.
Are we worried that hamiltons tenuous draft stock hurts the brand at all? I guess it didn't matter much with deandre, but thats one thing I always consider if someone decides to leave earlier than anticipated.
Wait, Kevin Freeman still has eligibility left!?Starting 5
AG-1
JA-2
RP-3
KF-4
AB-5
Yeah, interesting comparison, too. Daniels was a far more polished AND far more accomplished player, with those accomplishments coming on teh biggest stage. And yet, he has not sniffed the NBA. Hamilton's stock in the NBA is a substantial bit below Daniels
The second part of this is partially right: no matter what Larrier does, people on this board will crucify him.Larrier, a replacement? A 6pt, 3 board, <1 assist guy who averaged 26% from 3 and played only 18 minutes a game at a mid-major is going to fill in what part of DHam's game?
Lord, I already am praying for young Larrier, because this board is going to crucify him when he turns out to be a homeless man's version of DHam.
And yet, absolutely 100% accurate
Dude, you changed your avatar? Now I will be disoriented when you post.I'm optimistic that this board will be a hellhole of suck next year when we inevitably struggle after losing 3 of our top 4 performers from the year prior, including what would have been an AAC POY candidate.
Seriously: Player Season Finder Query Results | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.comThe list of UConn players in our history who could get nine rebounds a night is small.
The list of UConn players in our history who could get five assists a night is small
The list of UConn players in our history who could get both is one.
Daniels is on another planet than DHam when it comes to offense. Shot selection, 3pt shooting, athleticism, posting. Hamilton has a better handle, and creator. But give me Daniels over DHam every day.Daniels averaged 0.5 assists per game in his UConn career. The year we won the title, he had 17 assists the entire season. Hamilton had 170 this year. Hamilton also averaged 9 rebounds to DD's 6.
Daniels had a much, much more limited skill set than Hamilton - but he did become a better spot up three-point shooter, which was his best hope for sticking (as a 3 and D guy).
Not sure I would say that as Daniels was wildly inconsistent. They are too different types of players. Both were good offensive players but neither are great guys that you can lean on to lead the team as the main scoring threat.Daniels is on another planet than DHam when it comes to offense. Shot selection, 3pt shooting, athleticism, posting. Hamilton has a better handle, and creator. But give me Daniels over DHam every day.