Reducing the weight given to the SAT is not giving people of color preference, it's giving them a more level playing field.
If you can't figure out that reducing an unfair advantage is entirely different from creating a disadvantage then I think this conversation is above your level. The only way your argument makes sense is if you believe the scales aren't already tipped in favor of whites. If you believe that, you aren't being intellectually honest.
I'll make it simple. If you play a football game with 12 players against a team with 10 players you have an unfair advantage. Removing the 2 players from one team, so that both teams have 10 players isn't creating a disadvantage for the team that had 12. It's leveling the competitive field of play.
Giving more weight to a GPA because the SAT has proven to be 1) less reliable and 2) culturally biased, doesn't mean whites are somehow disadvantaged. It means the advantage they previously enjoyed will be reduced. This is about equal opportunity. If the SAT hadn't already been shown to be less important than the GPA, and culturally biased in favor of whites, then I wouldn't be arguing against it's importance. But it's seriously flawed, and results in whites being given an advantage.
Increasing state enrollment will prevent whites from being disadvantaged? Why, is that because there are no black people in Connecticut? Unless you increase state enrollment for whites only, your proposal won't do anything to keep whites from being oppressed.
the football analogy has me scratching my head and cultural bias is used way too much as an excuse/alibi - there's many with an Indian (as in country not native American) heritage who have far less culture exposure who seem to have some great success in taking the exam
lets make separate tests for white Americans, European Americans, Asian Americans, Africans, Russians, African Americans and Hispanics- would that even everything up? I don't see it
I also don't see using GPA as a greater barometer being more equitable because we all know grades can be subject to teacher bias/whim and outside pressures
Stating that a conversation is above someone's head is treading on arrogance
There is no simple answer because education is so uneven in this country - from town to town
I feel its up to the individual on how hard they work, how much they want to succeed and no matter what test is placed in front of them, if they prepared properly, in most cases they will succeed.
There has to be a standardized mechanism that will allow comparative results and until someone comes up with that piece, the SATs are one they have now.
I am not saying that the SATs are the answer but it beats what relying on GPA could do (UNC?)