- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 3,149
- Reaction Score
- 8,314
He probably made a bad post but is it really necessary for 10 posters to pile it on the kid? Give me a break. Back to Gabriel. I'm predicting an October 2nd crystal ball pick from Jerry Meyer data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29ae6/29ae6ad2a25874f8fe82ecded1f50332e2a6e088" alt="Smile :) :)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29ae6/29ae6ad2a25874f8fe82ecded1f50332e2a6e088" alt="Smile :) :)"
We come here for rumors and speculation, why slam Zionn for his speculative rumor-mongering?
I hope my post wasn't perceived as piling on. That was not my intention. I just wanted to show Zionn some love and offer my opinion.He probably made a bad post but is it really necessary for 10 posters to pile it on the kid? Give me a break. Back to Gabriel. I'm predicting an October 2nd crystal ball pick from Jerry Meyer![]()
Thanks Jluc.
It's all good afg. Think what you want. Beauty of a message board. That said - if you think because an OV date was announced we are in the driver's seat . Good for you. I suppose Miami felt the same thing with Durham. Speaking of which, Durham did not factor into my post in WG at all (for what that is worth). I've repeatedly have chimed in on previous posts about never deeming myself an 'insider'. Recruiting is fluid and things change. Weather or not you want to think I have a tie back to program is your prerogative. I simply pass along what I hear and outside of the rumor about a possible transfer last off season, where have I missed the mark exactly? I suppose the rest of the yard insiders are enjoying that Z. Brown announcement from last weekend. Oh
Wait.
Yeah - recruitment and high schoolers. Fun stuff.
To quote Peter Griffin:As Will Ferrell would say, Everybody Love Everybody
If Gabriel commit to UConn, he'll be the first Zionn "Next" to ever commit. He's been correct about every one.
The arguing is about needing something to argue about. Kind of like the Monty Python skit.The attack was totally unnecessary. But I'm not sure what the arguing is really about.
8893 said:The arguing is about needing something to argue about. Kind of like the Monty Python skit. When recruiting is not going well, we argue about recruiting. When recruiting is going well, we argue about the legitimacy of those providing recruiting insight. When we start playing basketball, we argue about whether we are playing well or whether we suck; or whether we are doomed in any event because of our suckass conference situation. If all else fails, we argue about pizza.
This is abuse. You want room 12A.
As Zionn stated, he's not an insider. I wasn't trying to bash him or call him a liar, I just prefer to listen to the scoops from the couple of people who are insiders.
Iron. Lion. Zionn.I think you misunderstood his post. When he 'Next's a recruit, it's not his best guess; it's based on actual information he's received. Any list of posters on this board with more recruiting insight than Zionn is going to be very, very short.
I think you misunderstood his post. When he 'Next's a recruit, it's not his best guess; it's based on actual information he's received. Any list of posters on this board with more recruiting insight than Zionn is going to be very, very short.
I think you misunderstood his post. When he 'Next's a recruit, it's not his best guess; it's based on actual information he's received. Any list of posters on this board with more recruiting insight than Zionn is going to be very, very short.
Channeling my inner fleud, I'm pretty sure that was sneaky passive aggression.
Wow
You get the balloon knots award last night. Z is correct 90% of the time and in the recruiting world that is all star quality. This is such a foolish post. You have zero recruiting comprehension.
I hope you slept it off
..
This sounds like nonsense to me. Saying "next" is like betting that anyone but Kentucky will win the tournament. You're not exactly going out on a limb so being "correct 90% of the time" that a kid goes elsewhere doesn't mean much. And then when a "next" turns out to be wrong, it's "ehh, recruiting is fluid, you don't get it."
I don't follow recruiting that much anymore, but it seems to me that CallMeBruce or whoever called the Gibbs commitment or that guy Ozzie on the other board are supplying much more valuable information than just betting the field every time. I mean, that's cool too but it doesn't exactly make you "all star quality," to use your phrase.
I know you're joking, but I want to be clear to the folks whose critical thinking isn't up to snuff that it wasn't. In my time here, I've gotten two things right, and one thing half-right. People just remember more because they were good things.