I wish the outcry about the "travesty of justice" with Candace Parker would go away.... but of course it will not..... I really like Candace... and I like her game ... I really do. But it is absolutely NOT her birthright to get passage onto the Olympic team..... (assuming this mention is all about her not being named to the team)..... From all the feedback and blowback I have seen and heard about this perceived injustice, the argument is that it was an easy call to name her to the team..... after all she IS one of the best players in the country.... and that should pay her freight onto the team.
But as an uber talented graduating jobseeker wunderkind must be a good fit for his/her prospective employer, a basketball player must be a good fit for her team. This includes raw talent, ability and attitude to be a good team player, chemistry with teammates and coaches, etc.... and the list goes beyond that. The annals of recent basketball history are littered with examples of teams NOT taking the best players as judged by just talent. There was a recent men's olympic team, i believe, in the 90s.... which was made up of different combinations of players who were used to playing ball with each other..... coupling all star forwards with their NBA team's point guard. Bobby Knight was famous for not only taking his own Indiana players to international competition (who were not commensurate talent wise with others who were better) but actually "snubbing" (to use the same term used here) Charles Barkley in the 1984 olympic trials and leaving him off the team..... when he by all accounts was THE dominant forward at the trials and was the best at that position. Knight chose for the team instead a little known forward from Vanderbilt (Jeff Somebody... i forget).... who never played a minute in the NBA.....
Coach K has done the same thing with favoring his Duke players ... on the women's side, Pat Summit herself chose 2 of her own Tennessee players for the 84 olympics..... there were not any other NCAA teams who had more players named to Pat's olympic team than that..... and this is 1984, 3 years before the Lady Vols won their first NCAA title.... in 84 La Tech was big.... USC had just won back to back championships.... Tennessee had not gotten to the top yet, but there they were represented with 16 percent of the olympic roster.....
The point is.... when choosing a team, you do not necessarily choose the 12 best players..... the 12 best athletes.... there are many factors which go into the selection process,,,, and although i understand the controversy at a fan level, I honestly do not understand why Geno is being vilified over Candace's omission. It was the decision of the board, and NOT Geno's decision .... that of player personnel. And, IF you believe that that is nonsense ... that HE chooses the players, then why can't he choose the team members he wants as opposed to what others say he must do.
I would no more second guess the olympic committee (or Geno if it was him) for choosing the team they chose than I would second guessing Coach K, Bobby Knight, or Pat Summit in building their rosters with those with whom they felt most comfortable.