OhNo! They call it DoNo?!
They just need to follow through and do the rest of the development.
“If you are building this, that and the other, I think there is a perception among people in the community that there is a wall shutting them out,” said Tina Franklin, who lives in Hartford’s Parkville neighborhood. “The idea that folks in the community have an aversion to ‘new and shiny’ is erroneous. We want new and shiny … but we want to be a part of it.”
I don't know where the Parkville neighborhood is (presumably nearby)...
In that case, I can't see her qualms.It's not really... it's closer to West Hartford/end of Capital Ave than the area being reference around the stadium.
All those quotes are not Deepster. They were more than enough naysayers to get many more quotes.
BTW, the new developer is RMS out of Stamford. This is there "concept" for the north end.
View attachment 34162
Gag order on the city you aren't citing?The city that I referenced took redeveloped a block sized outdated department store and turned into smaller retail and restaurants with apartments above. No one was displaced, and it was a first step in keeping/bringing people downtown at night which in turn dramatically reduced crime rate. Kind of a classic "gentrification" development in the sense that I am familiar with the term. Associating it with the displacement of lower income families is an assumption that often is wrong.
From my perspective, for our cities to safe and productive we need to make them attractive to people. Pretty much everyone benefits from the rising tide when it is done well.
Can't risk it. There are reasons for what CL82 does that the casual city planning fan cannot fathom. Dam may break later in September and CL82 may be able to release the county.Gag order on the city you aren't citing?