UcannUconn said:
Only in soccer can you sit there for 3 hours to see a 0-0 tie and people claim it was a great game. To attract the american viewer they will need to make some changes to the off side rule and possibly make the field smaller... game is just too boring compared to the 4 major sports here. Its a joke the people in the us dont even watch the games but claim to root for the country their great grandfather was from instead of their own country.
Recognizing MLS play is experiencing ongoing improvement and the league attracts the 7th or 8th hughest paid attendance of any league globally, and the US has rising TV ratings for international matches, non-US leagues, and MLS games alike (in English and Spanish), facts simply do not support your perspective. Not liking soccer is OK, and exaggerated NBA-ish/ Duke-ish flopping is rubbish, but shrinking the field is simply ridiculous with absolutely no sound reasoning, the offside rules are fine when called appropriately (similar to good versus bad refereeing in other major sports), etc. It's really OK some people who dislike the sport will always find fault, but getting the facts straight really enhances an opinion. Otherwise, it opens opportunities for comparison with the likes of Ken Krayeske.
Finding baseball or NBA hoops painfully boring does not stop many people, including Yanks, from enjoying the positives of soccer any different than some appreciate a 1-0 pitchers' duo, a low-scoring hockey game, or 7-3 gridiron football games. Similarly, some people enjoy minimal defense NBA games.
Some soccer games suck, but for those with a fair amount of knowledge even a low or no scoring games can be highly entertaining. That doesn't mean everyone will enjoy the sport more or less than everyone will enjoy jazz, classical, rap, or country western music; Turkish, Brazilian, Sichuan, or South African food, red, white, rose, or rice wine, etc. Differing tastes, factual information, and getting the facts straight, are still helpful in any subjective interpretation.