Should Boyle be our starting QB? | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Should Boyle be our starting QB?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The season. Or forever.

So if CC is out for 4-8 weeks you dont want Boyle to play but if CC is out for the year you want him to start. Do I have the right?

And you think Boyle is better than Whitmer based on? Last year? Summer camp?
 
This isn't just about Stony Brook Carl. Its about the remainder of the season. I don't see how Boyle could be any worse than Whitmer. If he is as good or better, which I think he is, why wouldn't we get him reps?

The real question should be, do you believe Whitmer is better than Boyle? That's what we're really talking about. My answer is that I don't.

No, it's entirely about Stony Brook. For me, at least, maybe not for the program leadership right now. Disagree there. The remainder of the season? What does that mean? The season that hasn't started yet? Don't get me started. I rewatched the BYU game last night, finally start to finish. Nobody is telling me that we designed offensive and defensive game plans that were actually specific to BYU.

What I believe about who is a better player or not, right now is irrelevant. Whitmer was a better player than Boyle last season. Boyle did not look good. Whitmer has a turnover problem. Everythign else is there. It's unfortunately was a big problem. He hasn't demonstrated it one game so far this year. What matters is really, who the coaches think the best player is, and apparently they have not yet decided these kinds of things yet.

So really, the question isn't who I think is better, it's who should get the reps that were planned for Casey?, and who should get reps planned for Chandler?

And the answer to all this mess, once again - thanks Fishy - is "Don't f-----king lose to Stony Brook."
 
I would say more than half the season. We have seen enough of Whitmer and if Boyle is not the answer then let's find that out as well. If not, then Diaco can go with one of his own next year.

I hear you - I just find it hard to believe Boyle is that good.
He was WAY BEHIND both QB's last year and now suddenly he is good enough to go from 3rd on the depth chart to 1st - but only if CC gets hurt - otherwise coaches would have him sit all year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pj
I just don't understand why anyone believes Whitmer is good enough based on what we've seen.

Because Whitmer didn't play in a vacuum. I look at the fact he got worse while he's been our QB, and I blame two people. Those two people are gone, and I think he can get better. I don't blame him for the offense. I realize he has faults, but he also has some tools to build on. He's never gotten good protection. He's never had a reliable running game. And he's been asked to do some epically stupid things (lining up at WR) and he's done all of it, and has handled himself with dignity and respect. I think with this schedule and a better ground game, he can get us to 6 wins.

Burning a redshirt isn't building long term, it's playing for today. If we're going to build long term, we should redshirt Boyle, not play him. Boyle will be a better 5th year senior than true sophomore.
 
Because Whitmer didn't play in a vacuum. I look at the fact he got worse while he's been our QB, and I blame two people. Those two people are gone, and I think he can get better. I don't blame him for the offense. I realize he has faults, but he also has some tools to build on. He's never gotten good protection. He's never had a reliable running game. And he's been asked to do some epically stupid things (lining up at WR) and he's done all of it, and has handled himself with dignity and respect. I think with this schedule and a better ground game, he can get us to 6 wins.

Burning a redshirt isn't building long term, it's playing for today. If we're going to build long term, we should redshirt Boyle, not play him. Boyle will be a better 5th year senior than true sophomore.
And is playing Whitmer building for the long term? He is a Senior.
Ok, let's say CC is done due to concussions. We play Whitmer the rest of the year and he maybe gets us 6 wins and that's a big maybe. Then what for next year. We go into a season with no QB with any experience and go through growing pains all over again. I saw as many positives from Boyle last season as I did Whitmer. Whitmer is damaged goods and we saw that against BYU as he did not stand in the pocket and immediately started running for his life. Who cares about the redshirt right now. What if Boyle was RS last year, would you then be in agreement that Boyle should get the nod?
 
.-.
There is a fine line staying in that pocket - if Casey had some mobility he might not be shelved at this point.

IF Boyle sits he still has 4 games experience from last year and I believe Sheriffs has some minimal experience as well. So there is some experience there.

If Chandler gives us 6 wins and a bowl game that is awesome - it gives the 5 extra weeks of practice towards bowl game. If Boyle plays and is still not ready that could kill his confidence even more moving forward. If we can get to a bowl and get the extra practices then it is future building in my eyes.

Again - I dont know whats the right call - I am not a scout or football coach - im just a poster.
 
And is playing Whitmer building for the long term? He is a Senior.
Ok, let's say CC is done due to concussions. We play Whitmer the rest of the year and he maybe gets us 6 wins and that's a big maybe. Then what for next year. We go into a season with no QB with any experience and go through growing pains all over again. I saw as many positives from Boyle last season as I did Whitmer. Whitmer is damaged goods and we saw that against BYU as he did not stand in the pocket and immediately started running for his life. Who cares about the redshirt right now. What if Boyle was RS last year, would you then be in agreement that Boyle should get the nod?

Redshirting Boyle is building for the long term, so yes, playing Whitmer is building for the long term.

No, we'd go into the season with Boyle, who played as a true freshman (experience) and then redshirted. And Bryant Shirreffs who saw time (experience) at NC State before transferring and sitting this year. Then we'd have Tyler Davis as third string hopefully redshirting.

Again, Whitmer had to run for his life for the last 2 years, those habits are hard to break. Especially down 2-3 touchdowns, and facing a talented D-Line that knows you have to pass and is rushing the QB.

You can't make these two statements and believe that you're being consistent.... "And is playing Whitmer building for the long term? He is a Senior.... ...Who cares about the redshirt right now." If you don't care about the redshirt, you are more concerned with this year than the future, which is fine, but be consistent.

I'm not going to debate what-ifs about Boyle not playing last year. I know what I saw from Boyle and it wasn't impressive. It wasn't even close enough for me to think we should burn his redshirt and sit Whitmer. If I saw enough from Boyle to say he was the difference between us going to a bowl game and not going to one, I'd agree to play him. I don't see him getting us there, and I think burning another redshirt year for him is a waste. We can win 6 games with Whitmer.
 
Couldn't disagree more. We can't afford to sacrifice any more years at this point. Unless you know when the next realignment windown will be and when the "last" realignment window will be. If we win 6 with Whitmer and 4 with Boyle, you play whitmer and take your six. If Boyle is as good or better, my guess is we wouldn't have been redshirting him in the first place.

To underscore BL's point, didn't anyone notice how enthusiastic/relieved Boyle was during the presser when HCBD announced he was going to be redshirted this year?
 
This thread. I mean....this thread!!!

Whitmer is better than Boyle currently. We also need to create an extra year separation between Boyle and Cochran (likely), if we believe that Boyle is the future...which I do. The fact that we are on page 3 of this thread is mind-boggling to me, but hey, anything's possible on the Boneyard...
 
This thread. I mean....this thread!!!

Whitmer is better than Boyle currently. We also need to create an extra year separation between Boyle and Cochran (likely), if we believe that Boyle is the future...which I do. The fact that we are on page 3 of this thread is mind-boggling to me, but hey, anything's possible on the Boneyard...

It's still preseason. We've got time to get our $#!7 together.
 
I don't know either. I guess I'm just one of those who believes you get better by playing and that redshirting and sitting a year and then stepping in next year won't make him a better player because he sat and watched.
 
.-.
I don't know either. I guess I'm just one of those who believes you get better by playing

That's a possibility, but here's what Boyle said.

It will be huge for me and my game,” Boyle said. “I have learned this past camp and spring that getting mental reps is a huge part of development as a football player. Seeing things in practice on the sidelines… will help prepare mentally. I am getting ready to play games this year. It’s not like I will be taking taking a year off…I am going to be ready to go. “

http://snyuconn.com/uconn/football/creating-separation-in-qb-depth/
 
The Plan is to redshirt Boyle. Redshirts are not assigned until after the season. If circumstances change, so does the thought process of keeping Boyle's redshirt intact.

I saw much of the same from Whitmer in game 1 and that was enough for me to say move on.
We just saw Whitmer against BYU. He was awful.

Vs. BYU a top 30 program (or thereabouts).
Stony Brook is a different kettle of fish.

My whole premise about not having a problem with the FG in the 4th quarter is because the chances of Whitmer converting a 4th & 12 were as slim to none.

I think Cochran is a better choice than Whitmer at this point and that every week is a new opportunity; A new step. And by status quo, I was referring to a former staff. The one under which Whitmer was not allowed to develop.
 
I don't know either. I guess I'm just one of those who believes you get better by playing and that redshirting and sitting a year and then stepping in next year won't make him a better player because he sat and watched.

Especially with all the BYU talk last week about missions and physically older players being at an advantage I believe it helps Boyle to keep the redshirt. The coaches have already made that choice so let's go for that for now. Each game brings a better more experienced offensive line we hope so go with Chandler and run the ball as much as possible.
 
Maybe it's just a smart kid saying the right things knowing he's not getting the starting job at the time. The last part saying he is ready to go is what I like to hear also. It may be sooner than later after all.
 
.-.
I just don't understand why anyone believes Whitmer is good enough based on what we've seen. If we go with him I really hope that I'm wrong and I will root for him, but I'm not optimistic. If we don't win 6 games with CW as the starter, redshirting Boyle will look like a huge mistake.
Problem is that Boyle just isn't that good either. Pal puts more stock in almosts than anyone I ever met, and he has decided that because 2 passes were dropped in game one Boyle is only a step away from Brady, but here is the reality: QB efficiency 71.8%. Completion percentage:44.1%, TDs: 0, INT:8, Passing yards: 645, Ave/game:124. Longest pass: 36 yards. and as I said he led UConn to 2 offensive touchdowns in 5 games he played in, and 1 of those was a 65 yard McCombs run. What in heavens name do people see in his performance to date that makes them think he is an improvement over Whitmer? By virtually every statistic Whitmer isn't just better, but a lot better. Now I will concede that Boyle might have improved over the summer, but the idea that somehow he has made these great strides seems a little far-fetched in light of Diaco's decision to split the time between Cochran and Whitmer. After all, there is little long term benefit to playing Whitmer since he is a senior.
 
Maybe it's just a smart kid saying the right things knowing he's not getting the starting job at the time. The last part saying he is ready to go is what I like to hear also. It may be sooner than later after all.
Maybe. But he completed 44% of his passes for 0 TDs and 8 INTs.

Maybe he was humbled and realizes he has a lot to learn and wasn't (isn't?) ready for this level yet. The silver lining (I'm reaching, I know) is that with Cochran out for a TBD amount of time, Boyle will get more practice reps, which will help his development.
 
Problem is that Boyle just isn't that good either. Pal puts more stock in almosts than anyone I ever met, and he has decided that because 2 passes were dropped in game one Boyle is only a step away from Brady, but here is the reality: QB efficiency 71.8%. Completion percentage:44.1%, TDs: 0, INT:8, Passing yards: 645, Ave/game:124. Longest pass: 36 yards. and as I said he led UConn to 2 offensive touchdowns in 5 games he played in, and 1 of those was a 65 yard McCombs run. What in heavens name do people see in his performance to date that makes them think he is an improvement over Whitmer? By virtually every statistic Whitmer isn't just better, but a lot better. Now I will concede that Boyle might have improved over the summer, but the idea that somehow he has made these great strides seems a little far-fetched in light of Diaco's decision to split the time between Cochran and Whitmer. After all, there is little long term benefit to playing Whitmer since he is a senior.

It's unfortunate but with young players when stuff starts to go downhill it can turn into an avalanche. It happens.

Coach Diaco is the one who says Boyle has the best physical skills. And I would expect him to have progressed somewhat. As Jim Calhoun once said, -the best think about freshman is they become sophomores.
 
It's unfortunate but with young players when stuff starts to go downhill it can turn into an avalanche. It happens.

Coach Diaco is the one who says Boyle has the best physical skills. And I would expect him to have progressed somewhat. As Jim Calhoun once said, -the best think about freshman is they become sophomores.

Al McGuire said that. A sophmore becoming a redshirt sophmore aint so bad either, if the situation allows for it.
 
I don't know either. I guess I'm just one of those who believes you get better by playing and that redshirting and sitting a year and then stepping in next year won't make him a better player because he sat and watched.

Of course it won't. No one redshirts because it's easier to learn if you aren't also worried about playing. Whom are you arguing with?

One redshirts when won't be of much value to the team that season, but it is at least reasonable to hope that the same player will be of much greater value 4 or 5 years down the road when the extra year kicks in.

Whatever. I am not one for saving redshirts for the future. I'm just comfortable that the staff didn't think Boyle was ready to help the team now.
 
May I ask, if the thought is for Boyle is to redshirt this year, who would go in if Whitmer gets shaken up on a play or struggles mightily against Boise State?

The answer to that question, in my opinion, should at least get some 4th quarter snaps vs Stony Brook tomorrow.
 
.-.
It's unfortunate but with young players when stuff starts to go downhill it can turn into an avalanche. It happens.

Coach Diaco is the one who says Boyle has the best physical skills. And I would expect him to have progressed somewhat. As Jim Calhoun once said, -the best think about freshman is they become sophomores.
He couldn't beat out Whitmer or Cochran. I don't care what physical skills he has. And improving "somewhat" would have meant he moved from bad to just not very good. Right now it is Whitmer's job. I hope he takes the opportunity and succeeds.
 
Whatever happens I think Chandler realizes this is his change to win the starting position from Casey. Go out there tomorrow and dazzle us, that's what we want to see. There were times in 2012 when I saw good things from Whitmer (vs. Pitt) he did just enough to win those games. Be a game manager, get the ball to Davis and dump screen passes to Foxx. That is what will win us the game tomorrow. And put this dumb thread to rest by making us forget about Casey. This is his last chance and I know he will make the most of it.
 
He couldn't beat out Whitmer or Cochran. I don't care what physical skills he has. And improving "somewhat" would have meant he moved from bad to just not very good. Right now it is Whitmer's job. I hope he takes the opportunity and succeeds.
He was hurt. He didn't get a fair chance to compete because he was hurt.
 
Whitmer was not good enough under the status quo. The status quo has changed.

Know what seems crazy to me? Most of us seem willing to give players on this team the benefit of the doubt because of the PPGDL atrocity. The theme is and has been; players and, therefore, the team will be better because ..................

Why is CW any different? If anything, he was the player most harmed by the PP regime. I don't know if he can be what the program needs. I do think he deserves the same consideration as the lineman who couldn't protect him, or any other player that underperformed because of the incompetence of the previous staff. He deserves nothing more. But, certainly, nothing less.

I maybe miss-interpreting, but I thought RD's pointing out that "CW had nothing to prove to the coaches" was very interesting. T
 
You mean the guy who had the worst rting in D-1 last year and had 0 td passes in 5 games? Please. What makes you think he is anywhere near ready this year? He'd have to improve a whole lot just to be bad.[/QUOTE


What's the alternative? I'm hearing now that Casey has concussions from high school and youth football. My son suffers from this and I don't see a good outcome for him. I think we have to go with what we have. Casey may be done.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,381
Messages
4,569,571
Members
10,475
Latest member
Tunwin22


Top Bottom