8893
Curiouser
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 29,845
- Reaction Score
- 96,450
Huh, where did I mention the eyes? I said nothing about that in my post.
It's not eye for an eye out there.
You do understand the phrase you used, right? The Code of Hammurabi? I thought it was ironic given Norman's admitted history of attempting to gouge another player's eyes out. I understand that you want to ignore his history, but I think it's an important part of the culture that exists in the league. A culture where we laugh off as "pregame ritual" sending a thug with a baseball bat over to threaten and taunt the other team's star player; where we tolerate post-tackle body slams and repeated head punches before deciding to call a penalty. Where hands routinely grab and twist face masks with the intent to snap necks.
I thought I was pretty clear, but let me be clearer: I don't think what Beckham did is part of the game and I didn't minimize it. That's why I said he should have been ejected on the spot and that the refs are to blame for not ejecting him.I make the distinction as anything that can result in serious off the field repercussions, eg impaired cognitive function or paralysis. Have you not paid attention to the CTE issue out there today? It's the single biggest health related issue in professional sports, particularly in football. There are billion dollar lawsuits involved.
What Beckham did can result in a minor concussion yes, but it can be far worse than that, all the way to death even--obviously very rare (hemorrhage or broken neck). But that is why I said you are rolling the dice, because you just don't know. No knee injury results in that.
Can you predict w any certaincy what will happen when someone gets hit in the head? Because I cannot. They've changed the rules of the game because it is such a huge and important issue. But it doesn't apparently seem to be a big deal to you.
Beckham's transgression was compounded because he blindsided Norman, who therefore was unable to brace himself or prepare for contact. Completely helpless. Additionally, it was to the side of his head, on his temple, the most vulnerable part of the head when it comes to injury,
Again, what he did not REMOTELY 'part of the game' or because 'football is a violent sport'. That's a ridiculous and ignorant excuse with this particular situation. Mind boggling that you think it is.
Edit: and I don't care about the personal fouls, what either did before or after, nor do I think Beckham is 'evil' or what have you. But minimizing a blindside cheap shot to the head is BS.
Where we differ is that I do care about the history, and I don't want to hear Norman complaining about the danger to himself. He brought it on because what he does is not "part of the game," either. It's crap. He should have been penalized much earlier than he was and it never would have gotten that far. He goes beyond the pale in an already dangerous sport. I saw him throw countless cheap shots, and I don't want to hear him crying, much less people like you crying for him.
There's a lot of responsibility to go around, starting with Beckham, obviously. Note, he's the only one getting punished. You seem happy enough to leave it at that, and I think it bears examining the context and the other people who bear some responsibility, too, if people are going to keep vilifying the kid as though this happened in the vacuum where you want to keep it.