OT: Stock trading | Page 97 | The Boneyard

OT: Stock trading

the Q

Yowie Wowie. We’re gonna have so much fun here
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Messages
7,029
Reaction Score
11,269
There are a lot of free speech issues that are going to come with prosecuting that, a lot of PR issues in going after anonymous message board users, and a lot of potential gray area being opened up around what is market manipulation that I'm not sure the SEC will want to wade into here.

By that logic insider trading is also a free speech issue for the tipper.
 

the Q

Yowie Wowie. We’re gonna have so much fun here
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Messages
7,029
Reaction Score
11,269
The folks on reddit have zero non-public knowledge. Those are not the same thing at all.

It would have the same “free speech” concern.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
9,072
Reaction Score
35,839
It would have the same “free speech” concern.
No, a private conversation between two people that provides insider info for the purpose of someone else trading on that information does not have the same free speech concerns as people on an anonymous public message board without any non-public knowledge discussing the idea that Hedge funds severely overshorted a stock and thus have created a guaranteed future demand and potential short squeeze opportunity. You're reaching hard here and completely off base.
 

the Q

Yowie Wowie. We’re gonna have so much fun here
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Messages
7,029
Reaction Score
11,269
No, a private conversation between two people that provides insider info for the purpose of someone else trading on that information does not have the same free speech concerns as people on an anonymous public message board without any non-public knowledge discussing the idea that Hedge funds severely overshorted a stock and thus have created a guaranteed future demand and potential short squeeze opportunity. You're reaching hard here and completely off base.

No. This was a bunch of people actively colluding to keep buying up a stock to artificially inflate its price
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
9,072
Reaction Score
35,839
No. This was a bunch of people actively colluding to keep buying up a stock to artificially inflate its price
At least you're off the whole this is the same as insider trading from a free speech perspective. What you brought up is the question and not necessarily one that is mutually exclusive to what I've said. But this all raises the question, is Citron working to to actively suppress the value of Gamestop also illegal market manipulation? Is that question the SEC or these hedge funds really want to put out in the spotlight?
 

the Q

Yowie Wowie. We’re gonna have so much fun here
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Messages
7,029
Reaction Score
11,269
At least you're off the whole this is the same as insider trading from a free speech perspective. What you brought up is the question and not necessarily one that is mutually exclusive to what I've said. But this all raises the question, is Citron working to to actively suppress the value of Gamestop also illegal market manipulation? Is that question the SEC or these hedge funds really want to put out in the spotlight?

You brought up speech that is a securities law violation being a feee speech issue, not me.
 

the Q

Yowie Wowie. We’re gonna have so much fun here
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Messages
7,029
Reaction Score
11,269
Never have institutional managers actively colluded to keep buying (or selling) securities and other assets to drive their prices up (or down).

I’m shocked, shocked to find that collusion may be going on here. ;)

I didn’t say that either. But one doesn’t mean the other isn’t happening
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
9,072
Reaction Score
35,839
You brought up speech that is a securities law violation being a feee speech issue, not me.
Okay, so we're in agreement. This may or may not technically be illegal manipulation but it's definitely not in any way the same as insider trading from a free speech perspective.
 

the Q

Yowie Wowie. We’re gonna have so much fun here
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Messages
7,029
Reaction Score
11,269
Okay, so we're in agreement. This may or may not technically be illegal manipulation but it's definitely not in any way the same as insider trading from a free speech perspective.

They are both speech that violates a security law.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
9,072
Reaction Score
35,839
They are both speech that violates a security law.
Those goal posts are about a mile wide at this point, aren't they?

Edit: Let me ask you this. Is a hedge fund manager going on CNBC to say why a stock that they happen to have a short position in is overvalued also illegal market manipulation?
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,859
Reaction Score
9,872
I'm closing out my RH account, and moving things into my Ally or TD Ameritrade account. They are playing games and favoring the 'suits' over the retail investors (lil guys).

Anyone have tips (i.e. what to avoid) on closing stock positions and transferring them (and cash) to another firm?
@KitamanEdit: Potentially, Ally and other established brokers may have reasonably raised margin requirements and possibly limited some transaction types, but transferring away cash and most securities should not require closing positions. See this Understanding the Brokerage Account Transfer Process | FINRA.org
 
Last edited:

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,597
Reaction Score
84,061
I like how random billionaires have lost multiple billions. But why are fellow billionaires bailing out these losers?
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,859
Reaction Score
9,872
Vietnam: big picture, LT manufacturing & supply chain perspective. ST SARS-2 spike now > ST downturn likely. MT to LT upside as Korean, JP, TW, mainland, and western companies including AAPL shift <some> manufacturing to relative stable Christian/Buddhist VN, projected ST downturn > dollar cost averaging low volume VNM ETF. Not a recommendation, just what I’ve seen in process, colleagues in country see and project, and hope succeeds.


Same same with India & low volume FLIN

 
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
1,548
Reaction Score
4,888
I like how random billionaires have lost multiple billions. But why are fellow billionaires bailing out these losers?
Because Gabe Plotkin The creator of Melvin capital did not snitch on Steve Cohen when he committed securities fraud and had to pay a 1.8 billion dollar fine. Plotkin was trader number two at SAC capital.
 

XLCenterFan

CT, NE
Joined
Feb 25, 2018
Messages
3,540
Reaction Score
13,470
If anyone is looking to leave RH like myself, I suggest SoFi. It is a money management app (more than just a trading platform) started by Chamath Palihapitiya. Robinhood deserves to wither and go busto.
 

UConnSwag11

Storrs, CT The Mecca
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,995
Reaction Score
53,442
They actively colluded to manipulate a stock price.

Proving each and every individual case could be problematic. But by the actual rules they could get quite a few of them
if a suit goes on tv and bashes a stock or writes an article about why a stock is overvalued and then it tanks, that's fine? That's what happened with $NIO and $FUBO.
 

UConnSwag11

Storrs, CT The Mecca
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,995
Reaction Score
53,442
If anyone is looking to leave RH like myself, I suggest SoFi. It is a money management app (more than just a trading platform) started by Chamath Palihapitiya. Robinhood deserves to wither and go busto.
Fidelity seemed to be fine. Webull also restricted during the day
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,859
Reaction Score
9,872
Because Gabe Plotkin The creator of Melvin capital did not snitch on Steve Cohen when he committed securities fraud and had to pay a 1.8 billion dollar fine. Plotkin was trader number two at SAC capital.
No way Citadel Securities, not HF Citadel, executes/d any Melvin trades.
 

Online statistics

Members online
317
Guests online
2,616
Total visitors
2,933

Forum statistics

Threads
157,339
Messages
4,094,949
Members
9,985
Latest member
stanfordnyc


Top Bottom