Possible Big 12 Invite rumors | Page 22 | The Boneyard

Possible Big 12 Invite rumors

Big 12 Yea/ Nay

  • We got no choice

    Votes: 305 46.9%
  • Stay in the Big East

    Votes: 251 38.6%
  • Are we there yet?

    Votes: 94 14.5%

  • Total voters
    650
I'm happy to be back in the Big East. But nobody can make any argument that the NBE is more popular than the OBE. Not remotely close

Strips for the O-BET used to run 4 figures. The best seats for the QF, SF and Finals ran significantly more than they do today.

This year I bought courtside seats for the semis, something like $ 400 per. Those seats used to be triple the price over a decade ago.

Cuse, Louisville, Pitt fans packed the building. WVU & BC fans not the same, but still more than Butler & Depaul. Creighton & Marquette are decent draws

The NBE has been hurt by the demise of St John's and Georgetown

Different times, different memberships, different context.

The current iteration of the Big East is just fine and doesn't need to be "more popular" than its previous iterations to be successful and produce national champions.

I really don't understand why the UConn fan base here has to be such s regarding the B.E all the time.

The league is what it is. Its was a great product prior to UConn's return, its a great product now while UConn is a member, and it will continue to be a great product if/when UConn leaves.

I would hate for UConn to leave. It wouldn't feel the same as a fan to follow UConn in the Big-12... or Big 10...

From a fan standpoint I would probably prefer the current ACC members.

But ideally I just want UConn to stay in place in our home, the Big East.
 
^^^^^

Whoa, I'm not complaining or comparing the two

I'm the guy who has said B10 or bust. I'm a hoops guy, and I love the Big East. I don't believe our hoops will be hurt if we don't move.

I was responding to the Nova guy above me that seemed to be saying BET attendance is better now than it was. That just can't be true
 
???

The B12 signed a new deal without Texas and Oklahoma. The schools are making more money WITHOUT Texas and Oklahoma.

They would have made even more had Texas and Oklahoma stayed.

This is my entire point: the ACC will be worth MORE than it is now, even if 3 or 4 of Virginia, UNC, Clemson or FSU leave.
The Big 12 is an entirely different conference with UT and OU. Comparing conference contracts of a different vintage is silly.
 
The Big 12 is an entirely different conference with UT and OU. Comparing conference contracts of a different vintage is silly.
I'm not sure why this is so difficult.

the B12 has already signed a new TV contract that DOES NOT include Texas and Oklahoma. We're comparing the NEW B12 contract (which doesn't include them) to the ACCs contract.
 
Disney has financial problems, but ESPN is an ATM that dominates its space and is making smart decisions about increasing its digital properties in lieu of cord cutting. ESPN will be just fine.
This is different than what Bob Iger said on the earnings call but I am confident that you probably know more than him.
 
.-.
It does. That's a major reason why when UConn plays there the prices go through the roof, whereas when other big east teams play there they're pretty reasonable.
Don't use facts when making a reasonable comment with any Big East member who can only see what they want too.
 
I'm not sure why this is so difficult.

the B12 has already signed a new TV contract that DOES NOT include Texas and Oklahoma. We're comparing the NEW B12 contract (which doesn't include them) to the ACCs contract.
They are substantially similar. Big 12 is 31.7M each school. ACC is $30m. My understanding is the ACC deal escalates the payment every year.
 
They are substantially similar. Big 12 is 31.7M each school. ACC is $30m. My understanding is the ACC deal escalates the payment every year.
Now take out UNC, Clemson, FSU, Virginia, etc. and replace them with ??? and what's the new deal worth?
 
Question:

Why is UConn worth a gazillion dollars in the Big 12, but not worth anything in the Big East? That is the argument here, right?
Because the NBE is a modest regional basketball conference. Basketball doesn’t generate the $ that football does. You want to say that is wrong? Fine but the people who pay the bills disagree and disagree strongly! UConn in the Big East gets $5.6 million roughly. ND reportedly makes around $11 million from the ACC. But it’s Notre Dame. Most reports I’ve read say basketball is worth 20% of league’s media deal. Which sort of lines up with the NBE’a $5.6 ish deal and power leagues getting deals in the $30 millions. The Zags deal with the B12 is something on those lines. Maybe a bit more.

Bottom line is UConn basketball, great as it may be, is worth what the market says it is worth. And the NBE as a basketball only entity, is only going to generate 6-8 million/team. We’re there such a thing as an Independent in basketball, UConn might be worth more than it is in the NBE.
 
Because the NBE is a modest regional basketball conference. Basketball doesn’t generate the $ that football does. You want to say that is wrong? Fine but the people who pay the bills disagree and disagree strongly! UConn in the Big East gets $5.6 million roughly. ND reportedly makes around $11 million from the ACC. But it’s Notre Dame. Most reports I’ve read say basketball is worth 20% of league’s media deal. Which sort of lines up with the NBE’a $5.6 ish deal and power leagues getting deals in the $30 millions. The Zags deal with the B12 is something on those lines. Maybe a bit more.

Bottom line is UConn basketball, great as it may be, is worth what the market says it is worth. And the NBE as a basketball only entity, is only going to generate 6-8 million/team. We’re there such a thing as an Independent in basketball, UConn might be worth more than it is in the NBE.
And don't forget another reason why UConn Football would be valuable to the Big 12 and any other conference which includes football

"In the 2023 class, Georgia, Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson, Penn State, Notre Dame and Michigan each signed at least one player from New England, and a fair amount of talent is coming from out of the region to attend high-level academic boarding schools, and in the process raising the football profile of many of them."

 
.-.
Didn't they also speak to Gonzaga ? It'll be a home run if they added Uconn , Gonzaga, St. John's , Villanova, Georgetown, Marquette, Xavier, Creighton. Don't think Uconn is a NY team, it's not. You fill up MSG a couple times a year , other than that Uconn gets no press coverage in NY at all. It's the same with Syracuse.They add St. John's, the other Big East City markets and then you have a lot more News Coverage. St. John's fans would watch Uconn football on TV. Uconn will end up like Syracuse,Pitt, Boston College, Rutgers if they go away by themselves.
Fairfield County is generally considered part of the New York metropolitan area. SNY covers women’s basketball and is successful with it. We’ve had articles in the Post and Times and have discussed on NY sports talk radio. We do move the needle in NYC. Pitt and BC are not NYC teams. We can add viewers in the NYC market.
 
Who do I feel that some are portraying UConn (and fans) as standing around like a beggar on the street waiting for some kind soul to drop an offer into our outstretched cap. UConn, excellent in the classroom and athletic fields, is a treasure that will elevate any school she chooses as an associate and deserves to be treated as such.
 
This is different than what Bob Iger said on the earnings call but I am confident that you probably know more than him.
I read the transcript and it certainly didn't seem like Iger's hair is on fire regarding ESPN. Certainly, any media company takes a hit advertising-wise during a slow down/mini-recession but they know how to navigate those sorts of waters.

How did you interpret it?
 
Who do I feel that some are portraying UConn (and fans) as standing around like a beggar on the street waiting for some kind soul to drop an offer into our outstretched cap. UConn, excellent in the classroom and athletic fields, is a treasure that will elevate any school she chooses as an associate and deserves to be treated as such.
We are ….. UCONN!!!
 
.-.
We have no choice but to accept a Big 12 invite if they want us.

You can’t turn down that kind of money even though sentimentally we like the Big East conference.
I’m in only if 2-3 more eastern teams the likes of Syracuse, Pittsburgh, BC, Louisville & other ACC teams from a dismantled ACC for an eastern contingent to go along with UWV ‘ Cincy.
 
Because the NBE is a modest regional basketball conference. Basketball doesn’t generate the $ that football does. You want to say that is wrong? Fine but the people who pay the bills disagree and disagree strongly!
Funny enough, basketball actually generates more money than football. The CFP and bowls generates $670M, while March Madness is over $1B. However, 100% of the CFP revenue goes to the conferences, while ONLY 15% of the NCAAT revenue gets distributed back to conferences. The other 85% is used to subsidize non-revenue D1, D2, and D3 sports.

If the distribution onus was flipped to football, the old Big East would still be alive. Each tournament credit would be worth $10M-12M instead of the $2M it’s worth right now, meaning that our tournament run this year would have generated $60M-72M in credits rather than $12M.

How long will it be until the power conferences make their own basketball tournament? 15% of $1B is only $150M. Could a P5-only tournament generate more than $150M in TV revenue each year? Because that’s all it will take for those greedy SOB’s to start a movement to split.
 
Because the NBE is a modest regional basketball conference. Basketball doesn’t generate the $ that football does. You want to say that is wrong? Fine but the people who pay the bills disagree and disagree strongly! UConn in the Big East gets $5.6 million roughly. ND reportedly makes around $11 million from the ACC. But it’s Notre Dame. Most reports I’ve read say basketball is worth 20% of league’s media deal. Which sort of lines up with the NBE’a $5.6 ish deal and power leagues getting deals in the $30 millions. The Zags deal with the B12 is something on those lines. Maybe a bit more.

Bottom line is UConn basketball, great as it may be, is worth what the market says it is worth. And the NBE as a basketball only entity, is only going to generate 6-8 million/team. We’re there such a thing as an Independent in basketball, UConn might be worth more than it is in the NBE.

What does “modest regional basketball conference”. Your terminology is obviously meant to be demeaning but I don’t get your point. Isn’t every basketball conference regional? Well, maybe not the B1G once the west coast teams join, but who else isn’t regional?
 
Now take out UNC, Clemson, FSU, Virginia, etc. and replace them with ??? and what's the new deal worth?
More than the B12.

Let's not forget that the ACCs deal was signed in 2013, which is a full 11 years before the B12s kicks in in 2024.

Things have changed. TV rights packages have increased.

Miami, Duke, NC State, Virginia Tech, Georgia Tech, still have value over and above what Kansas, Texas Tech, Baylor and Oklahoma St could bring.
 
Funny enough, basketball actually generates more money than football. The CFP and bowls generates $670M, while March Madness is over $1B. However, 100% of the CFP revenue goes to the conferences, while ONLY 15% of the NCAAT revenue gets distributed back to conferences. The other 85% is used to subsidize non-revenue D1, D2, and D3 sports.

If the distribution onus was flipped to football, the old Big East would still be alive. Each tournament credit would be worth $10M-12M instead of the $2M it’s worth right now, meaning that our tournament run this year would have generated $60M-72M in credits rather than $12M.

How long will it be until the power conferences make their own basketball tournament? 15% of $1B is only $150M. Could a P5-only tournament generate more than $150M in TV revenue each year? Because that’s all it will take for those greedy SOB’s to start a movement to split.
Drop all non-revenue sports.
 
Funny enough, basketball actually generates more money than football. The CFP and bowls generates $670M, while March Madness is over $1B. However, 100% of the CFP revenue goes to the conferences, while ONLY 15% of the NCAAT revenue gets distributed back to conferences. The other 85% is used to subsidize non-revenue D1, D2, and D3 sports.

If the distribution onus was flipped to football, the old Big East would still be alive. Each tournament credit would be worth $10M-12M instead of the $2M it’s worth right now, meaning that our tournament run this year would have generated $60M-72M in credits rather than $12M.

How long will it be until the power conferences make their own basketball tournament? 15% of $1B is only $150M. Could a P5-only tournament generate more than $150M in TV revenue each year? Because that’s all it will take for those greedy SOB’s to start a movement to split.
When and how was it decided that basketball would be used to fund the sisters of the poor?
 
.-.
The problem is we saw what happened to the Cuse, Pitt, and Louisville basketball programs when they left for more money and supposed greener pastures in the ACC, a conference they never fit with culturally. UConn in the Big 12 would be further out of place culturally than they were, with the added stress of ridiculous travel and lack of geographical rivals that fans care about. Of course the Big 12 has some better programs, but these are the same problems we had in the AAC and I just don't understand how so many people just assume we will be able to keep our identity and elite level in basketball if we move. The grass is not always greener on the other side.
 
The problem is we saw what happened to the Cuse, Pitt, and Louisville basketball programs when they left for more money and supposed greener pastures in the ACC, a conference they never fit with culturally. UConn in the Big 12 would be further out of place culturally than they were, with the added stress of ridiculous travel and lack of geographical rivals that fans care about. Of course the Big 12 has some better programs, but these are the same problems we had in the AAC and I just don't understand how so many people just assume we will be able to keep our identity and elite level in basketball if we move. The grass is not always greener on the other side.
Any boat is better than the ocean
 
The problem is we saw what happened to the Cuse, Pitt, and Louisville basketball programs when they left for more money and supposed greener pastures in the ACC, a conference they never fit with culturally. UConn in the Big 12 would be further out of place culturally than they were, with the added stress of ridiculous travel and lack of geographical rivals that fans care about. Of course the Big 12 has some better programs, but these are the same problems we had in the AAC and I just don't understand how so many people just assume we will be able to keep our identity and elite level in basketball if we move. The grass is not always greener on the other side.
I think the common denominator on basketball programs leaving the BE and then deteriorating was a coaching issue. Bad coaching leads to weakened recruiting and poor performance. 4 and 5 stars wanna play for a top program with coaching that can win titles and get them to the NBA. It happened with Syracuse, Pitt, Louisville, BC, and UConn. UConn brings the right coach in and they're right back to the top. The other programs - nope!!
 
If the Big12 extends an offer......................grab it. Do not wait to see what Cuse, L-ville, Pitt, BC, etc decide to do. They abandoned us....................we can tell them to" await their turn" (nah...............tell BC to "F...off"). As was said about the potential pledges in "Animal House,"..............................."We need the dues".


Yes, we do.
 
If the Big12 extends an offer......................grab it. Do not wait to see what Cuse, L-ville, Pitt, BC, etc decide to do. They abandoned us....................we can tell them to" await their turn" (nah...............tell BC to "F...off"). As was said about the potential pledges in "Animal House,"..............................."We need the dues".


Yes, we do.
Agreed - greatness doesn't come from waiting to see what others do.
 
The problem is we saw what happened to the Cuse, Pitt, and Louisville basketball programs when they left for more money and supposed greener pastures in the ACC, a conference they never fit with culturally. UConn in the Big 12 would be further out of place culturally than they were, with the added stress of ridiculous travel and lack of geographical rivals that fans care about. Of course the Big 12 has some better programs, but these are the same problems we had in the AAC and I just don't understand how so many people just assume we will be able to keep our identity and elite level in basketball if we move. The grass is not always greener on the other side.
Because other schools suck we will? You want to be the house on that and forego $350m in the process. Cuse, Pitt and Louisvilles problems aren’t cultural, it’s that they hired crappy coaches. Don’t do that.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,195
Messages
4,556,352
Members
10,442
Latest member
Virginiafan


Top Bottom