Well, they were actually up on the Dolphins by 24--and ended up having to make a goal line stand to preserve the victory.
Unless there are 5 minutes left, and you're ahead by 3 scores, I want my team pressing. I've seen those comebacks happen once every 5 years. Brady by the way, in 2007 (since you're referencing the year they ran on the Bills on 4th down rather than kick a field goal [always a good discussion whether running on 4th rather than taking a 3 is"classier"]), was pulled from games much quicker than Peyton Manning was the prior year when the Colts lead the league in points scored and Manning had 49 TD passes. No hue and cry then.
Not too long ago, I was re-watching a college football game from the mid 90s. During the halftime show, a big topic was running up the score, brought about by FSU beating some team by 40 or so. It was treated as a serious topic. There was a lot of hand wringing about what a terrible message it sent and how it shouldn't happen. Fast forward 20 years and teams with very good offenses are winning games are blowing people out on a weekly basis; 70-14, 63-3, 52-7, 71-7, 66-7, 70-21, 63-7, etc. Now, though, there are no debates about running up the score. Those results are just part of the landscape. You look at women's basketball and you see UConn routinely winning by 40 or 50. The Baylor women have beaten a couple teams by 100 or more this season. Yet, you never hear complaints from the pundits that they are running it up. Somehow, though, it keeps coming up in the NFL, even the competitors are participating in the toughest sport and are well compensated for doing so. Pro football should be the last place you hearing complaining about running up the score.