But we have an example of that in Camden and how cutting funding doesn't even necessarily mean less police. People get all caught up in the title and don't bother to actually look at plans. Defund and before that abolish are not perfect names because it's impossible to simplify a plan into 3 words and tell the whole story. I don't mean to single you out but you're making the same judgement others do when you assume cutting funding = cutting police.
Regarding the second point of why it's police funding and not other funding that's being brought up I suggest you look at
@Rico444 's post a few up. He nails the difference of opinion there. And that's not to say you're completely off, we should be looking at all areas to find where we're overspending, not just police