OT: - Realignment? | Page 40 | The Boneyard

OT: Realignment?

I'm still amazed at the perception (throughout the media and those who should/do know better than me) that the Big XII is the better more stable conference... and more amazed that that perception is because the conference potentially being raided has the desirable teams that the middle class ones in that conference want to run away from (which in turn will make that conference inherently less stable as you get minnows in with the bigger brands).

It would seem like the smartest play would be to unite the strongest brands under whatever conference shell allows the most deadweight to be dropped... that's the Pac-12. Yet the Big XII is rapidly discussing another GOR (but wisely a shorter contract, they'll hit the market again before the AAC & ACC) to try to continue to buy the impression of more stability. A Pac-whatever with the same GOR & 7-year term reportedly being discussed would have the ability to span the same time-slots, bigger markets and brands.

It'll be interesting to see how it works out, but I'd think:

Washington + Oregon + Cal + Stanford + Utah + Colorado + ASU + Arizona (and Wash. St; Ore. St) adding Texas Tech, OSU, Houston & Kansas --- carries more markets/brands and TV interest splitting dollars 14 ways

As opposed to

Texas Tech, OSU, Houston, TCU, Kansas, BYU (and Kansas St, Iowa St, Baylor, WVU, Cincy, UCF) adding Utah, Colorado, ASU & Arizona --- and splitting it 16 ways
 

Since 2006, 11 of the NCAA Volleyball National Champions have been won by schools in the B1G.

If you have watched an NCAA Volleyball championship game, please raise your hand. Outside of the Olympics I seen a total of 0 volleyball games. Don’t get me wrong, great sport and fun to watch but it’s not in my top 25 list for fun. I am sure some other folks feel otherwise, but I would be surprised if It’s a large following. If there was we would see volleyball on TV In prime time.
 
.-.
If you have watched an NCAA Volleyball championship game, please raise your hand. Outside of the Olympics I seen a total of 0 volleyball games. Don’t get me wrong, great sport and fun to watch but it’s not in my top 25 list for fun. I am sure some other folks feel otherwise, but I would be surprised if It’s a large following. If there was we would see volleyball on TV In prime time.
I also check it out during the Olympics and I actually once stumbled upon an event in Central Park where I got to see Holly McPeak play. California, of course, but I find it odd that B1G states do well in Beach Volleyball. The Great Lakes, I suppose.
 
If B1G ends up adding Stanford it may as well add Cal, Oregon and Washington and its got the 6 PAC Pod. No coors though.

My guess is no. I believe there will be no pods or divisions. 10 conference games with 2 non-cons. No western pods. Cal may get a guaranteed game per year with UCLA or they may take on Cal as a non football member (with a smaller piece of the pie, of course), giving the Cali 3 less travel for their Olympic sports.

With 20 conference teams (2 more would be brought in) and 3 guaranteed in conference games, you could rotate through the rest. Since there would be 14 teams that are not guaranteed rivalries, you could rotate those every 2 years (home and away games) and you would see every team in a 4 year span.
 
If the ACC loses Notre Dame, do they pick us up?
 
I don't think UCLA and USC thought this through. The PAC 12 has AZ, AZ State, Berkeley, Oregon, Stanford, Utah, Washington, and UCLA & USC. The B1G doesn't even sponsor women's beach volleyball and Nebraska is Independent. I suppose the move that sport to the WCC or Big West.


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)Los AngelesCaliforniaBruinsPac-12 Conference (Future conference: TBD, primary: Big Ten, both in 2025)I
University of Southern California (USC)Los AngelesCaliforniaTrojansPac-12 Conference (Future conference: TBD, primary: BIg Ten, both in 2025)
 
If you have watched an NCAA Volleyball championship game, please raise your hand. Outside of the Olympics I seen a total of 0 volleyball games. Don’t get me wrong, great sport and fun to watch but it’s not in my top 25 list for fun. I am sure some other folks feel otherwise, but I would be surprised if It’s a large following. If there was we would see volleyball on TV In prime time.
My hand is raised. It's a great TV sport. As in football, you are always viewing from the "line of scrimmage", in this case center court.
 
I don't think UCLA and USC thought this through. The PAC 12 has AZ, AZ State, Berkeley, Oregon, Stanford, Utah, Washington, and UCLA & USC. The B1G doesn't even sponsor women's beach volleyball and Nebraska is Independent. I suppose the move that sport to the WCC or Big West.


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)Los AngelesCaliforniaBruinsPac-12 Conference (Future conference: TBD, primary: Big Ten, both in 2025)I
University of Southern California (USC)Los AngelesCaliforniaTrojansPac-12 Conference (Future conference: TBD, primary: BIg Ten, both in 2025)

I assuming this is sarcastic because they wouldn’t turn down that kind of money because of beach volleyball. Many Big10 schools sponsor sports that aren’t conference sports.
 
.-.
If B1G ends up adding Stanford it may as well add Cal, Oregon and Washington and its got the 6 PAC Pod. No coors though.

Part of me is beginning to think the B1G just doesn't like Phil Knight and all the influence Nike has had over college athletics over the past 30-40 years.

A Stanford and Cal double whammy makes some sense in that it gets any tendency of California governor to meddle out of the way and gives teams traveling west a doudlbe dip. Play Stanford on Thursday and Cal on Sat or Sun (or vice versa). Saves on travel. You do the same with USC/UCLA.

Unfortunate reality is Oregon is one of those nouveau riche and Oregon isn't much of a market for the eastern half of the country. If you have USC/UCLA/Cal/Stanford you have all the west coast TV's you need. A double dip in the San Fran and San Jose markets crushes Portland and Seattle.
 
.-.
Part of me is beginning to think the B1G just doesn't like Phil Knight and all the influence Nike has had over college athletics over the past 30-40 years.

A Stanford and Cal double whammy makes some sense in that it gets any tendency of California governor to meddle out of the way and gives teams traveling west a doudlbe dip. Play Stanford on Thursday and Cal on Sat or Sun (or vice versa). Saves on travel. You do the same with USC/UCLA.

Unfortunate reality is Oregon is one of those nouveau riche and Oregon isn't much of a market for the eastern half of the country. If you have USC/UCLA/Cal/Stanford you have all the west coast TV's you need. A double dip in the San Fran and San Jose markets crushes Portland and Seattle.
Stanford and Cal make complete sense too not just because of the markets but two of the most prestigious universities in the world. That's B1G, especially when the conference expands to western europe and east asia. Also interesting, it seems that kids today are all about Under Armour. All those uniform changes in Oregon have possibly jumped the shark.

Let's not forget, the B1G Academic Alliance, formerly the CIC - Committee on Institutional Cooperation.

B1G Academic Alliance
 
Stanford and Cal make complete sense too not just because of the markets but two of the most prestigious universities in the world. That's B1G, especially when the conference expands to western europe and east asia. Also interesting, it seems that kids today are all about Under Armour. All those uniform changes in Oregon have possibly jumped the shark.

Let's not forget, the B1G Academic Alliance, formerly the CIC - Committee on Institutional Cooperation.

B1G Academic Alliance

My 19 year old still loves Nike, but is more into Storm, Roto-Grip and Hammer right now.

My middle school students, as of this past spring, are all about Crocks, but they have to be bright white and white mid calf length socks. When they wore athletic brands, it was Addias (soccer) and Nike for everything else.
 
Out of 130 FBS football programs…

  • 52.3% are Nike
  • 28.5% are Adidas
  • 13.1% are Under Armour
  • 5.3% are Jordan Brand
  • 0.8% are New Balance
 
My 19 year old still loves Nike, but is more into Storm, Roto-Grip and Hammer right now.

My middle school students, as of this past spring, are all about Crocks, but they have to be bright white and white mid calf length socks. When they wore athletic brands, it was Addias (soccer) and Nike for everything else.
Nike is the king, no doubt. Under Armour has been yugely very successful of late. I mention the kids because they seem drawn to UA more so than Nike. I'm sure it changes by year.
 
.-.
A little birdie told me that Oklahoma and Texas would be welcomed back to the Big12, but Rutgers wouldn’t be allowed in the AAC.
76CFD4FD-9BDD-47B2-BBEA-FBA66A7F3EA0.jpeg
“ What? It’s true!“
 
For anyone familiar with USC and UCLA history, what historic games do you think will air on BTN for USC Day and UCLA Day in August 2024?

Keep in mind that the 24 hour days include not only football and basketball, but Olympic sports as well.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,190
Messages
4,556,246
Members
10,441
Latest member
Virginiafan


Top Bottom