Ranking the Star Wars Movies



ZooCougar

Shut Up Carl.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
19,538
Likes
14,205
A lot of the love of 4-6 is nostalgia. Kids don't feel the same way about those movies that our generation does. Those movies come out just as technology was making big screen science fiction movies viable. Those movies were such a quantum leap from what came before in terms of special effects that they blew people's minds in the late 70's and early 80's, which covered up fairly generic plots and mediocre acting for the most part, along with a lot of silly dialogue.
That simply has not been my experience with our 13 year old and his friends. Back when we were watching Star Wars all the time, they always wanted to see The Empire Strikes Back.

Here’s the thing. The story of the original theory is great. Without that you have nothing. Which is basically what 1-3 and 7 and 8 have been.

Episode 7 had it’s charms but it was like watching a Friends reunion with an all too familiar plot.
 

ZooCougar

Shut Up Carl.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
19,538
Likes
14,205
Empire Strikes Back is one of the best movies of all time. Best theater of all time. It belongs in the discussion with Aeschylus's Oedipus, Sophocles' Antigone, and Homer's Illiad. It's why, even after crappy prequels and crappy sequels, fanboys continue to spend on the new dreck.
It is in some ways the perfect sequel. Better than the first movies and leaves you with a sense of dread and suspense for what happens next.

I don’t even remember what happened in The Last Jedi. Hillary Clinton flew back into the spaceship and they fought a battle on a red velvet planet. It was stupid.
 

Fishy

Puncher of Throats
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
14,789
Likes
46,585
Empire Strikes Back is one of the best movies of all time. Best theater of all time. It belongs in the discussion with Aeschylus's Oedipus, Sophocles' Antigone, and Homer's Illiad. It's why, even after crappy prequels and crappy sequels, fanboys continue to spend on the new dreck.
I have never spent money to see a Star Wars movie.

Well, unless you count the $8,000 I spent to see Solo. Plus whatever the rum cost.

But that's it - I won't spent more than $8,012.50 to see any Star Wars movie. They're just not that good.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
30,014
Likes
22,842
That simply has not been my experience with our 13 year old and his friends. Back when we were watching Star Wars all the time, they always wanted to see The Empire Strikes Back.

Here’s the thing. The story of the original theory is great. Without that you have nothing. Which is basically what 1-3 and 7 and 8 have been.

Episode 7 had it’s charms but it was like watching a Friends reunion with an all too familiar plot.
Wrath of Khan came out around the same time as Empire Strikes Back, and that movie was awesome too. The special effects in the old Star Trek TV show were so awful that they are still mocked today. By 1979, real special effects were possible, and the franchise was brought to the big screen. Star Trek the Motion Picture was basically just special effects with some talking in between, but Wrath of Khan was a real movie, and one of the greatest science fiction movies ever. That movie ages as well or better than any of the original Star Wars.

I think a lot of GenXers love of the originals is just nostalgia.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
30,014
Likes
22,842
Magic happens when actor and role mesh perfectly. Like Khan and Montalbon.
The fact that Ricardo Montalbon played one of the top movie villains of all time is kind of insane when you look at Montalbon by that point in his career. Fantasy Island was a modest hit, albeit one that was considered ridiculous even for the era. Montalbon's best days were behind him, and strangely, he didn't really leverage Wrath of Khan into a rebirth of his film career.

Your cast were a bunch of middle aged character actors typecast by a show that only ran for 3 season, but somehow got cult status in re-runs. Wrath of Khan was a sequel to a single episode of this TV show, and had run 15 years before the movie was released. This movie had flop written all over it, and somehow it just worked.
 

ZooCougar

Shut Up Carl.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
19,538
Likes
14,205
Wrath of Khan came out around the same time as Empire Strikes Back, and that movie was awesome too. The special effects in the old Star Trek TV show were so awful that they are still mocked today. By 1979, real special effects were possible, and the franchise was brought to the big screen. Star Trek the Motion Picture was basically just special effects with some talking in between, but Wrath of Khan was a real movie, and one of the greatest science fiction movies ever. That movie ages as well or better than any of the original Star Wars.

I think a lot of GenXers love of the originals is just nostalgia.
That’s another movie that had a compelling story. There’s a reason why the reboot tried to copy it and made an inferior product.
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
4,071
Likes
8,607
Episode 4-6 are a benchmark that may not be beaten until movies become more entertaining than TV again. And even then it may not happen.

I can’t think of a better trilogy. Everyone wants to beat it but nobody ever has.

There is simply no debate.
I’d take Indiana Jones over them. Toy Story too. LOTR is right there for me. Hell, even Nolan’s Batman’s. But then, I’m no SW lover. They’re fine, but never awestruck me as a kid.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,234
Likes
15,828
The fact that Ricardo Montalbon played one of the top movie villains of all time is kind of insane when you look at Montalbon by that point in his career...
And to add, his reading of "fine Corinthian leather" in that Plymouth commercial was a running punchline everywhere at the time.
 

intlzncster

i fart in your general direction
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
27,579
Likes
33,181
That would have made for a worse individual movie (Empire is perfect as it is), but a better trilogy. Return of the Jedi had only one place to go and everyone knew it. And they did it poorly. A RotJ where Luke and Vader start on the same side is a much more compelling premise.
I don't get all the hate for RoTJ. I enjoyed it, especially as a kid. Perfect? No, but damn good fun in my estimation. I remember having my balls in my stomach during the speeder bike scene. Tho maybe they hadn't dropped yet?

As you said, they had one way to go. So all suspense is effectively gone.
 

ZooCougar

Shut Up Carl.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
19,538
Likes
14,205
I’d take Indiana Jones over them. Toy Story too. LOTR is right there for me. Hell, even Nolan’s Batman’s. But then, I’m no SW lover. They’re fine, but never awestruck me as a kid.

I love the Indiana Jones movies. But I don’t think they are as good, but they were pretty huge.

Nolan is one of my favorite directors but only The Dark Knight was on a truly classic level.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Messages
6,378
Likes
3,901
Fingers crossed as the teaser looks good....


Which desert world is this? Tatooine, Jakku, Jedha? As XI was filed in Jordan, where Rouge was was filmed (Tatooine was in Tunsia and Jakku was Abu Dhabi) and as the rumor is that Ray & Co. is after some mporant Jedi artifacts, my bet is on Jedha.

Lando!?

The ship behind the A Wing that is on fire looks to have the tower of a Imperial Class Star Destroyer built into the body of an Old Republic Venator Class Star Destroyer with the markings of the Rebel Alliance.

In the last scene, is that Yavin and DS 1 or Endor and DS2 and what role does good old Palpatine is playing? I am split on location as Leia has the old awards medal from the Battle of Yavin in her hand (is this where she dies?); but, Paps 'died' above Endor on the DS 2.

Which Skywalker is rising? Luke returns, Anakin returns, Ben/Kylo redeems himself, Rey turns out to be a Skywalker or is Skywalker the name that Rey gives to her new Jedi order?
 

Top