Calhoun has never gifted PT. Have to work in practice.
Yeah, but . . .
One of the following is almost certainly true:
1. JC benched RS early on to try to motivate him, even though DD's practice performance didn't warrant it.
2. JC benched RS early on because DD's practice performance, in JC's mind, warranted it.
If 1, then it's JC's blame because his motivation game backfired (just like it did with AO).
If 2, then it's JC's blame because he would then be a terrible, awful judge of game performance based on observing practice sessions. We all saw it - DD was flat out not good. Lost. Wooden. Awkward. No smooth. Liability on D. What was the decision? A year of RS proving himself in a BE and NC 11 game grind versus a month or two of DD in practice?
Should there not be any basic principle that, if it's close, it goes to the kid with the NC ring and not the kid who's been on campus 70 days?
What the hell was JC looking at? It's extremely hard for me to believe that DD was such a beast in practice that it warranted benching RS.
JC has message benched players many times over the years. If you think that JC hands out PT based solely on practice effort, then we disagree. Sure, that's a large part of it, it seems, but it's not the end all, and there are many examples. AO and RS were just the two most recent ones.
Long and the short of it - last year's complete disaster is all on JC, and nobody else.
For whatever reason, which we here in the Yard will certainly never know, JC made the decision to bench RS for an unproven guy who turned out to be a scrub putting up 3 points and 2 boards a game.
Smith had averaged 6 pts and 5 boards a game in 25 minutes his freshman year.
It's very hard to argue against JC's techniques, of course, because of the 3 NCs. But his techniques seem to result in feast or famine.
Last year we starved. Good thing we ate aplenty the year afore.