not recently, in the big games, they haven't been on the short end.
Do you think Baylor felt it wasn't a big game? The coach and players I'm sure wouldn't agree with that. And the national media went pretty crazy over a game that you seem to be trying to classify as "not a big game."
What about the prior NCAA Tourney season 2019? They beat Louisville. You think Louisville felt it wasn't a big game?
This past year on Nat'l TV UCONN beat South Carolina during the reg. season. It was a number 1 vs number 2 matchup; that wasn't a big game? Since "when" did number 1 vs "number 2" on NAt'l TV not be considered "big?"
UCONN has had top-tier recruiting classes the past 3 years; is that telling us that to "the audience that matters most (the recruits)," that UCONN hasn't won "big games recently?" The exposure of getting to Final Fours, meaning you had to beat a tough team in the E8, isn't a big game?
For a team that supposedly "hasn't won big games recently" why would so many top-tier recruits over the past 3 years come to "the sticks in cold-weather Storrs, on a campus not as great vs the Power P5 teams, and in a non-P5 conference, come to a program "that hasn't won a big game recently?