PAC 12 WBB News | Page 23 | The Boneyard

PAC 12 WBB News

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Feb 4, 2019
Messages
949
Reaction Score
1,437
We the exception of one team you could say the wheels have fallen off the pac-12. Not sure why that is? Theories.
 
Joined
May 1, 2020
Messages
6,539
Reaction Score
19,344
Oregon perplexes me. I can understand losing to Arizona, but maybe by a closer margin. Wasn't able to watch their game against Arizona State. Wish I could as that one is a head scratcher.
 

CompSci87

Stanford fan
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
448
Reaction Score
1,160
I watched some of it. Oregon wasn't getting any good looks against ASU's defense. On the other end, Loville was very good, and ASU's other players were hitting shots that they don't always hit, enough to stay ahead.
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2019
Messages
649
Reaction Score
1,529
Oregon tries to win yet another road game (rescheduled) at WSU tomorrow at noon PST. All I can do is hope at this point. Also announced today a make up game with UCLA on the 16th in Eugene. It will be considered a non-conference game and the previous forfeit will stand.
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2017
Messages
2,727
Reaction Score
3,687
Oregon tries to win yet another road game (rescheduled) at WSU tomorrow at noon PST. All I can do is hope at this point. Also announced today a make up game with UCLA on the 16th in Eugene. It will be considered a non-conference game and the previous forfeit will stand.
Ah ..the Pac 12, I wish the conference would take a little more leadership and responsibility and trying to make up some of these covid games.

Wonder if Coach Close thinks this will move the Bruins up from the second four out. Or is she just doing Graves of solid.
 

TheFarmFan

Stanford Fan, Huskies Admirer
Joined
Nov 28, 2018
Messages
2,024
Reaction Score
14,348
If the cards fall right, I think the PAC-12 could squeak in with 8 bids. 9 is probably too much of a stretch because for ones to come up, some will have to come down.

And re: UCLA/Oregon, I don't think Close is doing Graves a solid at all: there's much more to gain for UCLA than for Oregon from this, since Oregon already has the win for conference standing purposes, as well as a lock on a bid to the tournament. UCLA still needs to play their way in, and this is one of their best chances to do so.
 

nwhoopfan

hopeless West Coast homer
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
30,348
Reaction Score
58,018
Those crazy NET rankings. Sometimes it's inexplicable why they love certain teams. Utah is in that category.
 

DefenseBB

Snark is always appreciated!
Joined
Nov 10, 2016
Messages
7,978
Reaction Score
29,132
If the cards fall right, I think the PAC-12 could squeak in with 8 bids. 9 is probably too much of a stretch because for ones to come up, some will have to come down.

And re: UCLA/Oregon, I don't think Close is doing Graves a solid at all: there's much more to gain for UCLA than for Oregon from this, since Oregon already has the win for conference standing purposes, as well as a lock on a bid to the tournament. UCLA still needs to play their way in, and this is one of their best chances to do so.
Wait what? No way they get 8 bids. What many need to understand is there will be 68? Bids this year but 32 are automatic bids. Of that 32 20-22 of them are for teams who are outside the top 50 in NET ranking so that leaves on teams within the top 50 likely for the NCAAT.

Using that math, PAC-12 might get 6 and that’s if ASU can continue it’s good run.
 

KnightBridgeAZ

Grand Canyon Knight
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,325
Reaction Score
9,085
Wait what? No way they get 8 bids. What many need to understand is there will be 68? Bids this year but 32 are automatic bids. Of that 32 20-22 of them are for teams who are outside the top 50 in NET ranking so that leaves on teams within the top 50 likely for the NCAAT.

Using that math, PAC-12 might get 6 and that’s if ASU can continue it’s good run.
I mostly agree. As I posted in a separate thread, about 19 conferences do not have a team in the top 50, but the rest do. Only a few of the remaining "not many bid" conferences look to be troublesome in the event of an upset (which adds an additional non top 50 team while the favorite gets an at large), but this is always a concern. And, of course, all the other criteria the committee considers.

My eye-test says that 6 would be a decent accomplishment, although ASU is not the only candidate for #6. I suppose 7 is not impossible, but I just can't see 8. It will really depend on teams improving their past performances.

To someone else's point, yes, I too wish the PAC would have been aggressive in rescheduling games. Because they are consistent on the nights they normally play, the opportunity is there. The downside is that there are 3 teams that are part of almost all the missed games.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
5,923
Reaction Score
20,774
Creamer has the SEC with nine bids. He might be right. I dunno. But I do feel that conferences should be limited to the top half of the conference.
 

TheFarmFan

Stanford Fan, Huskies Admirer
Joined
Nov 28, 2018
Messages
2,024
Reaction Score
14,348
Creme has PAC-12 with 7 in and ASU among first four out. A couple of wins against Stanford/Arizona/Oregon among those bottom three teams and I think you could have 8. Probably won’t happen, but it could.
 

nwhoopfan

hopeless West Coast homer
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
30,348
Reaction Score
58,018
What world am I living in? I've been fretting about how many more teams the Pac will get other than the obvious 3. Maybe quite a few more than I've been thinking I guess.
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2017
Messages
2,727
Reaction Score
3,687
Wait what? No way they get 8 bids. What many need to understand is there will be 68? Bids this year but 32 are automatic bids. Of that 32 20-22 of them are for teams who are outside the top 50 in NET ranking so that leaves on teams within the top 50 likely for the NCAAT.

Using that math, PAC-12 might get 6 and that’s if ASU can continue it’s good run.
ASU needs a split this weekend against the Cats. Sun Devils lost Jan schedule to Covid and only got 2 make ups, the first game against Oregon last week and an upcoming game against Cal.

To me the conference has really dropped the ball in terms of makeups. I look over at the Big East and see similar challenges but more effort to makeup games. And ASU is not the only team impacted and in the running for that 6th spot.

I think the UCLA story could be an inspirational one. Given all the injuries that they've had and problems with scheduling they still have a shot to make the tournament. If they can get a split between their Oregon and Arizona games they deserve consideration.

In fact depending upon how the games fall that February 26th game between ASU and UCLA might well be for the 6th spot. Of course if one of the teams gets hot during the tournament that could also impact the committee's decision.

At this point the most likely scenario is the Pac-12 only puts five teams in the big dance.

But if Charlie Creme had his way he might just go ahead and make Colorado a lock for the dance. I suspect he doesn't invest as much time as he perhaps could in putting together his bracketology. If he was thoughtful in keeping Colorado in his latest reveal I think he's nuts.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 9, 2017
Messages
2,727
Reaction Score
3,687
Creme has PAC-12 with 7 in and ASU among first four out. A couple of wins against Stanford/Arizona/Oregon among those bottom three teams and I think you could have 8. Probably won’t happen, but it could.
It's really interesting at this stage of the season. Creme is nuts..... He has Colorado in his February 8th reveal. No way Colorado goes to the tournament.

I'm not sure about other conferences but the Pac-12 could have anywhere from five to seven teams in the big dance. You're absolutely right the wild stretch run plus the tournament really leaves this up in the air. I'm guessing five teams end up in the tournament.

For example in the unlikely event that Utah stumbles down the stretch and they have losses still remaining against Stanford and Oregon so if they lose against say Oregon State and UCLA and are one and done in the tournament their resume may be damaged enough to fall all the way out of consideration. While the Utes really score the ball against average and below average defenses I don't have a lot of confidence in their defense. So in a scenario where UCLA gets hot and forms the basis for an inspirational movie the Utes could be bye-bye.

Likewise the Cougars have a brutal stretch in February. I wouldn't be surprised to see them lose four of those games and if they're an early out in the tournament then they're gone as well.

While there a lot of intriguing possibilities as I look at the remaining schedule I think the Bruins could be a surprise team in the tournament.

As a Sun Devil fan I think ASU really can control their destiny down the stretch. Unfortunately ASU's very disappointing history in the tournament argues against CTT and the team dancing.
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2017
Messages
2,727
Reaction Score
3,687
Current NET rankings for the Pac-12:
Stanford #3
Arizona #7
Oregon #13
Utah #23
Colorado #34
ASU. #45
UCLA #51
Oregon State #54
Washington State #57
Southern Cal, Cal, and UW off the map (82 or higher )
Colorado's NET is irrelevant, I don't think they'll even play in the WNIT. They've lost five of their last seven and their upcoming schedule has losses against Stanford and Oregon, they play UCLA on the road and I'll pencil that in as a loss and I think Scott Reuck can get his team interested enough to also beat the Buffs. So they are toast.

As I said elsewhere the Utes have a pretty potent offense against average or mediocre defenses. I really don't trust them at all and while they might back into the dance it's entirely possible they stumble down the stretch and if they're one and done in the tournament they might have a difficult time making it in.

So that leaves the Pac-12 with ASU or UCLA. Neither team has a really strong argument and with UCLA's injuries it's going to be tough for them. While I'm rooting for CTT's squad it's very possible that the Pac is represented by 4 this year.

For example, if Stephen F Austin is somehow upset in their tournament do they still get a bid? There are maybe a half dozen other teams that fall into a category like that who really have a stronger argument to dance in the mid-range Pac 12 teams.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
5,923
Reaction Score
20,774

ConferenceOverallPolls
W-LGBPCTW-LPCTHOMEAWAYSTRKAPUSA
9-0-1.00018-3.8579-17-1W105-35-3
7-32.5.70017-3.85010-03-3W23-13-1
7-32.5.70014-7.66711-13-4L22-42-4
6-43.5.60014-7.6677-16-5L10-40-4
4-44.5.50013-7.6509-33-3W30-40-4
3-34.5.50011-8.5799-21-4W22-32-3
4-44.5.50011-7.6117-12-4L21-31-3
5-54.5.50010-7.5888-21-3W10-40-4
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2017
Messages
2,727
Reaction Score
3,687

ConferenceOverallPolls
W-LGBPCTW-LPCTHOMEAWAYSTRKAPUSA
9-0-1.00018-3.8579-17-1W105-35-3
7-32.5.70017-3.85010-03-3W23-13-1
7-32.5.70014-7.66711-13-4L22-42-4
6-43.5.60014-7.6677-16-5L10-40-4
4-44.5.50013-7.6509-33-3W30-40-4
3-34.5.50011-8.5799-21-4W22-32-3
4-44.5.50011-7.6117-12-4L21-31-3
5-54.5.50010-7.5888-21-3W10-40-4
The next 3 weeks will be fun to watch. Pac teams love their home cooking.

Bad losses since 1/1

Utes lost to Colorado in OT...at home.

UCLA got blown out at home by the Trojans, and lost to Colorado on the road.

Bad behavior since 1/1

Pac 12 officials bumbling to reschedule

Scott Reuck double technical ejection in Tempe
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 7, 2019
Messages
649
Reaction Score
1,529
Oregon squeaks out a road win in Pullman 83 - 30. Sabally sat out the game.
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2017
Messages
2,727
Reaction Score
3,687
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
43
Guests online
1,723
Total visitors
1,766

Forum statistics

Threads
159,526
Messages
4,194,829
Members
10,066
Latest member
bardira


.
Top Bottom