SMU to Face Postseason Ban | Page 3 | The Boneyard

SMU to Face Postseason Ban

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Messages
1,970
Reaction Score
10,557
Not surprised. SMU as an athletic department and Larry Brown have had so many issues with the NCAA over the years. Not shocked at all...
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
5,744
Reaction Score
14,099
Yeah, I've been saying for a while now that Syracuse's penalties were much harsher than people were making them out to be, but these SMU penalties are a little extreme. I wasn't really paying any attention the entire process, but I wasn't expecting a post-season ban.

Silver lining is that this makes the AAC tournament a little easier for us.
In the light of the UConn Ban, for an offense that's actually much less severe.
Cuses ban was less severe. For violations grossly more flagrant.
If UConn's ban was identical.
(Keep in mind we already were being penalized for an awful APR in 2008 by loss of scholarship. Plus we lost Scholarships from the Nate Miles fiasco. So our numbers from 2008 2013 are about the same as theirs.)
We essentially were punished again when they rolled out a new punishmement of a four year average that included 2008. Remember if they included the current year
That year would have been dropped from the moving average.
we would have complied. It was essential that the NCAA go back somehow to 2008. Even though our APR improved in the next three years. It wasn't enough to offset that awful year.
Let's look at the way our punishment rolled out
We would have been suspended for Drummonds freshman year. A year were JC was ill and the team although hugely talented underachieved.
JC steps down KO takes over
It would have been over.
(My personal opinion is that the APR ban was made up specifically to punish Jim Calhoun for getting around the scholarship ban by getting Drummond to walk on.
It was a personal vendetta.)
No one would have been allowed to transfer . Without sitting out a year.
Would Drummond declare if we were eligible his sophomore year?
Would Lamb declare ?

Even if they did we would have had a much better team in 2013 ,played in the last Big East tournament and made some noise in the NCAA's.
Recruiting was impacted over the course of a couple of years
Most importantly ,the UConn story for every game for a three year period was:
1They will be suspended next year. Everyone is deserting the ship.
2They are playing for nothing
3 There team was decimemated by last year's punishment. UConn will never recover.
4. Through in the breakup of our conference
Cuse has lost scholies and last year disaster came and went.
I think one senior was thrown under the bus for the good of the Fruit.
Does that seem like equity.
 

geordi

Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,200
Reaction Score
2,940
No, you guys don't understand. North Carolina is being punished by banning SMU and taking scholarships away.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2012
Messages
6,184
Reaction Score
9,280
Rules have always been an annoyance to Larry, won't be surprised if he retires before the season starts.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,047
Reaction Score
219,867
This "joke" is repeated 4 or 5 times on every page about NCAA sanctions, and it hasn't been funny once.
Disagree. I'm sure it was funny once, not in this thread, but if you go back far enough, it probably was hysterical.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2012
Messages
6,184
Reaction Score
9,280
Brown, Boehiem, Williams and Calipari all deserve the Kelvin Sanction type punishment.
 

Stainmaster

Occasionally Constructive
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
21,999
Reaction Score
41,479
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
3,028
Reaction Score
3,724
This coming from the guy who believed that Boeheim was framed? Enough is enough, put him out to pasture and let him focus on his charity work.

He's so transparent. If you're friends with him you could buy players for all he cares. But if you don't like him then he'll bash you.
 

August_West

Conscience do cost
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
51,356
Reaction Score
90,267
UConn990411 said:
Not in this case. Whether UNC gets a fair punishment is a different story, but SMU got this penalty for being a slimy program.

No doubt. Not diminishing SMUs griminess, but at the same time anytime ncaa punishes someone else not named UNC ( and after the Syracuse slap on wrist) you have to laugh at the hypocrisy.
 
Joined
May 7, 2014
Messages
14,609
Reaction Score
30,630
No doubt. Not diminishing SMUs griminess, but at the same time anytime ncaa punishes someone else not named UNC ( and after the Syracuse slap on wrist) you have to laugh at the hypocrisy.
And when was the last time anything significant happened to an SEC school?
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
4,415
Reaction Score
12,820
No doubt. Not diminishing SMUs griminess, but at the same time anytime ncaa punishes someone else not named UNC ( and after the Syracuse slap on wrist) you have to laugh at the hypocrisy.
Without a doubt.

Conservatively speaking, UNC should lose at least one title and face at least one postseason ban. If that doesn't happen, SMU should sue (they won't, but they should).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
390
Guests online
2,228
Total visitors
2,618

Forum statistics

Threads
159,039
Messages
4,178,235
Members
10,049
Latest member
DyNASTY#3


.
Top Bottom