Somebody keeps explaining this. They weren't going to put 2 SEC teams as the #1 and #2 in the same Region.
Yes that’s correct. The 4th rated SEC team (Vandy) was going to be in UConn’s region, assuming UConn was the #1 overall seed, which it was. That is a “written in stone” seeding requirement.
overated big ten
I think Creme's projection was UConn versus FDU. I was all prepared to talk about the two games in history between UConn and FDU, So it's a little bit of a letdown to have nothing to say about UTSA a team UConn has never played.
We did play Iowa, was that a factor?
Karen Aston (Texas) is the Coach. She has history with UConn
The math isn't mathing as they say. How they're a 2 over a team like Duke who won their conference outright is puzzling to me.
LAST in... We're dancing in Iowa City. If we beat Virginia we get Georgia and then if that miracle continues the Hawkeyes
I probably would've picked Duke over Michigan, but Duke's losses to Clemson/South Florida killed them.
South Carolina is overall #4, not Texas
The Orange have the infamous Natasha Adair on the coaching staff.
So why dont they they UConn if they are number 4
SC will play UConn in the national semifinals assuming they both make it. The other semifinal would be UCLA & TX, assuming they both make it.
Texas is the number 3 overall seed.
South Carolina and UCONN will meet in the Final Four if both advance. If Texas advances to the Final Four they'll play the winner of UCLA's region.
I thought since both were in Fort Worth they would match up in final four thats why I questioned it
Maybe it’s the “act like you’ve been here before” treatment
This question seems to come up every year:
I remember a few parties early on, but they are all choreographed by whoever is broadcasting the NCAAs or ESPN and they are monumentally cheesy and a waste of time for anyone who knows they are going to the Dance. But for whatever reason Conn may be the only school that doesn't do it, but I'm eternally grateful we don't engage in the silliness.
