Selection Sunday - General discussion (merged threads) | Page 5 | The Boneyard

Selection Sunday - General discussion (merged threads)

This selection committee is turrible....
Simply awful, especially focusing on the ACC. A P4 team that wins its conference and conference tournament titles--gets a 3 seed. An 11-loss team that got blown out by 35 by a Stanford team that wasn't even in the field gets an 8 seed ahead of two teams that beat them. A team that only beat one ranked team all year gets to host. Madness.

We definitely get the toughest 2 seed in Vanderbilt, how does South Carolina get Iowa?
Because LSU and Vandy couldn't be placed in Texas' or South Carolina's bracket. Michigan and Iowa could not be placed in UCLA's bracket. This means that UConn could only face the SEC teams (because both Texas and South Carolina had to be paired with the Big Ten teams). The weaker of the two went to UConn, hence Vandy being paired with UConn and LSU being paired with UCLA.

South Carolina and Texas were paired with the Big Ten teams. Because Iowa was deemed to be stronger than Michigan, they were paired with the weaker 1 seed--South Carolina.

Besides, LSU is the toughest 2 seed.

BTW, the ESPN selection show was very hard to watch. To many cooks, too much talking and laughing over each other, and if they insist on having all these teams screaming and jumping around on camera, at least fix the tape delay problem so that some of them aren't just sitting there.
This! The production was absolutely horrific.
 
Because LSU and Vandy couldn't be placed in Texas' or South Carolina's bracket. Michigan and Iowa could not be placed in UCLA's bracket. This means that UConn could only face the SEC teams (because both Texas and South Carolina had to be paired with the Big Ten teams). The weaker of the two went to UConn, hence Vandy being paired with UConn and LSU being paired with UCLA
This is not true. Teams from the same conference can meet in the Elite Eight game.
 
.-.
This is not true. Teams from the same conference can meet in the Elite Eight game.
Sure, but that's not what I said.

Conference and rematch rules: The first four teams from the same conference are placed in different regions.


Texas and South Carolina are #1 seeds in their respective regionals (Fort Worth 3 and Sacramento 4). That means that LSU and Vandy, the other two of the top four SEC seeds, have to be placed in different regionals. Hence, LSU to Sacramento 2 and Vanderbilt to Fort Worth 1.
 
I don’t know that they ever had one. It’s a UConn thing, just like never cutting down the nets when they win a Regional Championship.

The Huskies don’t celebrate getting chosen for the Big Dance and they don’t celebrate winning the Regionals. There is just one celebration, when they win the National Championship, which they’ve done 12 times.

I'm not sure if Connecticut never cut down regional nets from 1990-2007 or from 2009 to the present, but they absolutely cut down the nets in the 2008 Greensboro Regional. They definitely celebrated, got up on the ladders and took snippets of the net. I was there, and took pics with a Canon PowerShot
 
I am really pleased with the bracket as a UConn fan. We avoided a potential matchup with Tennessee from the 8/9 game. They dropped to a 10 seed.

Frankly, Kentucky, Ole Miss, and Oklahoma are the 4/5 seeds that concerned me. We avoided them as well.

LSU has incredible talent and any team could be in danger if they bring their A game. We avoided them and get Vanderbilt instead. And Vanderbilt is good, but I just don’t see players like Pissott and Galvan torching our defense.

We have a favorable path to at least the final four. I know everyone wants to win a championship. But making the final four means something to me. I would rather lose in a final four than in a sweet 16.
 
As a UConn fan, I am happy with the draw.



Vandy is very good and a match up with them will not be easy, but I would prefer them to LSU. The LSU program is not that far removed from a National Title of their own, and I think that counts for something.
UConn’s path was potentially rocky for about 5 minutes when Vandy was slated as a 1, which would have put Texas or LSU as the Huskies’ 2.

Agree completely that y’all have nobody to fear with that draw. Avoiding any of the SEC 4/5s who have all played like a top ten team at least a couple times this year would be big for any 1 seed.
 
Simply awful, especially focusing on the ACC. A P4 team that wins its conference and conference tournament titles--gets a 3 seed. An 11-loss team that got blown out by 35 by a Stanford team that wasn't even in the field gets an 8 seed ahead of two teams that beat them. A team that only beat one ranked team all year gets to host. Madness.


Because LSU and Vandy couldn't be placed in Texas' or South Carolina's bracket. Michigan and Iowa could not be placed in UCLA's bracket. This means that UConn could only face the SEC teams (because both Texas and South Carolina had to be paired with the Big Ten teams). The weaker of the two went to UConn, hence Vandy being paired with UConn and LSU being paired with UCLA.

South Carolina and Texas were paired with the Big Ten teams. Because Iowa was deemed to be stronger than Michigan, they were paired with the weaker 1 seed--South Carolina.

Besides, LSU is the toughest 2 seed.


This! The production was absolutely horrific.
I agree that the committee and the supposed rules or guidelines it operates under is terrible. The SEC,ACC and Big 10 teams we played this season ( all of whom were ranked when we played them) could not even give us a competitive game, with the notable exception of MICH yet those conferences got undeserving teams in the tournament for beating each other. These same conferences teams also benefit unfairly when it comes to seeding as they won’t put their top teams in the same regional so for example the # 1 and #2 teams ( UConn and UCLA this year) don’t get to play the true # 7 and # 8 seeds as they’ve earned and deserve and instead the SEC teams who aren’t as highly rated or seeded or deserving are slated to play lesser 2 seeds. These supposed big time conferences also have overrated teams that benefit from upsetting each other and getting highly ranked based on both these wins and losses because it artificially increases their strength of schedule. I know many will disagree but there’s no way TN, So Cal or Virginia should be in the tournament, they are terrible teams who lost too many games. TN is an especially egregious case as they get credit for their high strength of schedule yet they were badly beaten by the top tier teams they played and beat nobody really good and have 13 losses and have lost 7 straight and 10 of 12. The other 2 have 13 and 11 losses and were not competitive against any good teams. Something has to be changed and the conferences should not be protected by not having to play their own teams in the regions.
 
.-.
Nebraska is the team that bothers me. 2-7 in their last 9 games. 7-11 in conference play. They had a lot of opportunities to beat good teams this year. They managed a win over Illinois and a win over Washington. That’s it.
 
Vanderbilt is good, but I just don’t see players like Pissott and Galvan torching our defense.
This is my reading too. Vandy reminds me a bit of Syracuse two seasons ago, with Dyaisha Fair and Georgia Woolley, and a few freshmen who had career shooting nights from 3. Fair, like Blakes, is a free throw generating machine. UConn beat them narrowly with one of their thinnest teams in recent years, essentially Paige Nika Aaliyah KK Ash and Ice. In that game, Fair was held almost scoreless for most of three quarters and then went on a tear in the final stretch. I attribute that mainly to the inevitable fatigue of a thin roster. Nika fouled out, also fatigue related in my view.

This time around, UConn has one of its deepest rosters in recent memory, with five excellent ballhandliers and on-ball defenders and four really solid post players. In a game like this, I don’t think it’s even necessary to key on Blakes. She can score 30+, but if Galvan and Pissot are shut down UConn wins by a lot. UConn’s press will probably exhaust Galvan before the fourth quarter.

In terms of the headlines, I have a feeling both Azzi and Sarah will dominate, and the networks will get to sell the idea of a head-to-head duel with Blakes, irrelevant as it will really be. And Blanca may run wild on offense and defense.
 
I'm not sure if Connecticut never cut down regional nets from 1990-2007 or from 2009 to the present, but they absolutely cut down the nets in the 2008 Greensboro Regional. They definitely celebrated, got up on the ladders and took snippets of the net. I was there, and took pics with a Canon PowerShot
I stand corrected. But at some point they stopped cutting down the nets at the Regionals. In Albany in 2017 I was at the Regionals when they rolled out the ladder after the game. It just stood there, like a lonely guy on the dance floor.

it’s a player tradition now. Geno and the coaches have nothing to do with it.
 
No offense, ND friends, but go Stags! Fairfield is an in-state team, one which gave us Lou Lopez-Senechal. And careful, Irish, Coach Carly Thibault-DuDonis knows what she’s doing on the sideline

 

Forum statistics

Threads
167,669
Messages
4,533,961
Members
10,406
Latest member
Bertski0065


Top Bottom