Where were the faculty at Missouri?
Seems that is a generational thing whereby the strong voices that existed as I entered college decades ago are no longer influential.
Generational in the sense that past generations of strong voices weren't worried about getting fired for speaking out.
Where were the faculty at Missouri?
Seems that is a generational thing whereby the strong voices that existed as I entered college decades ago are no longer influential.
While not as forceful as you, I find a little difficult to understand how people not currently on that campus to witness or experience what it feels to have to see fecal signs of hate could form such a strong opinion against what these kids are protesting.There is a very simple reason that the list was absurd. They wanted him gone! They demanded things that he would never do because he needed to be fired or resign. Why? Because he ignored issues of racism on campus for at least 2 years! Issues that have been a problem for 50+ years! If you took a moment to look beyond your own ignorance you MIGHT understand this.
I hate when things like this happen because it always shows me just how insensitive people (particularly SOME white Americans) are. The audacity to even have an opinion on how minorities should react to racism.... SMFH.
Well one faculty member can be seen at the end of this video:Where were the faculty at Missouri?
Seems that is a generational thing whereby the strong voices that existed as I entered college decades ago are no longer influential.
This sounds like something George III and his advisors would say if they were around today.I think it's a bad road to go down, for people to begin to accept that strikes/riots/boycotts/protests etc. are a normal, expected, and at worst - primary - mode of seeking accountability and if necessary - change - in leadership for any group or organization of community. Is it viable and effective? Sure - but it should be a last resort - and it should never be done without careful thought and consideration about what you do, if you are actually successful.
Slippery slope.
This sounds like something George III and his advisors would say if they were around today.
"Let this be a testament to all of the athletes across the country that you do have power," Tigers defensive end Charles Harris said Monday. "It started with a few individuals on our team, and look what it's become. Look where it's at right now. This is nationally known, and it started with just a few."
The Missouri team's stand was credited with escalating the protest about long-simmering tensions about race and other student welfare issues on campus. It was a serious threat with financial implications: The Missouri athletic department faced a $1 million dollar payment to BYU if it had to back out of the teams' game.
This whole situation makes me want to take a shower. Less about black & white, more about green. Icky.
This kind of immediate feedback directly from the event does very little to ease my concerns about things, that junglehusky thinks would be something that the late King George III might have said.
What I would be happy reading, hearing - is something to the effect that "we tried for years and years to get something done in this community, but the leadership wouldn't listen and we regret that it came to this kind of forceful event to initiate change, but we felt we had no other option other than to threaten the loss of $1million in revenue. We are glad that we do not have to pursue this course any further and this is our plan of action at this point, now that there is a leadership change - the plan is this:..."
I can't continue - because I have no idea what the plan might be now at UMissouri.
But that's not what the player said. He's impressed with himself for making national news.
Guess what kid - that's not too hard to do these days. It will be gone from the national news faster than it got there.
I think you see the answer. Head Coach Gary Pinkel (and his AD) took a firm stand Sunday. This means, to me, that the Football players understood the limits of what they were doing. And, then it is back to the Team Concept to play next weekend.
As for what happens on campus, the Board of Curators (6 of 7 White and almost as many lawyers) of Missouri clearly are behind the quick move. This was the second President at University of Missouri who had ZERO academic background before being made head of the place. Running a campus asylum will never be like running the Domestic business for a corporation. The first weeks will be placing a solid leader in the chair. On campuses, you often lack continuity beyond a few years as students move on; so, there lacks the institutional history to carry much along. The whole event? I think largely symbolic.
Hope you're right Pudge. Are there circumstances where a mutiny is warranted? Sure. It's not something where say the thought process should go from: "I don't really like what our leadership is doing" to....."let's strike/riot/do whatever it takes to get them to resign or be fired."
I'm not suggesting that it wasn't warranted in Missouri - an that that there were not a set of steps inbetween that were taken - but a leadership accountability problem certainly existed long term, and something tneeded to be done. But reading that list of demands? Umm - not good IMO.
I think it's a bad road to go down, for people to begin to accept that strikes/riots/boycotts/protests etc. are a normal, expected, and at worst - primary - mode of seeking accountability and if necessary - change - in leadership for any group or organization of community. Is it viable and effective? Sure - but it should be a last resort - and it should never be done without careful thought and consideration about what you do, if you are actually successful.
I think it got to that point that it was a necessary option and viable at UMissouri, but I think very little thought and consideration was put into what the University community does now.
Slippery slope.
I've been blasted by LRock for being insensitive so I really don't know if it is worth responding in this thread anymore, but protests and boycotts are fundamental to the reasoning behind this country's founding.
I am behind the students in their requests for training gs, diversity classes, etc. But I am apparently insensitive because I don't agree with the group's call for vengeance and arbitrary hirings.
Pinkel is in his 16th year at the University of Missouri
In places like that (thinking B12/SEC), that football coach tenure has more leverage than any old 2 year College President. As soon as he stood up, you knew where that teams was going with this. And, the Board and Boosters and State support - while they may be hurt and/or pissed - knew what had to happen.
Mutiny isn't the issue. The next shoe to drop is at another University where Black athletes decide to make a stand. Without the same power structure, you won't have near the same result.
This is a Watershed moment for College Sports and what the NCAA feared.
Dont see any color in the paragraph you referenced Mick. Do you think you will become generally more conservative when you become part of an older generation?did I say you were?
Also, from Pew Research:
"The polling finds that older generations – Boomers and especially Silents – do not fully embrace diversity. Fewer in these groups see the increasing populations of Latinos and Asians, as well as more racial intermarriage, as changes for the better. For many Silents in particular, Obama himself may represent an unwelcome indicator of the way the face of America has changed. Feelings of “unease” with Obama, along with higher levels of anger, are the emotions that most differentiate the attitudes of Silents from those of the youngest generation."
A pretty roundabout way of saying old white people are still racist.
Meanwhile the culture is dying.You realize the President was born in Kenya and attended madrassas in Indonesia, don't you? I'd call that a multicultural success.
Pinkel is in his 16th year at the University of Missouri
In places like that (thinking B12/SEC), that football coach tenure has more leverage than any old 2 year College President. As soon as he stood up, you knew where that teams was going with this. And, the Board and Boosters and State support - while they may be hurt and/or pissed - knew what had to happen.
Mutiny isn't the issue. The next shoe to drop is at another University where Black athletes decide to make a stand. Without the same power structure, you won't have near the same result.
Meanwhile the culture is dying.
A buddy of mine had an interesting hypothetical.
He said what if the 4 teams in the college playoff follow Missouri lead and boycott the bowl games unless they are paid. How would that be handled by the NCAA and the schools?
Yes, we agree some or parts of the protesters' demands are objectionable. To varying degrees, others while less objectionable are challenging to expect any university to implement. For example, protesters' for all future chancellors and system-wide presidents to be selected by students and faculty. Not just input, but actual selection.There was a lot objectionable about the demands, like taking over the curriculum, but there are a lot of people on that campus that could easily design a strong curriculum for such training.

It was Obama's fault
Why do you say that? Not my opinion. Just like the Walmart remark.